On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Frank Groeneveld <
frank+openbsd-po...@frankgroeneveld.nl> wrote:
> On 11/09/15 17:51, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> I asked the upstream author privately, and he said that if you prefer the
>> stock qt4 or the "unpatched" as he calls it, you can switch as well to the
On 11/09/15 17:51, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
I asked the upstream author privately, and he said that if you prefer the
stock qt4 or the "unpatched" as he calls it, you can switch as well to the
qt5 in ports.
Thanks for bringing that to my attention! It does compile and seems to
run fine against qt5
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Frank Groeneveld <
frank+openbsd-po...@frankgroeneveld.nl> wrote:
> On 11/04/15 22:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> Done. (I also added a blank line before the COMMENT).
>>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Seems pretty common for Qt things unfortunately. phantomjs needs a
>> patc
On 11/04/15 22:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Done. (I also added a blank line before the COMMENT).
Thank you!
Seems pretty common for Qt things unfortunately. phantomjs needs a
patched Qt too, calibre uses private interfaces so it needs a :patch
target to find the headers...
Yes, I saw the ph
On 2015/11/04 21:48, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> On 11/03/15 21:59, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > That reads good to me - minor nit, if you run make update-plist it
> > should remove the man/ man/man1/ dirs from the PLIST which i think are
> > not needed.
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I've done this and t
On 11/03/15 21:59, Landry Breuil wrote:
> That reads good to me - minor nit, if you run make update-plist it
> should remove the man/ man/man1/ dirs from the PLIST which i think are
> not needed.
Thanks for the feedback, I've done this and the updated PLIST is in the
tarball attached.
On 11/04
Landry Breuil writes:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:53:21PM +0100, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
>> On 10/31/15 16:47, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
>> >Ping?
>> >
>> >It's quite a simple port which only takes a few minutes to build on my
>> >machine. You can then test it by running something like:
>> >wkhtml
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:53:21PM +0100, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> On 10/31/15 16:47, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> >Ping?
> >
> >It's quite a simple port which only takes a few minutes to build on my
> >machine. You can then test it by running something like:
> >wkhtmltopdf http://www.openbsd.org/ op
On 10/31/15 16:47, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
Ping?
It's quite a simple port which only takes a few minutes to build on my
machine. You can then test it by running something like:
wkhtmltopdf http://www.openbsd.org/ openbsd.pdf
Frank
As noted by somebody off-list, it might be useful to have the
On 10/23/15 22:27, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
This is my first attempt at writing a port.
wkthmltopdf is a program that uses Webkit to convert an HTML file to a
PDF or image file. More information can be found on their website:
http://wkhtmltopdf.org
I use it in a number of Ruby on Rails applicat
10 matches
Mail list logo