On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> Maybe this is not the best practice, however I don't block any incoming mail
> (destined for a legit address) for the same reason. I use a program called
> SpamAssassin Quarantine and I let it scan for the spam.
>
content scanning every mess
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:17:26PM -0500, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>
>> If you want to give your client good advice, you will have to measure
>> their mail flow in a meaningful way.
>> How many messages per second, minut
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the comments.
>
> The reason why I said 256MB RAM, is because that is currently what my VM
> has...
>
> If I were to take out a dedicated server with:
>
> 2.8 Dual Core
> 2GB RAM
>
> how much would that han
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> How scaleable is postfix and dovecot, using mysql for user databases, on one
> server?
>
> My current server has 256MB RAM (It's a VM on slicehost). How many users do
> you think that will handle?
>
> How much RAM/CPU would
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:52 AM, dd1313 wrote:
>
> Hi GUys
>
> I am new to postfix, running unser ubuntu.I want to create a new email
> address.
> please help me do that
>
This is covered in the documentation. Maybe you can quote the
specific part you are having trouble with?
> Thanks
> Dev
>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I notice from time to time by checking my mail queue that messages get
> stuck there because users send to an invalid or non existing domain.
> My Postfix server attempts to hold the message in queue for later
> delivery assuming the remote
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> /dev/rob0 put forth on 11/10/2009 7:58 PM:
>> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 19:21:04 Chris Arnold wrote:
>>> OK, nothing stands out from pflogsumm.pl:
>>
>> Nothing?
>>
>>> Per-Day Traffic Summary
>>> date received delivered def
2009/10/4 Peter Macko :
> I have found a tutorial to configure postfix for:
>
> Internal emails:
> - Cannot send external emails
> - Can send internal emails
> - Can receive external emails
> - Can receive internal emails
>
> External emails:
> - Can send external emails
> - Can send internal email
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Ricky Tompu Breaky wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:41:14 +0300
> Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>>
>> > RB>sussy:/var/log # postfix -n
>> > postfix: invalid option -- 'n'
>> > postfix: fatal: usage: postfix [-c config_dir] [-Dv] command
>> > sussy:/var/log #
>>
>> postco
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:58 PM, pch0317 wrote:
> Hi
> Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
> If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
>
> Thanks
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?q=postfix+high+availability
and since you posted an identica
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/6/2009, Santiago Romero (srom...@servicom2000.com) wrote:
>> By adding the following to my main.cf, I'll check RCPT TO addresses
>> against primary MX, except when PRIMARY MX doesn't answer. In that case,
>> I'll accept any destination fo
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Paweł Ch. wrote:
> Hello,
> I want to _change_ MsExchange to Postfix in my corporation. I have 150 users
> in my network. They work in Outlook 2003. We are using Active Directory to
> authentification. Could you tell me what is the consequencies of making that
> chan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I am checking my mail queue and I have noticed that mail in my queue
> is stuck with the following error:
>
> AA83077925B 1508 Sun Jul 26 10:22:31 rheinl...@simulationinformation.com
> (host mx.dr1.us.army.mil[143.69.243.34] said: 451 #
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Mon, July 27, 2009 23:06, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
>
>> domain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
>> otherdomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
>> somedomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
>> mail.example.com. CNAME real.example.com.
>
> imho mx reco
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get my
> configuration correct to ensure there are no open relays.
> For obvious reasons I am not posting from the network
> concerned! I set out below
> 1. Details of test with abuse.net
> 2. mai
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Daniel L'Hommedieu
wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2009, at 15:32, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Tim Legg wrote:
>>
>>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>>> timothylegg.com. 9220 IN MX 10 mail.timothylegg.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> My hostname is genex.t
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/7/3 Gábor Lénárt :
>> Hei,
>>
>> Recently I am thinking of reimplementing our MX servers. Of course rcpt
>> check is a must, also I should not generate NDRs later, I should only accept
>
>
> Huh?
>
> This is all very standard behaviour f
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Rick wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Won't the mail just be forwarded to the primary mail server, who can
>>> reject it there?
>>
>> ... which then causes your server to generate a bounce to the (often
>> forged) envelope sen
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, wrote:
> At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
>>> @the.backed-up.domain.tld x
>>
>> Technically correct, but unwise.
>> You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
>
> why "must"?
>
> Won't the
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jonathan McMahon wrote:
>
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
>
> My general feedback:
>
> 1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search"
> documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I
> d
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Brett Dikeman wrote:
>
>> > I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I?set Postfix to
>> > accept
>> > email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
>> > acc
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Marky Yehezkiel (SNC)
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Is there any way to logging/record the activity pop3,IMAP when they deleted
> email via IMAP and POP3 ( outlook deleted email when outlook download it
> from server)
>
>
>
> I have problem when my customer he lost his em
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mischa Gresser:
>> Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: warning: Illegal address
>> syntax from qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26] in RCPT command: > 1231231...@xxx.ca <4034767...@crebifax.ca>>
>
> The RCPT command syntax is:
>
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Mischa Gresser wrote:
> Is this the correct log?
>
> Mar 20 10:13:01 hostname postfix/qmgr[15441]: 39F9BAD0063: removed
> Mar 20 10:13:31 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: connect from
> qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26]
> Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname postfix/smtpd[312
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Mischa Gresser wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. Sure thing on the logs.
>
> 20090320 22:42:55 38236 49A2055900086768 QUEUE
> From= Size=1203 Relay=192.168.xxx.xxx
>
> 20090320 22:42:55 38237 49A2055900086768 QUEUE
> Recipient=
>
> 20090320 2
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:54 PM, bharathan kailath wrote:
> hi al
> sorry for this posting; my earlier posting was incomplete as to the header
> details
> the following surprise me because postfix rejected this message! sill it
> managed to get into inbox; the postfix logs are there; the message
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:37:01AM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
>> > No not "using generic", rather using a table that returns a fixed output
>> > regardless of the input. The list of supported tables is still in the
>> > same place, and looking th
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Dave wrote:
>>
>> This problem only happens when I send email to r...@localhost.
>>
>> The email is re-addressed to d...@myolddomain.net, as so:
>>
>> to=, orig_to=
>>
>> There is no entry in aliases, generic, vi
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> > wrote:
&
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrote:
>>
>> > > Google is full of noise. Try:
>> > >
>> > >http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
>> > >http://www.postfix.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechS
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote:
>>>
>>> With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user")
>>> as u...@example.com
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> MountainX:
>> Like many other people today, I am aware of important environmental issues,
>> the breakdown of the health care system, the huge political changes taken
>> place now, the financial crisis, and other events that will have a huge
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Bruno GRANDJEAN wrote:
>>
>> thks for replying to me so quickly, I will add a:
>> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
>> in my /etc/postfix/main.cf
>> I already added :
>> reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org
>>
>> how can I reject mail from o
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Terry Carmen wrote:
>
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys, I believe that I already have the answer to this pretty basic
>> setup, but I just wanted to do a quick sanity check.
>>
>> I'm setting up a backup MX, and for one of the domains that it will relay
>> to, it sh
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:37 AM, mouss wrote:
> Adrian Overbury a écrit :
>> Does anyone here make use of the DNS Whitelist? If so, what's your
>> experience with it? Do you find it helpful in speeding up the delivery
>> of legitimate mail,
>
> I use it to avoid FPs, not to speed up delivery.
>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:04 AM, bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>
> I am actually working for an African country where the electricity is not as
> stable as one could expect - even in the infrastructure of the historical
> telco operator…
>
> With all the care that we have been abl
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Joey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Aaron Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:56 PM
>> To: Joey
>> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Re: Fina
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:37 PM
>>> To: Joey
>>> Subject: RE: Finally blocking some spam
>>>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Joey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:37 PM
>> To: Joey
>> Subject: RE: Finally blocking some spam
>>
>> What anti-spam measurements do you currently use?
>>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:45 PM, J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
>>
>>
>> Just to make sure I'm not crazy here, you can't get access to
>> http://www.okean.com ?
>>
>> Links to screenshots of what I see ( right now )
>> http://web56.net/images/download/screenshot1.jp
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:24 PM, MacShane, Tracy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Wolfe
>> Sent: Saturday, 11 October 2008 5:58 AM
>> To: postfix-users@postfix
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Wolfe escreveu:
>>
>> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[216.163.249.229]: 450 4.7.1 Client
>> host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [216.163.249.229]
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Aaron Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * Aaron Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Aaron Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We use reject_unknown_client to fail messages from hosts with no rDNS.
>
> That's wrong.
> reject_unknown_reverse_cl
Hello,
We use reject_unknown_client to fail messages from hosts with no rDNS.
We have a situation with the host 216.163.249.229, which give the
following results:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[216.163.249.229]: 450 4.7.1 Client
host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [216.163.249
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Johan Andersson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MailingListe wrote:
>>
>> Zitat von Johan Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are thinking to implement some form of greylisting at one of our
>>> sites and wonder which one of the many flavors out there
>
; -- Forwarded message --
> From: Aaron Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:55 PM
> Subject: Re: outgoing SPAM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Robert Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Robert Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past months there have been instances where pfishing was used to get
> account credentials and use the victim's account to send massive quantities
> of SPAM.
>
> Is there a way to configure postfix to detect such an ev
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The below isn't meant to shoot down your idea, but I'm an Open Source
> groupware developer and am very familiar with the Exchange-vs-XYZ
> equation.
>
>> As per the subject, I am about to pitch the idea of dumping Ex
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Marcel Grandemange
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a server that has one real ip and a virtual second ip.
>
> Both are connected to the same isp but have different addresses.
>
>
>
> The plan was one is used for all normall traffic but the second only for
> m
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Adam C. Mathews wrote:
>
>> Presenting using the following blacklists...
>>
>> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
>> psbl.surriel.com
>> zen.spamhaus.org
>>
>>
>> These do a good job for me, but I wanted to look for opi
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>
> Blocking outbound SMTP traffic from sources other than your mail server
>> will prevent you from being blacklisted, plain and simple, unless of course
>> you are sending
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>
> If your network is doing things to get itself blacklisted, fix the
>> problem! Filter outbound SMTP, cleanup your network clients, whatever.
>>
>
> Been there, don
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>
> What makes you think postfix is choosing the wrong interface?
>>
>
> The Received line added by the upstream mailserver receiving the test
> messages from this box
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> Because traffic from machines behind the box can cause the mailserver's IP
>> to be blacklisted, the mailserver machine has two IP addresses, one for the
>> mailserver, and one for NAT.
>>
>
> Ju
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a machine that is both a postfix mailserver, and a NAT router for a
> number of machines behind the box.
>
> Because traffic from machines behind the box can cause the mailserver's IP
> to be blacklisted
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luigi Rosa wrote:
>
>> Given a Linux server with three network cards:
>>
>>eth0: 192.168.1.1 (local LAN)
>>eth1: 20.20.20.20 (default GW, hi speed Internet, dynamic address)
>>eth2: 30.30.30.30 (Internet, reser
58 matches
Mail list logo
