Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path: MAILER-DEAMON
AFAIK the return-path above is invalid, as there is only the
Raffael Schmid put forth on 12/7/2009 4:10 AM:
Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path: MAILER-DEAMON
Hi
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path: MAILER-DEAMON
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
Already read this and I also would know how to do this. But I thought
maybe
Raffael Schmid:
Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path: MAILER-DEAMON
AFAIK the return-path above is
Hi all,
I
have a problem with postfix, I have my postfix set up on the domain a.com and
am getting in the queue of emails incoming email for example
the domain from u...@b.com to u...@c.com, the domain b.com and c.com
with and are not part of domains that postfix has served as an area. I
was
On 12/7/2009 4:10 AM, Raffael Schmid wrote:
Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path:MAILER-DEAMON
AFAIK the
On 12/7/2009 7:12 AM, Ricardo Barbosa wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with postfix, I have my postfix set up on the domain
a.com and am getting in the queue of emails incoming email for example
the domain from u...@b.com to u...@c.com, the domain b.com and
c.com with and are not part of domains
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:10:15AM +0100, Raffael Schmid wrote:
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path: MAILER-DEAMON
Almost certainly the actual envelope sender was MAIL FROM:, and
the MAILER-DAEMON was
Hi all,
I've found, it can be done by setting always_bcc, but it would also make
copies of normally received mail and locally sent one, right? If so, how can
only relayed mail be saved as a local copy on relay host?
Thanks...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Like this?
Dec 5 20:15:25 server postfix/smtpd[16712]: proxy-accept:
END-OF-MESSAGE: 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 91BE3547AFE;
from=sen...@example.com to=recipi...@example.com proto=ESMTP
helo=client.example.com
(with the same form for proxy-reject
Hi everyone,
I have two relay servers currently working with load balancing. I want
to configure both servers so that each MX relays only certain domain and
the rest of the mail throws it to the other MX. Here is the idea:
I want one MX to get all the mail and throw to the other MX all the mail
Zitat von Javier Henderson jav...@kjsl.org:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure
of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com
to u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP
On 12/7/2009 1:07 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure of the
LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com to
u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/7/2009 1:07 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure of the
LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve
* Mark Martinec mark.martinec+post...@ijs.si:
On Sunday 06 December 2009 13:11:16 Stefan Foerster wrote:
2. The number of SMTP proxy processes busy talking to Postfix went
down from 16.44 to 8.73 (5s resolution) - that's a completely
unexpected result, possibly flawed by the small data sample.
Zitat von Javier Henderson jav...@kjsl.org:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/7/2009 1:07 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the
failure of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine,
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
/dev/rob0 put forth on 12/5/2009 8:44 PM:
This post might seem like a gratuitous me-too, and it partly is, but
the thing that concerned me, as one of the people responsible for
the Spam-L list, was the rejection, in the original post:
Dec 4 13:39:15 greer
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
mouss put forth on 12/5/2009 7:50 AM:
you need to read the docs :)
Isn't that always the case here. :)
an OK in an smtpd_foo_restrictions skips further checks in _that_
restriction. so an OK in smtpd_client_restrictions skips further checks
and goes to
Javier Henderson:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the
failure of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com
to u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP server dies or becomes
Sta[snip]
Sanity checking and ease of troubleshooting is precisely why I'd kept
them separated for years, so each check type was in its respective class
heading. I guess given the things I'm doing with my static lists, it
makes no sense to continue my current method, given it makes the
mouss put forth on 12/7/2009 3:52 PM:
I'm looking through you, where did you go:
s...@hardwarefreak.com: host greer.hardwarefreak.com[65.41.216.221]
said: 554 5.7.1 imlil.netoyen.net[91.121.103.130]: Client host
rejected: Access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)
It is nice to not
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
mouss put forth on 12/7/2009 3:52 PM:
I'm looking through you, where did you go:
s...@hardwarefreak.com: host greer.hardwarefreak.com[65.41.216.221]
said: 554 5.7.1 imlil.netoyen.net[91.121.103.130]: Client host
rejected: Access denied (in
I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
I have this in main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
In the header_checks file, I have this:
/^From: .*someplace.org/ DISCARD
I did a 'postfix reload'
Messages from someplace.org are still being delivered.
On 2009-12-07 Christopher Adams wrote:
I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
I have this in main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
In the header_checks file, I have this:
/^From: .*someplace.org/ DISCARD
I did a 'postfix reload'
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Christopher Adams wrote:
I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
I have this in main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
In the header_checks file, I have this:
/^From: .*someplace.org/ DISCARD
I did a 'postfix reload'
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2009-12-07 Christopher Adams wrote:
I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
I have this in main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
In the header_checks file, I have this:
/^From:
Thank you for your helpful reply.
So, now I have this in main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist
I have a file sender_blacklist:
m...@somplace.org/ REJECT
I issued the command 'postmap hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist'
I
Christopher Adams:
Thank you for your helpful reply.
So, now I have this in main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist
I have a file sender_blacklist:
m...@somplace.org/ REJECT
I issued the command 'postmap
Hi I am trying to make postfix to relay all mail except for the ones
going to a specific domain. For example I want to be able to make postfix
relay all mail except for domain .ca I was wondering if something like this
is possible or if there is anything like this: transport_maps.cf *.*
Okay, no more ignorant posts. I will give you all that I have based on the
protocol as spelled out.
1. Summary of the problem: attempting to ban an email address using a hash
map does not work. The message is delivered anyway.
2. Error messages: none
3. Logging: Maillog shows that the message
From: Christopher Adams adam...@gmail.com
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 5:00:37 AM
Subject: Re: header_checks not working correctly
Okay, no more ignorant posts. I will give you all that I have based on the
protocol as spelled out.
1. Summary of
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Christopher Adams wrote:
Okay, no more ignorant posts. I will give you all that I have based on the
protocol as spelled out.
1. Summary of the problem: attempting to ban an email address using a hash
map does not work. The message is delivered anyway.
Sorry, this is a
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, osm...@oc.quimefa.cu wrote:
Hi I am trying to make postfix to relay all mail except for the ones
going to a specific domain. For example I want to be able to make
postfix relay all mail except for domain .ca I was wondering if
something like this is possible or if
Okay, it is obvious that my approach to getting assistance is all wrong.
True, I did not understand the posting protocol, mainly because I don't post
often to this list. Yes, I did begin the posting with the subject of
header_checks. Some kind fellow gave me some assistance and I attempted to
try
From: Christopher Adams adam...@gmail.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 5:51:13 AM
Subject: Re: header_checks not working correctly
Okay, it is obvious that my approach to getting assistance is all wrong. True,
I did not understand the posting protocol, mainly
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Christopher Adams wrote:
Okay, it is obvious that my approach to getting assistance is all
wrong. True, I did not understand the posting protocol, mainly
because I don't post often to this list. Yes, I did begin the posting
with the subject of header_checks. Some kind
36 matches
Mail list logo
