2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
with an agenda.
The OpenBSD project people do not follow the bend to Adobe agenda
that some xpdf people follow.
While it's always nice to blame Adobe, please first discuss those
On Friday 25 April 2008 04:00:22 Martin Schröder wrote:
2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
with an agenda.
The OpenBSD project people do not follow the bend to Adobe agenda
that some xpdf people follow.
While
2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
with an agenda.
The OpenBSD project people do not follow the bend to Adobe agenda
that some xpdf people follow.
While it's always nice to blame Adobe, please first discuss
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser en
suivant ce lien.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Le Colombier de Corvol
Séjours calmes et sereins
à Corvol dâEmbernard, au cÅur de la Bourgogne nivernaise et des Vaux de
lâYonne
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
I had a problem building this port, when I make update-plist I get this
message:
Subpackage -: Stripping dirs from x11/tk/8.5
Otherwise it all seems to work. Scratching my head ...
Stu
Enhanced Tk console.
A replacement for the standard console that comes with Tk, tkcon
provides many more
On 2008/04/25 09:34, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
I had a problem building this port, when I make update-plist I get this
message:
Subpackage -: Stripping dirs from x11/tk/8.5
that's normal.
Update to version 1.10.
Simpler/cleaner port.
Examples are now installed.
Regression tests enabled.
Put myself as maintainer (if that's ok).
Stu
tcllib-1.10-port.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
Tk Standard Library
A collection of pure-Tcl utility modules and widgets for Tk that provide
a wide variety of functionality. The intent is to collect commonly used
functions into a single library, which users can rely on to be available
and stable.
Included are the following modules, and much
On 2008/04/25 10:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/04/25 09:34, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
I had a problem building this port, when I make update-plist I get this
message:
Subpackage -: Stripping dirs from x11/tk/8.5
that's normal.
I wanted to post that early to avoid half a dozen
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable. If
this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited if some
version of port is already installed. Glib2 is a good example of a port
needs such prohibition.
No manpage changes yet, I want to get response for the
Small change of installed dir name tcllib1.10 - tcllib
I forgot to mention that Snit is now part of tcllib,
so devel/snit can be removed; I don't think anything depends
on it and if it does the dependency should probably be easy
to change to tcllib.
Stu
From: Stuart Cassoff [EMAIL
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Andrés wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
text.
This kills it. ok?
Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It's purpose is
Small change of installed dir tklib0.4 - tklib
Stu
From: Stuart Cassoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: NEW: devel/tklib
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:31:21 +
Tk Standard Library
A collection of pure-Tcl utility modules and widgets for Tk that provide
a wide variety of
On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable. If
this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited if some
version of port is already installed. Glib2 is a good example of a port
needs such prohibition.
No
25 April 2008 г. 18:09:28 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable.
If this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited
if some version of port is already installed. Glib2 is a good
On 2008/04/25 18:35, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
25 April 2008 ?. 18:09:28 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable.
If this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited
if some version of
Comes with docs examples, no extra charge and no salesman will call.
Stu
Comment:
megawidget set for Tcl/Tk
Description:
The BWidgets have a professional lookfeel as in other well known
Toolkits, but the concept is radically different because everything
is pure Tcl/Tk. No platform
* Martin Schr?der [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 10:00:22]:
2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
with an agenda.
The OpenBSD project people do not follow the bend to Adobe agenda
that some xpdf people follow.
Floor Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You
only need to put return 1; in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial
to change the source and recompile if you need to.
That is much nicer. Here's a new diff from brad that uses your
method.
Works for
Martin Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
anyone, ok?
http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/cracking.html
You mean this part?
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is
Hey!
Attached is an update to cups-pdf-2.4.7.
I made it install the cups-pdf-dispatch tool which is nice for
sending the PDFs via email.
Please test and comment.
Thanks,
Bernd
Makefile | 22 +-
distinfo | 10
Kill the DRM! DIE DIE DIE
In theory, around Friday 25 April 2008 10:22:42 Deanna Phillips wrote:
Floor Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You
only need to put return 1; in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial
to change the source and
this is already in the tree under x11/bwidget
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
Hey!
Attached is an update to cups-pdf-2.4.7.
I made it install the cups-pdf-dispatch tool which is nice for
sending the PDFs via email.
Please test and comment.
Thanks,
Bernd
hey, ok with me. i had the same lying
From: Steven Mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stuart Cassoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: NEW: BWidget
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:57:32 +0200
this is already in the tree under x11/bwidget
So it is ... I simply *must* update my ports tree.
Well ... do with it whatever you
* Martin Schr?der [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 17:32:26]:
2008/4/25 Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is plenty of precedent for this sort of thing. Plus, xpdf
is GPL 2, so we're not dealing with some sort of Iceweasel or Apache
type malarkey. It's not an issue.
Read section 2
Sync our list with the current official list.
Questions?
Jim
Index: network.conf.template
===
RCS file: /openbsd/mirror/ports/infrastructure/templates/network.conf.template,v
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -u -p -r1.120
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Deanna Phillips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Floor Terra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You
only need to put return 1; in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial
to change the source and recompile if you need to.
25 April 2008 г. 18:39:16 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/04/25 18:35, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
25 April 2008 ?. 18:09:28 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED
variable. If this variable is set, port's
2008/4/25 Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This part?
Troll.
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
even allows this).
Go ahead, ignore the authors wishes. Show
* Martin Schr?der [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 23:23:17]:
2008/4/25 Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This part?
Troll.
Wow.
--
Travers Buda
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You mean this part?
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
even allows this).
While an
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED
variable. If this variable is set, port's building process will
be prohibited if some version of port is already installed.
Glib2 is a good example of a port needs such prohibition.
No manpage changes yet, I
This patch will bring the mcabber port to the version 0.9.7 released
today. Included is the resize fix for OpenBSD.
Tested by Simon Kuhnle and myself on amd64. Please test and commit.
Kind regards,
Markus
Index: Makefile
===
RCS
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25:13PM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25:13PM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
even allows this).
Go ahead,
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
even allows this).
Go ahead, ignore the authors wishes. Show your disrespect.
Your logic implies
26 April 2008 г. 01:46:32 Steven Mestdagh wrote:
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED
variable. If this variable is set, port's building process
will be prohibited if some version of port is already
installed. Glib2 is a good example of a port needs
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:16:48PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
even allows this).
Go ahead,
2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
If your logic was true all linux distributions would be breaking the
rules because everyone patches stuff. How did
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Martin Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Martin Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
If your logic was true all linux
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:43:42AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
If your logic was true all linux distributions
updated, thanks!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Markus Hennecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch will bring the mcabber port to the version 0.9.7 released
today. Included is the resize fix for OpenBSD.
Tested by Simon Kuhnle and myself on amd64. Please test and commit.
Kind regards,
2008/4/26 Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2.
a) Yup, there it is, complete with dates:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/textproc/xpdf/patches/
The modified file?
But I rest my case; 4 lines are not worth the trouble.
Best
Martin
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:43:42AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
| 2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
| have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
|
| If your logic was true all linux
2008/4/26 Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
golden. If you disagree (which I fear), could you please state what
part of section 2 you are actually referring to ? What is the problem
according to you ?
a) wants the notion in the modified file, i.e. the patch should also
add a note to the file
One less excuse not to learn Tcl!
I did find the license to be a bit strange but I think
I got the PERMIT_* vars right. Bloody licenses. :/
Stu
Comment:
learn Tcl interactively
Description:
This is a package designed to teach the Tcl programming language in a
quick and easy manner. The goal
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 01:26:53AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
| 2008/4/26 Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| golden. If you disagree (which I fear), could you please state what
| part of section 2 you are actually referring to ? What is the problem
| according to you ?
|
| a) wants the
* Martin Schr?der [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 23:33:05]:
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You mean this part?
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be
Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
want you want but
The following rant in NOT about GPL licensing.
I am neither supporting or denying the the said change to xdpf.
This is a discussion about modifying standards..
What is hypocrytical here is the
On Friday 25 April 2008 20:49:00 Ian McWilliam wrote:
Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
want you want but
The following rant in NOT about GPL licensing.
I am neither supporting or denying the the said change to xdpf.
This is a discussion
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Ian McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody explain why is it acceptable to modify a standard for ports
but not not for base?
I'm going to guess that the core reason is what helps more users?:
- A pdf spec that's written to sell the illusion that you
On Friday, April 25, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Ian McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody explain why is it acceptable to modify a standard for ports
but not not for base?
I'm going to guess that the core reason is what helps more users?:
Nah, it'
Stephan Andre' wrote:
On Friday 25 April 2008 20:49:00 Ian McWilliam wrote:
Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
want you want but
The following rant in NOT about GPL licensing.
I am neither supporting or denying the the said change to xdpf.
On Saturday, April 26, Ian McWilliam wrote:
Why has the 100 character limit filenames stored in a tar archive not
been modified away from its documented standard. (We all know it's 100
character limit is arcane in modern terms.
Please use google and find out what gnu tar has done in this
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Ian McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan Andre' wrote:
On Friday 25 April 2008 20:49:00 Ian McWilliam wrote:
Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
want you want but
The following rant in NOT about GPL
Ian McWilliam wrote:
...
Can anybody explain why is it acceptable to modify a standard for
ports but not not for base?
I think Standards is a bogus argument here. That's not what
this is about.
Try this way of looking at it:
The author of xpdf wants DRM in the source code. That is his
59 matches
Mail list logo
