Ian McWilliam wrote:
...
> Can anybody explain why is it acceptable to modify a "standard" for
> "ports" but not not for "base"?
I think "Standards" is a bogus argument here. That's not what
this is about.
Try this way of looking at it:
The author of xpdf wants DRM in the source code. That is
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stephan Andre' wrote:
>
> > On Friday 25 April 2008 20:49:00 Ian McWilliam wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
> > > want you want but
> > >
> > > The following
On Saturday, April 26, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>
> Why has the 100 character limit filenames stored in a tar archive not
> been modified away from its documented standard. (We all know it's 100
> character limit is arcane in modern terms.
Please use google and find out what gnu tar has done in thi
Stephan Andre' wrote:
On Friday 25 April 2008 20:49:00 Ian McWilliam wrote:
Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
want you want but
The following rant in NOT about GPL licensing.
I am neither supporting or denying the the said change to xdpf.
Thi
On Friday, April 25, "Chris Kuethe" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anybody explain why is it acceptable to modify a "standard" for "ports"
> > but not not for "base"?
>
> I'm going to guess that the core reason is "what helps more users?"
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anybody explain why is it acceptable to modify a "standard" for "ports"
> but not not for "base"?
I'm going to guess that the core reason is "what helps more users?":
- A pdf spec that's written to sell the illusion
On Friday 25 April 2008 20:49:00 Ian McWilliam wrote:
> Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
> want you want but
>
> The following rant in NOT about GPL licensing.
> I am neither supporting or denying the the said change to xdpf.
> This is a discussion
Ok, Not really wanting to comment on this call me a troll, call me
want you want but
The following rant in NOT about GPL licensing.
I am neither supporting or denying the the said change to xdpf.
This is a discussion about modifying "standards"..
What is hypocrytical here is th
* Martin Schr?der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 23:33:05]:
> 2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You mean this part?
> >
> > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > Xpdf is open source, a
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 01:26:53AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
| 2008/4/26 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > golden. If you disagree (which I fear), could you please state what
| > part of section 2 you are actually referring to ? What is the problem
| > according to you ?
|
| a) wants t
One less excuse not to learn Tcl!
I did find the license to be a bit strange but I think
I got the PERMIT_* vars right. Bloody licenses. :/
Stu
Comment:
learn Tcl interactively
Description:
This is a package designed to teach the Tcl programming language in a
quick and easy manner. The goal
2008/4/26 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> golden. If you disagree (which I fear), could you please state what
> part of section 2 you are actually referring to ? What is the problem
> according to you ?
a) wants the notion in the modified file, i.e. the patch should also
add a note to the
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:43:42AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
| 2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
| > have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
| >
| > If your logic was true all linux distr
2008/4/26 Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2.
> a) Yup, there it is, complete with dates:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/textproc/xpdf/patches/
The modified file?
But I rest my case; 4 lines are not worth the trouble.
Best
Martin
updated, thanks!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Markus Hennecke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch will bring the mcabber port to the version 0.9.7 released
> today. Included is the resize fix for OpenBSD.
>
> Tested by Simon Kuhnle and myself on amd64. Please test and commit.
>
> Kind r
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:43:42AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
> > have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
> >
> > If your logic was true all linux distr
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
> > have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
> >
> > If your logic was true
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > Xpdf is open source, and can be m
2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
> have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
>
> If your logic was true all linux distributions would be breaking the
> rules because everyone patches stuff. Ho
Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements
have been met. Why in the world is this being debated?
If your logic was true all linux distributions would be breaking the
rules because everyone patches stuff. How did you even come up with
this?
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:16:48PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > > Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
> > > even allows this)."
> >
26 April 2008 г. 01:46:32 Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > > > > > Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED
> > > > > > variable. If this variable is set, port's building process
> > > > > > will be prohibited if some version of port is already
> > > > > > installed. Glib2 is a good exam
> > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
> > even allows this)."
>
> Go ahead, ignore the authors wishes. Show your disrespect.
Your logi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25:13PM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
> > even allows this)."
>
> Go a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25:13PM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end
This patch will bring the mcabber port to the version 0.9.7 released
today. Included is the resize fix for OpenBSD.
Tested by Simon Kuhnle and myself on amd64. Please test and commit.
Kind regards,
Markus
Index: Makefile
===
RCS fi
> > > > > Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED
> > > > > variable. If this variable is set, port's building process will
> > > > > be prohibited if some version of port is already installed.
> > > > > Glib2 is a good example of a port needs such prohibition.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> 2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You mean this part?
> >
> > "For those who would argue that important content might get
> > irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> > Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
> > even allows this
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You mean this part?
>
> "For those who would argue that important content might get
> irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
> even allows this)."
While an
* Martin Schr?der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 23:23:17]:
> 2008/4/25 Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This part?
>
> Troll.
>
>
Wow.
--
Travers Buda
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "For those who would argue that important content might get
> irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
> Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
> even allows this)."
Go ahead, ignore the authors wishe
2008/4/25 Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This part?
Troll.
25 April 2008 г. 18:39:16 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/04/25 18:35, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > 25 April 2008 ?. 18:09:28 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > > > Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED
> > > > variable. If this variable is s
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Deanna Phillips
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Floor Terra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You
> > only need to put "return 1;" in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial
> > to change the source and recompile if you
Sync our list with the current official list.
Questions?
Jim
Index: network.conf.template
===
RCS file: /openbsd/mirror/ports/infrastructure/templates/network.conf.template,v
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -u -p -r1.120 network.conf.
* Martin Schr?der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 17:32:26]:
> 2008/4/25 Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > There is plenty of precedent for this sort of thing. Plus, xpdf
> > is GPL 2, so we're not dealing with some sort of Iceweasel or Apache
> > type malarkey. It's not an issue.
>
> Re
From: Steven Mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stuart Cassoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: NEW: BWidget
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:57:32 +0200
this is already in the tree under x11/bwidget
So it is ... I simply *must* update my ports tree.
Well ... do with it whatever y
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Attached is an update to cups-pdf-2.4.7.
>
> I made it install the cups-pdf-dispatch tool which is nice for
> sending the PDFs via email.
>
> Please test and comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Bernd
hey, ok with me. i had the s
this is already in the tree under x11/bwidget
Kill the DRM! DIE DIE DIE
In theory, around Friday 25 April 2008 10:22:42 Deanna Phillips wrote:
> Floor Terra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You
> > only need to put "return 1;" in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial
> > to change the s
Hey!
Attached is an update to cups-pdf-2.4.7.
I made it install the cups-pdf-dispatch tool which is nice for
sending the PDFs via email.
Please test and comment.
Thanks,
Bernd
Makefile | 22 +-
distinfo | 10 +
"Martin Schröder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> anyone, ok?
>
> http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/cracking.html
You mean this part?
"For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you th
2008/4/25 Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is plenty of precedent for this sort of thing. Plus, xpdf
> is GPL 2, so we're not dealing with some sort of Iceweasel or Apache
> type malarkey. It's not an issue.
Read section 2 of the GPL2 please.
Best
Martin
2008/4/25 Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> anyone, ok?
http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/cracking.html
Best
Martin
Floor Terra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You
> only need to put "return 1;" in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial
> to change the source and recompile if you need to.
That is much nicer. Here's a new diff from brad that uses your
method.
Work
* Martin Schr?der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 10:00:22]:
> 2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
> > with an agenda.
> >
> > The OpenBSD project people do not follow the "bend to Adobe" agenda
> > that some xpdf peop
Comes with docs & examples, no extra charge and no salesman will call.
Stu
Comment:
megawidget set for Tcl/Tk
Description:
The BWidgets have a professional look&feel as in other well known
Toolkits, but the concept is radically different because everything
is pure Tcl/Tk. No platform dependen
On 2008/04/25 18:35, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 25 April 2008 ?. 18:09:28 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > > Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable.
> > > If this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited
> > > if some
25 April 2008 г. 18:09:28 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable.
> > If this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited
> > if some version of port is already installed. Glib2 is a g
On 2008/04/25 17:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable. If
> this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited if some
> version of port is already installed. Glib2 is a good example of a port
> needs such prohibition.
>
> No
Small change of installed dir tklib0.4 -> tklib
Stu
From: "Stuart Cassoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: NEW: devel/tklib
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:31:21 +
Tk Standard Library
A collection of pure-Tcl utility modules and widgets for Tk that provide
a wide variety of
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Andrés wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
> > text.
> >
> > This kills it. ok?
>
> Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It'
Small change of installed dir name tcllib1.10 -> tcllib
I forgot to mention that Snit is now part of tcllib,
so devel/snit can be removed; I don't think anything depends
on it and if it does the dependency should probably be easy
to change to tcllib.
Stu
From: "Stuart Cassoff" <[EMAIL PROTEC
Patch below adds support of a BUILD_BROKES_WHEN_INSTALLED variable. If
this variable is set, port's building process will be prohibited if some
version of port is already installed. Glib2 is a good example of a port
needs such prohibition.
No manpage changes yet, I want to get response for the
On 2008/04/25 10:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/04/25 09:34, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > I had a problem building this port, when I make update-plist I get this
> > message:
> > Subpackage -: Stripping dirs from x11/tk/8.5
>
> that's normal.
>
I wanted to post that early to avoid half a do
On 2008/04/25 09:34, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> I had a problem building this port, when I make update-plist I get this
> message:
> Subpackage -: Stripping dirs from x11/tk/8.5
that's normal.
I had a problem building this port, when I make update-plist I get this
message:
Subpackage -: Stripping dirs from x11/tk/8.5
Otherwise it all seems to work. Scratching my head ...
Stu
Enhanced Tk console.
A replacement for the standard console that comes with Tk, tkcon
provides many more fea
Update to version 1.10.
Simpler/cleaner port.
Examples are now installed.
Regression tests enabled.
Put myself as maintainer (if that's ok).
Stu
tcllib-1.10-port.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
Tk Standard Library
A collection of pure-Tcl utility modules and widgets for Tk that provide
a wide variety of functionality. The intent is to collect commonly used
functions into a single library, which users can rely on to be available
and stable.
Included are the following modules, and much m
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser en
suivant ce lien.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Le Colombier de Corvol
Séjours calmes et sereins
à Corvol dâEmbernard, au cÅur de la Bourgogne nivernaise et des Vaux de
lâYonne
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[
Here's a small but very useful update to Tcl/Tk. The only difference is now
tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh are patched to make it a little easier to build
Tcl/Tk extensions against the installed Tcl/Tk. This should reduce (by about
one) the patches needed to port some extensions, especially those
> 2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
> > with an agenda.
> >
> > The OpenBSD project people do not follow the "bend to Adobe" agenda
> > that some xpdf people follow.
>
> While it's always nice to blame Adobe, please
On Friday 25 April 2008 04:00:22 Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
> > with an agenda.
> >
> > The OpenBSD project people do not follow the "bend to Adobe" agenda
> > that some xpdf people fol
2008/4/25 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you very much for your opinion, but it is clear you come
> with an agenda.
>
> The OpenBSD project people do not follow the "bend to Adobe" agenda
> that some xpdf people follow.
While it's always nice to blame Adobe, please first discuss th
64 matches
Mail list logo
