Hello everybody.
I have a issue with postfix.
Consider the following scenario:
I telnet to my web server from another location (bar.com) and I start
executing commands.
Connected to foo.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 smtp1.foo.com ESMTP Postfix (GNU/Linux)
HELO bar.com
250
On 1/13/2010 8:33 AM, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
Hello everybody.
I have a issue with postfix.
Consider the following scenario:
I telnet to my web server from *another location (bar.com)* and I
start executing commands.
Connected to */foo.com/.*
Escape character is '^]'.
220
Zitat von Alexandru Florescu a...@acasa.ro:
Hello everybody.
I have a issue with postfix.
Consider the following scenario:
I telnet to my web server from another location (bar.com) and I start
executing commands.
Connected to foo.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 smtp1.foo.com ESMTP
On 13-Jan-2010, at 06:33, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
The odd thing is that this actually works. I can connect and send mails
spoofing the sender's address, despite my postfix configuration directives:
Your problem is not with postfix. Your problem is with thinking SMTP is
something it is not
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 9:46 PM:
I think it all ended well though? Except my problem still exists. :\
We know things break when that hosts sends mail to you. What happens when you
send mail to that host? Do you see the same disconnect problem or similar?
What were the results of
Am Montag 11 Januar 2010 15:08:05 schrieb Wietse Venema:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
Hi,
I'm trying to use header_checks in conjunction with a pcre map to
distribute certain mail traffic to certain outgoing transports. I've got
a setup like this:
--- main.cf snip ---
header_checks =
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, LuKreme wrote:
On 13-Jan-2010, at 06:33, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
The odd thing is that this actually works. I can connect and send mails
spoofing the sender's address, despite my postfix configuration directives:
Your problem is not with postfix. Your problem is with
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:35:19AM -0600, Wendigo Thompson wrote:
Postfix accepts mail from the
corporate mail server and delivers the message via a pipe alias to an
application that is then inserting the message into the database.
Your choice of delivery mechanism is unfortunate. It is far
Alexandru Florescu put forth on 1/13/2010 7:33 AM:
permit_mynetworks,
Is some option missing? What can I do to prevent this? I found it because I
received spam in this way.
Using postfix 2.3.3 on Centos 5.4.
I'm guessing your telnet client machine is
Dominik Schulz:
Am Montag 11 Januar 2010 15:08:05 schrieb Wietse Venema:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
Hi,
I'm trying to use header_checks in conjunction with a pcre map to
distribute certain mail traffic to certain outgoing transports. I've got
a setup like this:
--- main.cf snip ---
I'm guessing your telnet client machine is within mynetworks. If so, none
of
your other checks are valid and any/all mail sent via this telnet is thus
accepted regardless of mail from: forgery.
--
Stan
Hi Stan,
Actually my server was not from the same network. It's from home and it
Hi all,
I've got a setup with Debian Lenny, Postfix with MySQL(on a remote
server in the same LAN of the mail server) and Clamav+Spamassassin.
The original smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter setting was this one:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:02:38 +0100
Von: RaSca ra...@miamammausalinux.org
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Understanding Postfix and smtpd_recipient_restrictions priorities
Hi all,
I've got a setup with Debian Lenny, Postfix with MySQL(on a
On January 13, 2010 8:16:36 AM -0600 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 9:46 PM:
I think it all ended well though? Except my problem still exists. :\
We know things break when that hosts sends mail to you. What happens
when you send mail to that
Frank Cusack:
On January 13, 2010 8:16:36 AM -0600 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 9:46 PM:
I think it all ended well though? Except my problem still exists. :\
We know things break when that hosts sends mail to you. What happens
Il giorno Mer 13 Gen 2010 18:09:35 CET, Steve ha scritto:
[...]
I would suggest you to use proxy maps to lower the amount of connections to the MySQL backend.
And on the above smtpd_recipient_restrictions I would suggest to push reject_unlisted_recipient above all RBL checks since there is no
On 1/13/2010 12:32 PM, RaSca wrote:
Il giorno Mer 13 Gen 2010 18:09:35 CET, Steve ha scritto:
[...]
I would suggest you to use proxy maps to lower the amount of
connections to the MySQL backend. And on the above
smtpd_recipient_restrictions I would suggest to push
reject_unlisted_recipient
On January 13, 2010 12:27:02 PM -0500 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
Frank Cusack:
Contrary to what I said earlier, tcpdump is in fact interesting. I see
a 3 way handshake, and that's it. 10 minutes later, a reset. However
postfix logs a disconnect immediately. I do notice that
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:54:38PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
If anything decides prematurely that the connection is dead, it
is your operating system kernel not Postfix.
Unless of course postfix has a bug (heaven forbid).
I would like to suggest to the rest of the community on this list
Frank Cusack:
Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix does not send or receive network
packets. Instead, packets are handled by the TCP/IP implementation
in the operating system kernel.
If anything decides prematurely that the connection is dead, it
is your operating system kernel not Postfix.
That's exactly what I was looking for!
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of mouss
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 1:51 PM
To: postfix-users
Subject: Re: Postfix as an MTA question
Bucl, Casper a écrit :
Is postscreen supposed to always run with stress=yes?
Seems to me stress-adaptive behavior would be useful in
postscreen.
# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.7-20100102
# ps -aux|grep stress
postfix 19967 0.0 1.0 23508 15444 ?? I12:50PM
0:00.76 smtpd -t pass -u -o stress= -o
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:44:05PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Is postscreen supposed to always run with stress=yes?
Seems to me stress-adaptive behavior would be useful in postscreen.
postfix 20637 0.0 0.1 3028 1704 ?? Ss1:32PM 0:00.01 postscreen
-l -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress=yes
Noel Jones:
Is postscreen supposed to always run with stress=yes?
Seems to me stress-adaptive behavior would be useful in
postscreen.
The stress=yes setting indicates that a master.cf service is using
up all its process slots. It is applicable only for servers that
accept connections from
On 1/13/2010 2:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Noel Jones:
Is postscreen supposed to always run with stress=yes?
Seems to me stress-adaptive behavior would be useful in
postscreen.
The stress=yes setting indicates that a master.cf service is using
up all its process slots. It is applicable only
On January 12, 2010 4:19:50 PM -0500 Frank Cusack fcus...@fcusack.com
wrote:
I can't think of a scenario for ANY type of server that would *require*
multiple PTR records.
I coincidentally just came across such a case. zeroconf uses multiple
PTR records. Not in .in-addr.arpa zones, so you
Dear All,
What string or what configuration to use in postfix in order to not receive
any bounces at all. I mean incase there is a bounce it should not be
returned back to the sender who initiated the mail.
I am sure there is a way to achieve this in postfix
Rgds
Dhiraj
Dhiraj Chatpar put forth on 1/13/2010 3:21 PM:
Dear All,
What string or what configuration to use in postfix in order to not
receive any bounces at all. I mean incase there is a bounce it should
not be returned back to the sender who initiated the mail.
I am sure there is a way to achieve
Yes, But which parameter to use in order to stop bounces totally and how?
Pablo Picassohttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/pablo_picasso.html
- Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:59, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Dhiraj
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Dear All,
What string or what configuration to use in postfix in order to not receive
any bounces at all. I mean incase there is a bounce it should not be
returned back to the sender who initiated the mail.
I am sure there is a way to achieve this in postfix
See:
RFC
Dhiraj Chatpar put forth on 1/13/2010 3:31 PM:
Yes, But which parameter to use in order to stop bounces totally and how?
Please don't top post.
You may try commenting out the bounce daemon in master.cf and restarting
Postfix.
bounceunix - - - - 0 bounce
Hi,
After setting up postfix up on a ipv4/ipv6 dualstack machine I'm seeing
the following issue: connections on 127.0.0.1 (where my content_filter
re-injects mail) are logged as:
010-01-13T22:51:07+01:00 meredith-vmail postfix/smtpd[4772]: warning:
127.0.0.1: address not listed for hostname
How do i make the changes in postfix so that it stops sending out bounced
mail totally?
Jonathan Swifthttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/jonathan_swift.html
- May you live every day of your life.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:49, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Is it possible to # out the bounce line in master.cf? Will that stop all
bounces?
Samuel Goldwynhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/samuel_goldwyn.html
- I'm willing to admit that I may not always be right, but I am never
wrong.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:53, Dhiraj Chatpar
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Dear All,
What string or what configuration to use in postfix in order to not receive
any bounces at all. I mean incase there is a bounce it should not be
returned back to the sender who initiated the mail.
I am sure there is a way to achieve this in postfix
Wietse:
See:
Tom Hendrikx:
Hi,
After setting up postfix up on a ipv4/ipv6 dualstack machine I'm seeing
the following issue: connections on 127.0.0.1 (where my content_filter
re-injects mail) are logged as:
010-01-13T22:51:07+01:00 meredith-vmail postfix/smtpd[4772]: warning:
127.0.0.1: address not
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net wrote:
Hi,
After setting up postfix up on a ipv4/ipv6 dualstack machine I'm seeing
the following issue: connections on 127.0.0.1 (where my content_filter
re-injects mail) are logged as:
010-01-13T22:51:07+01:00 meredith-vmail
Wietse Venema wrote:
Tom Hendrikx:
Hi,
After setting up postfix up on a ipv4/ipv6 dualstack machine I'm seeing
the following issue: connections on 127.0.0.1 (where my content_filter
re-injects mail) are logged as:
010-01-13T22:51:07+01:00 meredith-vmail postfix/smtpd[4772]: warning:
Hi,
I have Postfix configured with delivery through virtual. Some users get
IMAP mailboxes and some users have their mail redirected elsewhere. I
have virtual_alias_maps set to a file like this:
f...@example.com foo...@gmail.com
...
I find that sometimes my mail is dropped by filters along the
Tom Hendrikx:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Tom Hendrikx:
Hi,
After setting up postfix up on a ipv4/ipv6 dualstack machine I'm seeing
the following issue: connections on 127.0.0.1 (where my content_filter
re-injects mail) are logged as:
010-01-13T22:51:07+01:00 meredith-vmail
Hi All,
As many of you may be aware, about a year ago I emailed the list
asking if anybody would be interested in taking over maintenance
of Pflogsumm. Several people volunteered. In the mean-time,
after un-loading a bit (basically taking a hiatus from anything
that resembled computer work in
Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on a new release even now. More information to
follow in a day or two.
That is great news - looking forward to your next release. It's a useful
tool indeed.
Joe
Joe put forth on 1/13/2010 9:35 PM:
Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on a new release even now. More information to
follow in a day or two.
That is great news - looking forward to your next release. It's a useful
tool indeed.
Seconded. I use it daily, although I'm probably a
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
What I want to do is rewrite the envelope sender such that it appears to
come from the left hand side of the alias map file, so a mail from
b...@gmail.com to f...@example.com would turn into a mail from
f...@example.com to
44 matches
Mail list logo
