On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:26:22PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Tue 13/02/2018 20:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:58PM +, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > On Tue 13/02/2018 20:01, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Björn
On 2018/02/13 20:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:58PM +, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Tue 13/02/2018 20:01, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > > Diff below brings potamus to the latest version. While
...
Clear! Until I understand the internals better I'm not going to start
the effort.
Attached a new diff without the SEPARATE_BUILD bit.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/audio/potamus/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:58PM +, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Tue 13/02/2018 20:01, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > Diff below brings potamus to the latest version. While here add
> > > SEPARATE_BUILD=Yes to Makefile.
> >
> >
On Tue 13/02/2018 20:01, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > Diff below brings potamus to the latest version. While here add
> > SEPARATE_BUILD=Yes to Makefile.
>
> What is it with this ? I see you're adding it to Makefiles, is there a
>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> Diff below brings potamus to the latest version. While here add
> SEPARATE_BUILD=Yes to Makefile.
What is it with this ? I see you're adding it to Makefiles, is there a
particular reason for it ? If it's *better* generally, then
Diff below brings potamus to the latest version. While here add
SEPARATE_BUILD=Yes to Makefile.
Tested OK by Rage Against The Machine
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/audio/potamus/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
Hi ports --
Attached is a new port, audio/potamus. Potamus is a lightweight GTK+2
audio player designed to use your filesystem to sort music, rather than
a complex database.
Works well for me on amd64 and macppc.
OK?
~Brian
potamus.tgz
Description: Binary data
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:14:59PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
This audio player does indeed have quite a minimal UI (as advertised).
It lacks a couple of features I'd like (queue, repeat, search in track list,
scroll track list if mouse wheel is used on it), so I'm not sure yet
if will
This audio player does indeed have quite a minimal UI (as advertised).
It lacks a couple of features I'd like (queue, repeat, search in track list,
scroll track list if mouse wheel is used on it), so I'm not sure yet
if will replace XMMS for me. But it's quite close. And the code looks
fairly sane
10 matches
Mail list logo