Michael Orlitzky put forth on 12/5/2009 1:38 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I can't figure out why my whitelist entry for 204.238.179.0/24 is being
ignored. If not for a transient DNS failure this afternoon I'd not have
known this was broken. The check_client_access whitelist entry _should_
have
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
Did you mean check_helo_access?
Stefan
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
reject_invalid_helo_hostname
Stefan Förster put forth on 12/5/2009 5:46 AM:
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
Did you mean check_helo_access?
What does this have to do with the question I asked? How would
Hallo Stan,
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Stefan Förster put forth on 12/5/2009 5:46 AM:
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
Did you mean check_helo_access?
* Stefan Förster cite+postfix-us...@incertum.net:
Rejection message:
| Dec 4 13:39:15 greer postfix/smtpd[7124]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
| unknown[204.238.179.8]: 450 4.7.1 mx1.mfn.org: Helo command rejected:
| Host not found; from=spam-l-boun...@spam-l.com
| to=s...@hardwarefreak.com
Yes,
i solved problem using how result_attribute a single-valued attribute.
Thanks
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:57:07AM +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
result_attribute = domains
result_format = [127.0.0.1]:2501
expansion_limit = 1
But i have:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.5.7 and having some trouble with the server
domain being appended to incomplete sender addresses. I have set
# postconf|grep -e rewrite -e append -e myorigin -e mydomain -e local_header
append_at_myorigin = yes
append_dot_mydomain = no
Ed W wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.5.7 and having some trouble with the server
domain being appended to incomplete sender addresses. I have set
# postconf|grep -e rewrite -e append -e myorigin -e mydomain -e local_header
append_at_myorigin = yes
William Jordan a écrit :
[snip]
Thanks /dev/rob0 I am searching through the archives now. What is odd is
that this is not reproducible nor is it affecting any other user with
Outlook 2003.
check the configuration of outlook. make sure it is configured to
authenticate.
consider enabling
Stefan Förster put forth on 12/5/2009 6:16 AM:
Whitelist doesn't trigger because you are performing a check for the
value of the RCPT TO parameter, not the HELO or EHLO.
If this isn't what you were looking for I don't have any idea what
your question is.
You're not seeing the forest for
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
I can't figure out why my whitelist entry for 204.238.179.0/24 is being
ignored. If not for a transient DNS failure this afternoon I'd not have
known this was broken. The check_client_access whitelist entry _should_
have triggered before
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Stefan Förster put forth on 12/5/2009 6:16 AM:
Whitelist doesn't trigger because you are performing a check for the
value of the RCPT TO parameter, not the HELO or EHLO.
If this isn't what you were looking for I don't have any idea what
your question is.
You're
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Two classes before smtpd_helo_restrictions should have triggered
accepting the email. The message should have never made it to the HELO
checks. It should have been accepted in smtpd_client_restrictions or
smtpd_sender_restrictions. Both classes come
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michael Orlitzky put forth on 12/5/2009 1:38 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I can't figure out why my whitelist entry for 204.238.179.0/24 is being
You rejected the HELO hostname, not the IP address. What is
reject_unknown_helo_hostname going to do when your DNS is broken?
Ed W:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.5.7 and having some trouble with the server
domain being appended to incomplete sender addresses. I have set
# postconf|grep -e rewrite -e append -e myorigin -e mydomain -e
local_header
append_at_myorigin = yes
Ed W:
To clarify the question - the goal is if someone connects via the
network (not local sendmail command) and the transcript says RCPT TO:
asdf that this is subsequently bounced as being an invalid
To summarize my other response, by definition an address without
domain delivers to the
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
To clarify the question - the goal is if someone connects via the
network (not local sendmail command) and the transcript says RCPT TO:
asdf that this is subsequently bounced as being an invalid
To summarize my other response, by definition an address
Ed W a écrit :
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
To clarify the question - the goal is if someone connects via the
network (not local sendmail command) and the transcript says RCPT TO:
asdf that this is subsequently bounced as being an invalid
To summarize my other response, by
I am trying to force submission (with SMTP auth via SASL) clients on tcp/587 to
use TLS. Is there anyway to do this? I ran
across smtp_enforce_tls, but this seems to force any and all SMTP clients to
use TLS which is not what I want (this is a
public facing machine).
Will I need to implement
Terry L. Inzauro wrote:
I am trying to force submission (with SMTP auth via SASL) clients on tcp/587
to use TLS. Is there anyway to do this? I ran
across smtp_enforce_tls, but this seems to force any and all SMTP clients to
use TLS which is not what I want (this is a
public facing
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:36:06 +
Ed W li...@wildgooses.com replied:
If this is not possible then can I please make a feature request for
this? At least in the case of my users it's almost exclusively a typo
(autocomplete gremlin due to Microsoft email programs..) and not
intended for
Ed W:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
To clarify the question - the goal is if someone connects via the
network (not local sendmail command) and the transcript says RCPT TO:
asdf that this is subsequently bounced as being an invalid
To summarize my other response, by
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:54:01PM +0100, Stefan F??rster wrote:
Now, about logging - I'd be really grateful if the existing logging
functionality could be extended in a way so that the pre-queue
content filter's response is logged.
I know that it is actually the content filter's job to log
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 05:34:03AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You'll likely have to go for the fruit at the top of the tree to
get the right answer. I've been on the top branch all day and
can't figure it out, thus my email to the list.
Climb down from the tree. Your answer was among the
mouss put forth on 12/5/2009 7:50 AM:
you need to read the docs :)
Isn't that always the case here. :)
an OK in an smtpd_foo_restrictions skips further checks in _that_
restriction. so an OK in smtpd_client_restrictions skips further checks
and goes to smtpd_helo_restrictions.
Aha! Thanks
Stefan Förster put forth on 12/5/2009 8:51 AM:
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Two classes before smtpd_helo_restrictions should have triggered
accepting the email. The message should have never made it to the HELO
checks. It should have been accepted in smtpd_client_restrictions or
Michael Orlitzky put forth on 12/5/2009 9:03 AM:
I think what you mean to do here is check_client_access (as opposed to
check_recipient_access). You could also use check_helo_access, but then
you'd have to add that machine's HELO hostname to the access map.
The reason for the
Sahil Tandon put forth on 12/5/2009 1:49 PM:
Why the hostility?
Frustration, lack of rest, likely. Apologies.
The others are just trying to help. :) Mouss
already answered your question correctly, but you should review:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html to understand how
/dev/rob0 put forth on 12/5/2009 8:44 PM:
This post might seem like a gratuitous me-too, and it partly is, but
the thing that concerned me, as one of the people responsible for
the Spam-L list, was the rejection, in the original post:
Dec 4 13:39:15 greer postfix/smtpd[7124]: NOQUEUE:
29 matches
Mail list logo
