I am trying again to get this commited.
Is there something I can do to increase the amount of fsck given,
or is there actually objections to this?
Jan
port-opencore-amr-0.1.3.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
While I was trying to get this commited, a new version came out.
So here goes: AMR, an implmentation of the Adaptive Multi Rate
speech codec, version 0.1.3.
Comments? OK?
Jan
port-opencore-amr-0.1.3.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
This is a port of opencore-amr, an implementation
of the Adaptive Multi Rate speech codec.
http://opencore-amr.sourceforge.net/
(This has been reviewed a few times, and occasionally OK'd,
but I never got anyone to actually commit it.)
Jan
port-opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
Description:
On Jan 02 13:18:25, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 20 22:34:46, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 16 11:16:48, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 13 20:55:01, Jan Stary wrote:
Are there further comments or objections to commiting this?
Is there something else I need to do
for someone with commit rights to
On Dec 20 22:34:46, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 16 11:16:48, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 13 20:55:01, Jan Stary wrote:
Are there further comments or objections to commiting this?
Is there something else I need to do
for someone with commit rights to consider this?
Is it the Christmass or
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Dec 16 11:16:48, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 13 20:55:01, Jan Stary wrote:
Are there further comments or objections to commiting this?
Is there something else I need to do
for someone with commit rights to consider this?
Is
On Dec 16 11:16:48, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 13 20:55:01, Jan Stary wrote:
Are there further comments or objections to commiting this?
Is there something else I need to do
for someone with commit rights to consider this?
Is it the Christmass or is there simply zero interest in this?
On Dec 13 20:55:01, Jan Stary wrote:
Are there further comments or objections to commiting this?
Is there something else I need to do
for someone with commit rights to consider this?
Thank you
Jan
audio/sox
graphics/ffmpeg
multimedia/avidemux
multimedia/gstreamer-0.10 (plugins-bad and plugins-ugly)
The above seem to not be broken (or in fact influenced)
by the presence of opencore-amr as installed from the port
(as attached) - see previous posts.
The tests described in my previous
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
Is this OK?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_Multi-Rate_audio_codec#Licensing_and_patent_issues
# Apache 2.0
PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = patents, http://www.voiceage.com/amr_licterms.php
PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= patents,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37:38PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
Once gstreamer/core is installed and I try to build
streamer/plugins-bad, the build stops with
=== Verifying specs: glib-2.0 gmodule-2.0 gobject-2.0 gthread-2.0 xml2 z m
pcre gstreamer-0.10 intl=5 iconv=6 glib-2.0 gmodule-2.0
On Jul 01 17:01:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The following ports are very likely to pick this up:
audio/sox
graphics/ffmpeg
multimedia/avidemux
multimedia/gstreamer-0.10 (plugins-bad and plugins-ugly)
These need to be built with opencore-amr already installed and checked as
to whether
On Dec 10 22:37:38, Jan Stary wrote:
I am trying again to get this AMR port commited:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
On Dec 10 14:06:27, Marc Espie wrote:
There's been some recent confusion as to which version of a patch someone
was referring to, because it was an
Replying to an old thread when I finally got around to it,
I am trying again to get this AMR port commited:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
Meanwhile, I have found that David Coppa tried to
get this in before (and later OK'd my attempt):
On Jul 03 21:11:22, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
It comes with the Apache License 2.0; I am not sure
what that means for the PERMIT_* variables; I asked
upstream, but someone here surely knows.
AMR
On 2011-07-01, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 01 18:09:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-01, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
It builds fine with USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
Yes it does. Thank you.
I didn't know I could use USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
I forgot to comment on this earlier; it's
On Jul 01 17:01:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
multimedia/avidemux
This seems to ignore the installed opencore-amr libraries,
but has no ./configure options to explicitly disable them.
It uses its own libamr.c then.
Does that mean that avidemux is safe from the possible opencore-amr
import? Is
On 03/07/11 3:46 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jul 01 19:08:47, Brad wrote:
On 01/07/11 6:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
audio/sox
I will take care of audio/sox. In fact, I have an update for
audio/sox ready, as my main motivation for porting AMR was
to have AMR functionality in SoX.
Make sure to
On Jul 03 13:24:43, Brad wrote:
On 03/07/11 3:46 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jul 01 19:08:47, Brad wrote:
On 01/07/11 6:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
audio/sox
I will take care of audio/sox. In fact, I have an update for
audio/sox ready, as my main motivation for porting AMR was
to have AMR
On Jul 01 17:01:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-01, Giovanni Bechis giova...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 07/01/11 15:39, David Coppa wrote:
To anyone who wants to import it, you have my ok.
Enable regression test as well, ok for me.
The following ports are very likely to pick this
On 03/07/11 1:52 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
Why? Sox 14.3.2 comes with GPLv2, the sox libraries come with LGPLv2.1.
Then the SoX license marker in the port should also be updated to add
the missing LGPL license too.
Now it contains new functionality of the opencore-amr that comes with
Apache
On Jul 03 15:11:49, Brad wrote:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Thanks, that's what I've been missing.
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
It comes with the Apache License 2.0; I am not sure
what that means for the PERMIT_* variables; I asked
upstream, but someone here surely knows.
AMR is patent-encumbered. We may not be able to put this on
On Jun 29 21:35:25, Jan Stary wrote:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
This is a port of opencore-amr, which is an implementation
of the Adaptive Multi Rate speech codec that seems to be
used by many modern mobile devices (such as my android).
(This is my first new port -
On 07/01/11 13:05, Jan Stary wrote:
(2)
With USE_LIBTOOL=Yes, the build fails in a strange way (see below).
Without USE_LIBTOOL, everything goes fine. But I don't know enough
about libtool to spot the exact problem (see my guess below, though).
It builds fine with USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
Cheers
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jun 29 21:35:25, Jan Stary wrote:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
This is a port of opencore-amr, which is an implementation
of the Adaptive Multi Rate speech codec that seems to be
used by many modern mobile devices (such
On Jun 29 21:35:25, Jan Stary wrote:
This is a port of opencore-amr, which is an implementation
of the Adaptive Multi Rate speech codec that seems to be
used by many modern mobile devices (such as my android).
(This is my first new port - please be gentle.)
The main motivation is to have
What exactly does the 0.0 mean in SHARED_LIBS?
SHARED_LIBS += opencore-amrnb 0.0
SHARED_LIBS += opencore-amrwb 0.0
Running 'make plist' suggests this; but if I build the software natively
(outside of the ports), the libraries are built and installed as *.so.0.2
Why is the above better
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011, Jan Stary wrote:
What exactly does the 0.0 mean in SHARED_LIBS?
SHARED_LIBS += opencore-amrnb 0.0
SHARED_LIBS += opencore-amrwb 0.0
Running 'make plist' suggests this; but if I build the software natively
(outside of the ports), the libraries are built and
On Jul 01 14:41:24, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011, Jan Stary wrote:
What exactly does the 0.0 mean in SHARED_LIBS?
SHARED_LIBS += opencore-amrnb 0.0
SHARED_LIBS += opencore-amrwb 0.0
Running 'make plist' suggests this; but if I build the software natively
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
OK, thanks. It is now in the port.
Further comments?
Yes. You cannot sort stuff as you like.
Please, try to follow /usr/ports/infrastructure/templates/Makefile.template
ciao,
david
On Jul 01 15:09:03, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
OK, thanks. It is now in the port.
Further comments?
Yes. You cannot sort stuff as you like.
Please, try to follow /usr/ports/infrastructure/templates/Makefile.template
It is in the
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 01 15:09:03, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
OK, thanks. It is now in the port.
Further comments?
Yes. You cannot sort stuff as you like.
Please, try to follow
On 07/01/11 15:39, David Coppa wrote:
To anyone who wants to import it, you have my ok.
Enable regression test as well, ok for me.
Cheers
Giovanni
opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
On 2011-07-01, Giovanni Bechis giova...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 07/01/11 15:39, David Coppa wrote:
To anyone who wants to import it, you have my ok.
Enable regression test as well, ok for me.
The following ports are very likely to pick this up:
audio/sox
graphics/ffmpeg
multimedia/avidemux
On 2011-07-01, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
It builds fine with USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
Yes it does. Thank you.
I didn't know I could use USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
I forgot to comment on this earlier; it's available in cases where
something doesn't package with ports libtool and a fix can't be
found, but
On Jul 01 18:09:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-01, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
It builds fine with USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
Yes it does. Thank you.
I didn't know I could use USE_LIBTOOL=gnu.
I forgot to comment on this earlier; it's available in cases where
something doesn't
On Jul 01 17:01:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-01, Giovanni Bechis giova...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 07/01/11 15:39, David Coppa wrote:
To anyone who wants to import it, you have my ok.
Enable regression test as well, ok for me.
The following ports are very likely to pick this
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jul 01 17:01:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-01, Giovanni Bechis giova...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 07/01/11 15:39, David Coppa wrote:
To anyone who wants to import it, you have my ok.
Enable regression test as well,
On 01/07/11 6:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
audio/sox
I will take care of audio/sox. In fact, I have an update for
audio/sox ready, as my main motivation for porting AMR was
to have AMR functionality in SoX.
Make sure to update the license marker in the Makefile to
GPLv3+.
graphics/ffmpeg
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
This is a port of opencore-amr, which is an implementation
of the Adaptive Multi Rate speech codec that seems to be
used by many modern mobile devices (such as my android).
(This is my first new port - please be gentle.)
The main motivation is
41 matches
Mail list logo
