Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-11 Thread Frank Groeneveld
On 11/09/15 17:51, Amit Kulkarni wrote: I asked the upstream author privately, and he said that if you prefer the stock qt4 or the "unpatched" as he calls it, you can switch as well to the qt5 in ports. Thanks for bringing that to my attention! It does compile and seems to run fine against

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Frank Groeneveld < frank+openbsd-po...@frankgroeneveld.nl> wrote: > On 11/09/15 17:51, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > >> I asked the upstream author privately, and he said that if you prefer the >> stock qt4 or the "unpatched" as he calls it, you can switch as well to the

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-09 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Frank Groeneveld < frank+openbsd-po...@frankgroeneveld.nl> wrote: > On 11/04/15 22:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> Done. (I also added a blank line before the COMMENT). >> > > Thank you! > > Seems pretty common for Qt things unfortunately. phantomjs needs a >>

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-05 Thread Frank Groeneveld
On 11/04/15 22:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: Done. (I also added a blank line before the COMMENT). Thank you! Seems pretty common for Qt things unfortunately. phantomjs needs a patched Qt too, calibre uses private interfaces so it needs a :patch target to find the headers... Yes, I saw the

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/11/04 21:48, Frank Groeneveld wrote: > On 11/03/15 21:59, Landry Breuil wrote: > > That reads good to me - minor nit, if you run make update-plist it > > should remove the man/ man/man1/ dirs from the PLIST which i think are > > not needed. > > Thanks for the feedback, I've done this and

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-04 Thread Frank Groeneveld
On 11/03/15 21:59, Landry Breuil wrote: > That reads good to me - minor nit, if you run make update-plist it > should remove the man/ man/man1/ dirs from the PLIST which i think are > not needed. Thanks for the feedback, I've done this and the updated PLIST is in the tarball attached. On

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-04 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Landry Breuil writes: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:53:21PM +0100, Frank Groeneveld wrote: >> On 10/31/15 16:47, Frank Groeneveld wrote: >> >Ping? >> > >> >It's quite a simple port which only takes a few minutes to build on my >> >machine. You can then test it by running

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-03 Thread Frank Groeneveld
On 10/31/15 16:47, Frank Groeneveld wrote: Ping? It's quite a simple port which only takes a few minutes to build on my machine. You can then test it by running something like: wkhtmltopdf http://www.openbsd.org/ openbsd.pdf Frank As noted by somebody off-list, it might be useful to have the

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-11-03 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:53:21PM +0100, Frank Groeneveld wrote: > On 10/31/15 16:47, Frank Groeneveld wrote: > >Ping? > > > >It's quite a simple port which only takes a few minutes to build on my > >machine. You can then test it by running something like: > >wkhtmltopdf http://www.openbsd.org/

Re: NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-10-31 Thread Frank Groeneveld
On 10/23/15 22:27, Frank Groeneveld wrote: This is my first attempt at writing a port. wkthmltopdf is a program that uses Webkit to convert an HTML file to a PDF or image file. More information can be found on their website: http://wkhtmltopdf.org I use it in a number of Ruby on Rails

NEW: textproc/wkhtmltopdf

2015-10-23 Thread Frank Groeneveld
This is my first attempt at writing a port. wkthmltopdf is a program that uses Webkit to convert an HTML file to a PDF or image file. More information can be found on their website: http://wkhtmltopdf.org I use it in a number of Ruby on Rails applications with the wickedpdf gem to generate