Hi List,
would like to setup some statistics on my postfix server.
I know of these solutions:
web: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch
shell: qshape
All recommendations are welcome.
Thanks in advance :-)
~maymann
Am 04.01.2012 09:04, schrieb Michael Maymann:
Hi List,
would like to setup some statistics on my postfix server.
I know of these solutions:
web: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch
shell: qshape
All recommendations are welcome.
Thanks in advance :-)
~maymann
i recently tested free
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a legitimate address, and we aren't really interested in getting
the bounces delivered to that
On 4/1/2012 10:04 πμ, Michael Maymann wrote:
All recommendations are welcome.
As has been discussed in the past, pflogsumm + mailgraph is a very
effective combination.
See:
http://www.howtoforge.com/postfix-monitoring-with-mailgraph-and-pflogsumm-on-debian-lenny
(Earlier discussion:
Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a legitimate address, and we aren't really interested in
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying to
From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both the list
and the sender personaly. But why should I reply to the sender
personaly? Could
On 01/04/2012 03:29 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our subscribers through phplist
from a
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:12:29 -0500
Sahil Tandon articulated:
I do not usually announce FreeBSD port version bumps here, but in this
case, I felt it appropriate. Sorry to those for whom this is not
relevant.
I have updated the development port to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20120102
and removed
Am 04.01.2012 12:46, schrieb rihad:
On 01/04/2012 03:29 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 12:01, schrieb rihad:
Hi, all. Can Postfix 2.8 be configured to skip generating bounce
messages in case there was a problem delivering the message?
Sometimes we need to send messages to our
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek ma...@fortech.cz said:
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying
to From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both
the list and
Sahil Tandon:
I do not usually announce FreeBSD port version bumps here, but in this
case, I felt it appropriate. Sorry to those for whom this is not
relevant.
I have updated the development port to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20120102 and
removed the erroneous conf/post-install patch that was
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:01:07 +0100
Erwan David articulated:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek
ma...@fortech.cz said:
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying
to From: address,
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:01:07 +0100
Erwan David articulated:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:37:53PM CET, Tomas Macek
ma...@fortech.cz said:
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button,
On 2012-01-04 6:37 AM, Tomas Macek ma...@fortech.cz wrote:
Hi list, is there any reason why the Reply-to: header is not set to
postfix-users in this list? When I press Reply button, I'm replying to
From: address, when pressing 'Reply to all', I'm replying to both the
list and the sender
Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers
switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't
recall the last time I saw a viral email attachment.
our barracuda saw 2929 in the last year
Greetings,
Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've tried
using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried manually
editing the Postfix config files by hand.
On 04-01-2012 00:14, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/3/2012 3:37 PM, Tolga wrote:
Hi,
I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to
me:
Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE:
reject: RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client
On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
Greetings,
Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've
tried using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried
manually
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gary Smith gary.sm...@holdstead.com wrote:
Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers
switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't
recall the last time I saw a
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:26:57 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source
antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix.
ClamAV hooks nicely into postfix with clammilter and smtp via clamsmtp
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:26:57 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source
antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix.
ClamAV hooks nicely into postfix with clammilter and smtp via clamsmtp
also wires in
I have a content_filter installed that pipes mail to a script that
invokes spamassassin. That's working fine. Relevant lines from
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamfilter:dummy
snip
spamfilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Rq
On 01/05/2012 12:02 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
I have a content_filter installed that pipes mail to a script that
invokes spamassassin. That's working fine. Relevant lines from
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamfilter:dummy
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:28:03AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 01/05/2012 12:19 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
These are very different functions.
Spam filtering is best achieved when mail is received, such as with
amavisd-new and
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:31:55 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:26:57 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a friend (who has very few money) an open source
antivirus scanner for email server that works with Postfix.
ClamAV hooks nicely into
Here's my Postfix configuration:
[root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_checks =
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were set twice,
the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's the new values:
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworkspermit_sasl_authenticated
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.orgreject_rbl_client
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
Here's my Postfix configuration:
[root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
snip
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
Greetings,
Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
the new values:
The list policy asks for postconf -n because that reports values
Postfix is actually
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
the new values:
The list policy asks for postconf -n
30 matches
Mail list logo
