Re: [update] emacs-28.1

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 02:23:04PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Here's an update to the latest emacs version, very lightly tested so > far on amd64, test build running on sparc64. > > Test reports welcome. So far so good on my amd64 E595. The only comment doom makes is ! Emacs

Re: sysutils/bat

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:15:23AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > > Theo de Raadt wrote on Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 09:12:58AM -0600: > > > Ian Darwin wrote: > > >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 04:47:46PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > > > Changes by:st...@cvs.openbsd.o

Re: [update] emacs-27.2

On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 02:02:52AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03 2021, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > > Got a emacs-27.2-gtk3 package I can download? > > Try those (all flavors are available): > > https://russell.wxcvbn.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/emacs-27.2/ > emacs-27.

Re: NEW: fd v8.1.1

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:23:14PM +1000, Stephen Gregoratto wrote: > Pinging for visibility. Any feedback? > -- > Stephen Gregoratto > As Doom Emacs prefers/recommends it, I would be nice to have a port! Ken

Re: emacs-27.1

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:14:07PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > emacs-27.1 was released earlier than I expected, thanks Ken for the > heads-up. > > This is good news. As mentioned in > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=159380829911290&w=2 emacs now uses > a "portable dumper" tha

Re: [pretest] emacs-27.0.91

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 03:15:05PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04 2020, Timo Myyr?? wrote: > > [...] > > > Is there any particular reason why json is disabled in configure? > > Nope, I just forgot to mention that I had disabled it for no particular > reason. Let's blam

Re: update x11/lablgtk3

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:26:40AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Update lablgtk3. This will be nice to have when updating OCaml to 4.10. > OK? Baring objections relative to the ports slowdown for release, ok krw@. Ken > > Christopher > > > Index: Makefile > ==

Re: update sysutils/opam 2.0.7

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > looks good; ok avsm > Opam 2.0.7 seems to work fine on my amd64 laptop. Not installed from the port, rather upgraded in place. But still. I did not see anything in the Changelog that struck me as critical, so I'm not sure how t

Re: remove devel/ocaml-configurator

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 08:53:22PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > I initially ported this only because I did not realize that this project had > been integrated into devel/dune. This has no use anymore and can be removed. > OK? Makes sense to me. ok krw@ fwiw. Ken > > Ch

Re: update math/coq

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:01:59AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to update math/coq to 8.10+beta2. Which is needed to support > OCaml 4.08. The only user of coq is lang/compcert and was already > updated to support Coq 8.10 and OCaml 4.08. > When this update and the devel

Re: mldonkey: use custom build of OCaml 3.12

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 09:20:09PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > Mldonkey in difficult to adapt to the new 4.08.0 release of OCaml. > Its build system has the option to build against a private build of > OCaml 3.12 and a copy of lablgtk. > I adapted the port to use this option and

Re: [update] emacs-26.2

[On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Here's a diff to update to the latest emacs release. > > Announcement mail: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2019-04/msg3.html > > Tested since a few days with the no_x11 FLAVOR on amd64 and sparc64

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:02:38PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:23:10 +0100 > Marc Espie wrote: > > > Not okay. > > > > You also want an entry in quirks explaining about them, and what to > > do. > > I added the removed packages to quirks with reason 7. Reason 5

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:08:45PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:55:53PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all > > (partly patched) dependencies, the follo

Re: remove devel/{cudf,omake,ounit,ocaml-{cmdliner,cppo,dose,extlib,jsonm,re}} ?

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:55:53PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all > (partly patched) dependencies, the following OCaml libraries are no > longer used by other ports. Since active OCaml users will use opam > instead of O

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.07 and dependent ports

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:55:45AM -0800, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > > > The ocaml depends column I got from the results of 'opam show > > ". I am not sure how seriously to take the info since several say > > they won't work with 4.07.1 and yet they do. :-). > > Which ones? I can fix those upst

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.07 and dependent ports

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:41:25AM -0800, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > > > On 13 Feb 2019, at 09:07, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 21 2018, Christopher Zimmermann > > wrote: > >> On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>

Re: i3 getting killed by pledge

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:19:52PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running i3 on one of my amd64 machines. Recently, it started to crash > with " > > i3[12345]: pledge "dns", syscall 97 > > in /var/log/messages > > There's something wrong here. I don't see recent changes in the pledg

Re: that old INDEX file

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 08:00:02PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > Now might be the time to retire it, specifically > because it's almost always outdated. Removing it is probably the only I'll be motivated to learn the sql way. :-) No objections from me. Ken > > The idea is that sqlports can ge

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.07 and dependent ports

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to > > 2.00rc2 and along with it updates or REVISION bumps of the dependent > > ports. >=20 > He

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.07 and dependent ports

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to > > 2.00rc2 and along with it updates or REVISION bumps of the dependent > > ports. > > Here c

Re: NEW OCaml sysutils/dune math/ocaml-{num,zarith}

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 10:01:54PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to > > 2.00rc2 and along with it updates or REVISION bumps of the dependent > > ports. > > > > tw

Re: dbus autolaunch (was Re: [UPDATE] net/gpodder -> 3.10.3)

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:19:55PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:06:50AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/06/28 08:47, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > > > > I think last patch on firefox workarounded efficiently fork+exec > > > problem (setting DBUS_SESSION_BUS

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.06 and dependent ports

My current ports build cycle takes several days, so adding in ocaml is unlikely to speed things up. So I will toss opam into my mix when the current build finishes and see if it builds all its dependencies and works on amd64. But it will likely be a while before I report back. :-) Ken On Thu

Re: [update] emacs-26.1

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Wed, May 30 2018, kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On May 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, May 29 2018, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > >>> So emacs-26.1 has been relea

Re: [rc] emacs-26.1-rc1

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:47:45PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Ken reminded me that the first 26.1 RC has been published, so here's > a fresh diff; I only tested the no_x11 FLAVOR on amd64 so far. Running gtk3 version now. So far no issues. Ken > > > Index: Makefile >

Re: NEW: lang/ocaml-camlp5

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 07:12:01PM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote: > Hi ports -- > > Attached is a new port, lang/ocaml-camlp5. Camlp5 is an OCaml Preprocessor > and Pretty-Printer. > A quick perusal of the archives indicates that this piece of software has > been proposed numerous times, as far back

Re: Remove benchmarks/bytebench?

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 09:34:58PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > benchmarks/bytebenchBYTE magazine benchmark suite > > The timestamps in the distfile are from February 1992. > (BYTE magazine folded in 1998.) > > I was going to add some fixes to make this compile with clang, but > there

Remove utop port -- let opam handle it

utop is the enhanced command line for ocaml. It is used to develop ocaml programs and maintaining a port is both effortful and likely to be little used once people encounter opam, where it is actively maintained with all of its dependencies and the many nifty libraries ocaml programmers might want

Re: Nuke some Ocaml ports

On 02/28, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:31:21PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > On 2017-02-27 Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > > > > > > devel/utop > > > > > > please no. > > > > I acknowlegde this is a very useful tool for the OCaml developer, but > > it also has heavy

Nuke some Ocaml ports

Following up some private discussions about ports vs opam I did some grep'ing, google'ing, github'ing, and opam'ing and came up with the list below. I think this are prime candidates for being removed from the ports tree. 14 out of the 56 ocaml related ports I could find. ALL but ocaml-curses and

Re: www/firefox can't connect to google.com

On 01/06, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 05:07:54PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:08:56 +0100, Landry Breuil > > > > w

textlive_base amd64+dpb web2c == "No rule to make target 'all'

Trying to compile coccinelle on my amd64 dpb builder with -current sources as of last night fails in the dependency textlive_base. The last messages are gmake[1]: Entering directory '/wrkobjdir/texlive_base-2015/texlive-20150521-source/Work/texk' Making all in . gmake[2]: Entering directory '/wrko

devel/ocaml-extlib to 1.7.0

In light of the current "slow-down" state this is not pressing but since I had it ready I'll send it around. Update extlib to 1.7.0, the same version opam installs when asked. Switches to github hosting. Deletes dead MASTER_SITES. Don't know if a new one should be added. One tweak to a dependent

Update ocaml-cmdliner to 0.9.8

Trivial (?) update to latest ocaml-cmdliner, an opam dependency. This brings cmdliner up to the version that opam itself installs, if you use opam to install cmdliner. ok? Ken Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/oca

Re: collectd breakage, circleq removal

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 04:16:11PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > collectd failed in my bulk (circleq removal) - anyone have time to take a > look? > > tcpconns.c: In function 'conn_read': > tcpconns.c:678: error: 'struct inpthead' has no member named 'cqh_first' > tcpconns.c:686: error: 'struc

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 07:59:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Josh Elsasser writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > >> Kenneth R Westerback writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 10, 201

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: > >> >

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12 (Was: Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386)

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: > > > > So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. > > Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. > > > > Mo

Re: [UPDATE] sbcl-1.1.12 (Was: Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386)

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. > Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. > > More tests on amd64 / ok? ok krw@ Ken > > 1.1.8 i386: > =

Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 02:25:42AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:06:06PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > >> > >> Huh, I thought I had sent this mail... *shrug* >

Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:06:06PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > Huh, I thought I had sent this mail... *shrug* > > - updating clisp to 2.49 > - texlive make build and make fake work fine; pkg/PLIST changed but > that doesn't seem to be due to the clisp update > - updating s

Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386

worked. :-) I'll test when I get home from today's chores. And my current ports build finishes. Ken > > WIP diff at the end of the mail. > > > >Kenneth R Westerback writes: > > > >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 04:54:19PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??g

Re: unbreak lang/sbcl on i386

On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 04:54:19PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > Hi folks, > > here's a diff to correct sbcl's assumptions about struct timeval on > OpenBSD i386. The second build just ended, quick testing shows no > regression. I've refreshed the existing patches while here. >

Re: firefox at macppc

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:27:16PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > On Aug 09 09:31:19, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > It is sometimes not present in package snapshots because the machine > > > building the > > > official packages doesnt have enough physical memory to properly link it, > > > so it > > > oft

Re: xmlcatalog(1) dumps core on macppc/current

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 07:45:16PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > After I upgraded a MacMini to current/macppc, > this is what happens when xmlcatalog is run > during a build of mutt (or by hand any other time) > > Bad system call (core dumped) > > I made a ktrace of it (attached). > Could this

Re: Firefox and the ports tree LOCKED

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:01:25AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrote: > Then I was right regarding how well known the bugs are. ??As you wrote, there > are even known workarounds. There are steps to diagnose YOUR problem and things to try that work for OTHER PEOPLE. Who knows what your problems are until

sbcl 1.1.7

My usual "change version #'s and pray". Files from 'make regress' on cvs as ~krw/sbcl/sbcl1.1.7.regress.amd64 and .macppc. amd64 looks the same. macppc now fails one test it passed before (compiler.pure.lisp / BUG-309448), which seems related to time so I suspect our recent time_t changes may be i

Re: Add rsync.rc?

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 08:23:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/04/21 17:00, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:50:06AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > > With inetd now being off by default, I found the only thing I was > > > runni

Re: Add rsync.rc?

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 05:00:04PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:50:06AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > With inetd now being off by default, I found the only thing I was > > running from it was rsync. Hence creating my first .rc file

Add rsync.rc?

With inetd now being off by default, I found the only thing I was running from it was rsync. Hence creating my first .rc file -- rsync.rc. Seems to work for starting/stopping/checking and allows pkg_scripts to start it up. I am conflicted on whether is should be called 'rsync.rc', since rsync is

Re: [patch] www/webkit

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:27:54PM -0400, David Hill wrote: > hmm, is this better? > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/webkit/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.82 > diff -u -p -r1.82 Makefile > --- Makefile 18 Apr 2

Re: [patch] www/webkit

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 05:18:19PM -0400, David Hill wrote: > Uing webkit 2.0.1 with both xombrero and surf, I get: > > ** Message: console message: undefined @0: RangeError: Maximum call > stack size exceeded. > > This causes at least JavaScript not to work. > > Webkit has: > > // FIXME: remov

Re: [bug] chromium problem since 26.0.1410.43

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:11:15AM +, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:23, Robert Nagy wrote: > > It seems to be a different issue which is not related to chromium itself. > > It is being investigated. I assume you have been trying on i386? > > I suspect you don't need this, but

chrome - libstc++ vs libestdc++ and other errors

It's weird I know, but I run things from the command line. Trying out chrome, I see a few odd messages: $ chrome & [1] 15807 $ /usr/local/bin/chrome[17]: ulimit: bad limit: Invalid argument /usr/local/chrome/chrome:/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.55.0: /usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.14.0 : WARNING: symbol(_

Update sbcl to 1.1.3

Trivial update to 1.1.3. 'make regress' doesn't seem to have changed too much on amd64 and macppc from I recall last time. ok? Ken Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/sbcl/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -

Re: Remove www/firefox35 ?

On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > Hi, > > i'd like to remove www/firefox35 from the ports tree : > - it's been EOL'ed upstream since 18 months, and thus receives no > security updates. I have no idea if there are users of this port still > around. > - it was origin

Re: libc.so.66.0 (system): bad major

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:25:01AM -0400, Scott McEachern wrote: > Hi, I performed a clean install of the latest snapshot (Aug 26) with > the matching ports file and tried building a handful of ports via > DPB. > > After a bunch of failures (eg. net/libproxy; x11/gnome/librsvg; > lang/gcc/4.6,-c++

Re: sbcl 1.0.54 -> 1.0.58

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:04:04AM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote: > Josh Elsasser writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote: > >> Here is an update for sbcl. Tested on i386. 'make regress' passes now. > >> > > > > Looks good, however one nit is that the DISTFILES l

Re: The poppler,-qt4 problem

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Recent changes have led to a new chain of dependencies where gtk+[23] now > depends on qt4: > > x11/gtk+[23] > print/cups,-libs > print/cups-filters > print/poppler > x11/qt4 > > For one thing, t

Re: sbcl 1.0.54 -> 1.0.58

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:56:47AM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote: > > Here is an update for sbcl. Tested on i386. 'make regress' passes now. > > > > Looks good, however one nit is that the DISTFILES line is no longer > needed at all, y

sbcl 1.0.54 update

1.0.52 is now passe, so I refreshed the update to 1.0.54. Passes regress on amd64 and i386 with no unexpected results. On macppc there are a couple of (usual?) regress failures. Status: Expected failure:float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure:float.pure.lisp / (AD

Re: glib2: libgthread-2.0 linked without pthread support

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:12:16AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote: > On 11/21/11 23:04, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote: > >>The problem is that the shared object library > >> > >>/usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2800.0 > >>or > >>/usr/local/

Re: Missing diff for firefox 7/8 on macppc

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:12:22AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 16/11/11(Wed) 13:40, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:41:43PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > &g

Re: Missing diff for firefox 7/8 on macppc

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 16/11/11(Wed) 13:40, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:41:43PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 16/11/11(Wed) 12:21, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > > > On Wed, No

Re: sbcl 1.0.52 update

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:54:24AM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote: > I see this when packaging, maybe you can talk to ingo and fix it? > This did not happen with the former package (from looking at the > archives). > > an1/sbcl.1:44: a newline character is not allowed in an escape name > > Otherwise ok

sbcl 1.0.52 update

In a lispy sort of mood, I did the apparently trivial update of sbcl to 1.0.52 as shown below. Seems to work on amd64 and macppc at least. Enough to get slime going and work the examples in Practical Common Lisp. I also tried a quick update to clisp 2.39, but that doesn't build yet. :-) Ken

Re: [new] sysutils/tarsnap

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:18:37PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > On 03/16/11 12:09, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> Theo wrote: > >>> I think that Colin's behaviour is misleading and contemptable. > >> > >> I had no intention of misleading people. It never occurred to me that > >> anyone > >> would be

Re: firefox 3.5.11

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 01:34:32AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/08/02 00:28, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:17:29PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:05:24 +0200 > > > Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > we still have ffx

Re: firefox 3.5.11

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:28:57AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:17:29PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:05:24 +0200 > > Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we still have ffx 3.5 for the ones who need java plugin - so convert it > > >

Re: kill pkg_info -l

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:45:24PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > Is anyone actually using pkg_info -l ? > > It's an annoying flag that's not even implemented consistently, > and I would like to actually kill it. > I don't even know what it is. So, I'm a no. Ken

Re: anyone interested in (or disgusted by) lang/pugs?

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:32:53PM -0400, Ian Darwin wrote: > > For operating system code, yes. But for some stuff -- I mean > > real-world stuff like web applications -- languages like haskell > > or even lisp are probably more appropriate than C (and Haskell, > > Lisp and C are more appropriate t

Re: anyone interested in (or disgusted by) lang/pugs?

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:23:26AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > On Jun 20, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Kenneth R Westerback > wrote: > > >On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:06:14AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > >>On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 03:06:26PM +0200, Matthias Kil

Re: anyone interested in (or disgusted by) lang/pugs?

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:06:14AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 03:06:26PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 07:57:29AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > You guys should just use scrotwm ;-) > > > > Guess what WM I'm using on my non-{i386,amd64}

Re: anyone interested in (or disgusted by) lang/pugs?

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:26:33AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:32:33AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > > If anyone is interested, let me know; I'll just import it (and all > > > necessary dependencies). Otherwise, I'll remove this stuff from my > > > local tree in a

Re: www/firefox35

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback > wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts > > wrote: > >> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put > >> in the attic? > > > >

Re: Openoffice compile error

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:09:29AM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote: > > Is this standard reply for every port error reports? --- aiming > nobody will test and report in the future? OpenOffice is possibly the most complex and delicate port to compile, with many, many, dependencies. It is usually not worth

Re: qemu readme for people like me

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:47:23AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote: > I always spend 30 minutes re-figuring out how to get qemu running. I > know folks like thib and some others have the same issue. We simply > aren't smart enough to understand the rest of the README. Here is a > diff to the README

compiling gtk+2 -current on macppc - "The generated cache was invalid"

Trying to compile firefox3 on a -current macppc, after pkg_delete'ing all packages, removing all work directories, /usr/local files, etc. I could find, I ended up with: gmake gtk-update-icon-cache gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/packages/wrkobj/gtk+-2.12.11/gtk+-2.12.11/gtk' if cc -DHAVE_CON

libiconv vs gperf

On a newly installed -current i386 box I added a ports tree, cd'd to www/mozilla-firefox and said 'make install' as root. I went for coffee. :-). When I got back it had crashed because the libiconv build could not find gperf. gperf had been built and installed. However the PATH for root did not i

Re: update: net/freeradius

On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:47:47PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: >> I'd love to see this go in, since I'm trying to convince people to >> use OpenBSD/FreeRADIUS at work, but I have no test setup to exercise >> it at

Re: update: net/freeradius

On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:15:45PM +, Rui Reis wrote: > here's a major update to freeradius version 2.0.0. > > I'm also taking maintainership since Tim Kornau doesn't run > freeradius anymore and I've been doing all the previous updates. > > comments/oks? > I'd love to see this go in, since

Re: ddclient + dhclient-exit-hooks

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:45:40AM -0400, mauricio sanzana wrote: > Hi there > > I was searching info in the mailing list about this topic "hooks" and > "ddclient", based in the info of the package > http://www.openbsd.org/3.7_packages/i386/ddclient-3.6.3.tgz-long.html > > Maintainer: The OpenBSD

Re: update: vim7

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:53:42PM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote: > rumor has it the attachment got eaten... > > On 5/10/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >this works for me on i386 and amd64 - feedback from other platforms > >would be appreciated. > > > >i quite like the new brace/bracket

Re: UPDATE: firefox 1.5.0.2

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:18:43AM +0200, Peter Stromberg wrote: > http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.2.html > http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#firefox1.5.0.2 > > Tested on i386 and amd64 (so far) Bit of an email problem at my end so I'm not sure if m

Re: devel/pango, cairo and new XF4

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:19:18PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Aleksander Piotrowski wrote: > >Hi > > > >Config.log says that cairo isn't available as symbols from libfreetype > >aren't found while linking libcairo in. > > > >Maybe it's because of recent XF4 changes? Anyone else has similar > >

Re: UPDATE editors/xemacs21

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:29:22AM +0200, Alexandre Anriot wrote: > Here is an update to 21.4.17, which fixes a few problems. An invalid > bound has been found with Wbounded by alek@, and a few cleanings have > been done. > > matthieu@ has reported that it was working pretty well. > > > Please,

-current amd64 vs firefox: works for me as of Oct. 16.

Just did a full system + packages build from Oct. 16 sources and Firefox works fine on my amd64. So any problems may be just a timing hole with all the updates that were going in over the weekend. Ken

Re: GTK2 + Mozilla Firefox port

Working fine on my amd64. Does seem to look and behave better. Ken On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:40:13AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote: > From: "Mathieu Sauve-Frankel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:06:21PM +0200, Murat Mamitov wrote: > >> Hello, > >> i have seen that Firefox's p

Re: mozilla-firefox 1.0.6 doesn't run on amd64

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 11:25:19AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote: > From: "Marco S Hyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> FWIW, mozilla-firefox-1.0.6 works for me on OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC#31 > >> amd64. That's -release, I presume Marco is trying -current. > > > >Correct, I should have mentioned that. Current a

Re: SECURITY: firefox-1.0.6 for OPENBSD_3_7

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 03:46:01PM +0200, Robert Nagy wrote: > Hi. This is a diff for OpenBSD 3.7 which takes the firefox port > to version 1.0.6. There were a lot of vulnerabilities (just as usual) > so this is mainly a bugfix release. > You can check the list of know and fixed problems here: > ht

Re: i386 ports breakage

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:33:36PM -0700, Michael Coulter wrote: > > audio/libworkmanscsi_cd.h > > Does this work for other people as well ? > That looks correct. scsi_cd.h was recently removed from the scsi system. Ken > Index: patches/patch-plat_openbsd_c > ==