On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Brandon Mercer
yourcomputer...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you guys also seen chrome take forever or just not resolve stuff?
I am having this exact issue running the latest chromium pkg on i386
-current from May 27. Was there any resolution to this?
Bryan
Never mind.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=12754
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Bryan Vyhmeister
open...@bsdjournal.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Brandon Mercer
yourcomputer...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you guys also seen chrome take forever or just not resolve
hmm, on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:07:41PM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
thanks for the pacakge/port.
2 issues
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:10 PM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:07:41PM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
page), I have
Well it's instant on my desktop machine.
Will fidle with it a bit.
Eeepcs usually have a slow ssd for user files (depending on how you
configured the partitions). It may be that chrome is touching/reading
a lot of stuff to load the options pane.
But I haven't looked into it so it's just
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
4.7ish packages for i386 amd64 are available here:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Antti Harri i...@openbsd.fi wrote:
Great to have an updated build, but I guess this is still
true:
This package currently requires a CPU supporting SSE2.
You can check this with: dmesg | grep 'cpu.*SSE2'
Yeah. I'm sure it's possible to get it working on
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
page), I have an update to
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter Valchev pvalc...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Auclair Vincent
auclair.vinc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter Valchev pvalc...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
After a long
Tested on an i386 eeepc.
Works fine, some quirks when moving a tab : a square that is not drawn
back until I drop the tab. (it follows the cursor)
Hmm, actually tab dragging is totally busted with fvwm2, I just
noticed - it always pops it out. So I imagine this is window manager
specific,
2010/4/1 Auclair Vincent auclair.vinc...@gmail.com:
Tested on an i386 eeepc.
Works fine, some quirks when moving a tab : a square that is not drawn
back until I drop the tab. (it follows the cursor)
Hmm, actually tab dragging is totally busted with fvwm2, I just
noticed - it always pops it
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Auclair Vincent
auclair.vinc...@gmail.com wrote:
Tested on an i386 eeepc.
Works fine, some quirks when moving a tab : a square that is not drawn
back until I drop the tab. (it follows the cursor)
Hmm, actually tab dragging is totally busted with fvwm2, I just
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
4.7ish packages for i386 amd64 are available here:
http://sightly.net/peter/openbsd/chromium/
As well as the
I'd appreciate tests on amd64, especially, as I don't have one locally
- I tested that it starts up and renders google.com, but anything more
is too much of a pain over ssh X forwarding :-) I know the old port
had V8 issues on amd64, so curious if this works better.
binary package working ok
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:16 PM, joshua stein j...@openbsd.org wrote:
I'd appreciate tests on amd64, especially, as I don't have one locally
- I tested that it starts up and renders google.com, but anything more
is too much of a pain over ssh X forwarding :-) I know the old port
had V8 issues
Hi!
Great to have an updated build, but I guess this is still
true:
This package currently requires a CPU supporting SSE2.
You can check this with: dmesg | grep 'cpu.*SSE2'
The i386 binary pkg installs and runs fine on my laptop.
--
Antti Harri
17 matches
Mail list logo
