On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:30:43 +0200
Remi Pointel wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:02:32 +0200
> remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > sylpheed in port tree is in version 2.7.1. Actual release is 3.0.3, so I
> > have ported it.
> >
> > I used the patch in port tree for 2.7.1 to 3.0.3, an
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:42:25 -0400
Brad wrote:
> Here is an update to transmission 2.10.
Works for me on amd64, using -gtk and -daemon.
Will continue testing this...
Thanks,
Robert
Here is an update to transmission 2.10.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/transmission/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -p -r1.56 Makefile
--- Makefile11 Oct 2010 08:16:52 - 1.56
+++ Makefile
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:02:32 +0200
remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sylpheed in port tree is in version 2.7.1. Actual release is 3.0.3, so I have
> ported it.
>
> I used the patch in port tree for 2.7.1 to 3.0.3, and I set --enable-gpgme in
> default install (now just compface is a poss
hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Jan Stary said that
> (sorry, wrong list before)
>
> On Oct 14 15:40:21, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:26:58AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > > so you got lucky for 10 years, now what?
> > >
> > > port snaps always
Simple version update.
Pure ruby code, so setting PKG_ARCH = *. I enabled the regress tests
even though they are currently empty and don't run.
The previously required patch is no longer needed, apply with -E.
Tested on i386 with rabbitmq. Also compiles fine on amd64. Looking for
OKs.
Jeremy
Simple version update. While here, enable the regress tests.
Tested on i386 with rabbitmq. Also compiles fine on amd64. Looking for
OKs.
Jeremy
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/ruby-amqp/Makefile,v
retrieving revision
Bacon is a small RSpec clone weighing less than 350 LoC but
nevertheless providing all essential features.
Needed for running the regress tests for an upcoming update to the
net/ruby-amqp port. Based on an earlier port by be...@.
Tested on i386 and amd64. Looking for OKs.
Jeremy
ruby-bacon.t
ruby-mysql currently uses the old extconf install method. However, the
other ruby database drivers and most of the other ruby libraries use
gems, so this is best for consistency.
This also allows us to eliminate one of the few remaining uses of
MASTER_SITE_RUBYFORGE in the tree.
The only possibl
On Oct 14 19:49:58, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Jan Stary [2010-10-14 19:21]:
> > > but i guess this is possible if the port snaps building machine's
> > > system was built from newer sources, and wasn't an "official"
> > > snapshot.
> > What "official snapshot"?
>
> the ones theo does. or more pre
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 06:38:15PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Here is an update to Warzone 2100 2.3.5.
>
> I'm looking for someone with an i386 system to test this out.
Updated the diff. I didn't notice there was a conflict locally
with one of the patches from a commit awhile ago to cvs.
Index: Makef
* Jan Stary [2010-10-14 19:21]:
> > but i guess this is possible if the port snaps building machine's
> > system was built from newer sources, and wasn't an "official"
> > snapshot.
> What "official snapshot"?
the ones theo does. or more precise, the ones that end up on
ftp.openbsd.org and it mir
(sorry, wrong list before)
On Oct 14 15:40:21, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:26:58AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > so you got lucky for 10 years, now what?
> >
> > port snaps always lag a bit, you know, the laws of physics.
>
> yes, sometimes more, sometimes les
On Oct 14 15:18:49, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Jan Stary said that
> > > > Snapshots and snapshot packages move forward all the time, unlike
> > > > your installed system. If you have a system that provides
> > > > libcurses.so.10.0, and (a new version
14.10.2010 18:16, Alex Vladimirovich wrote:
Has the issue Stuart mentioned here been fixed?
No.
But it doesn't touch the gui version of PuTTY, for which Stuart
done this GTK2 port.
> From: Henning Brauer
> Date: 2010-10-14 13:42:50
>
> * Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK
[2010-10-14 15:38]:
> > I thought that the party line was that most people should not run
> > -current
>
> FUD
>
> --
> Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
>
h
On 2010/10/14 15:40, frantisek holop wrote:
> i got the bad majors because the packages wanted _newer_ libraries
> than the latest snapshot had. that is exactly the opposite of lagging.
>
> but i guess this is possible if the port snaps building machine's
> system was built from newer sources
ja
On 2010/10/14 15:57, frantisek holop wrote:
> i havent seen time/date differences in package snaps measured
> in days before,
this varies from arch to arch, it has been like this for a long time
with some arch (e.g. sparc64).
for the fastest arch, amd64/i386, you should usually see dates
within 1
Has the issue Stuart mentioned here been fixed?
No.
hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:45:55PM +0200, Henning Brauer said that
> * frantisek holop [2010-10-14 15:43]:
> > hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:26:58AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > > so you got lucky for 10 years, now what?
> > >
> > > port snaps always lag a bit, you know, the laws o
hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:36:04AM -0500, Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF
AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK said that
> From: frantisek holop
> Date: 2010-10-14 13:18:49
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> > i have been using -current exactly like this for
> > more than 10 years. 1. install snaphost, 2. ins
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:51:43PM +0400, Alex Vladimirovich wrote:
> Make gtk2 putty build on 4.8-current with gcc4.
> Shut up "warning: missing sentinel in function call" that cames
> from unix/dtkdlg.c
> (http://www.linuxonly.nl/docs/2/2_Sentinel_warning_missing_sentinel_in_function_call.html)
>
* frantisek holop [2010-10-14 15:43]:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:26:58AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > so you got lucky for 10 years, now what?
> >
> > port snaps always lag a bit, you know, the laws of physics.
>
> yes, sometimes more, sometimes less.
> but if they do, you dont ge
hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:26:58AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> so you got lucky for 10 years, now what?
>
> port snaps always lag a bit, you know, the laws of physics.
yes, sometimes more, sometimes less.
but if they do, you dont get bad major messages from pkg_add,
because the older
* Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK
[2010-10-14 15:38]:
> I thought that the party line was that most people should not run
> -current
FUD
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Servic
From: frantisek holop
Date: 2010-10-14 13:18:49
>
(snip)
> i have been using -current exactly like this for
> more than 10 years. 1. install snaphost, 2. install snapshot
packages.
> 99% of the time this worked great.
> and as far as i know, this is the "party line".
so you got lucky for 10 years, now what?
port snaps always lag a bit, you know, the laws of physics.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:18:49PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Jan Stary said that
> > > > Snapshots and snapshot packages move forward all the t
hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Jan Stary said that
> > > Snapshots and snapshot packages move forward all the time, unlike
> > > your installed system. If you have a system that provides
> > > libcurses.so.10.0, and (a new version of) a package comes out that
> > > requires libcurs
> > Snapshots and snapshot packages move forward all the time, unlike
> > your installed system. If you have a system that provides
> > libcurses.so.10.0, and (a new version of) a package comes out that
> > requires libcurses.so.11.0, there is simply no way to upgrade the
> > package, because your
hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Jan Stary said that
> On Oct 14 10:10:22, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:40:23PM +, Christian Weisgerber said
> > that
> > > frantisek holop wrote:
> > >
> > > > for the last week or so, snapshot packages
> > > > have
On Oct 14 10:10:22, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:40:23PM +, Christian Weisgerber said that
> > frantisek holop wrote:
> >
> > > for the last week or so, snapshot packages
> > > have "strange" dates alternating with a one day difference:
> >
> > > ftp://ftp.fr.open
Hello.
I used symon on my servers (4.5, 4.7, current) and one symux. symux
runs on -current.
On all servers symon started without errors and debug looks like this
symon version 2.82
program id=25205
debug: symon packet size=452
sending packets to udp A.B.C.D 2100 (5s)
started module if(lo0)
start
We actually have SO_PEERCRED, so why not use it?
I've also bumped SHARED_LIBS minor number: is this correct?
ciao,
David
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/libassuan/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1
Make gtk2 putty build on 4.8-current with gcc4.
Shut up "warning: missing sentinel in function call" that cames
from unix/dtkdlg.c
(http://www.linuxonly.nl/docs/2/2_Sentinel_warning_missing_sentinel_in_function_call.html)
Fix from espie@ (ignore "the address of ... will never be NULL")
for unix/gt
hmm, on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:40:23PM +, Christian Weisgerber said that
> frantisek holop wrote:
>
> > for the last week or so, snapshot packages
> > have "strange" dates alternating with a one day difference:
>
> > ftp://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/
>
> I now u
35 matches
Mail list logo
