Re: [SOLVED] Re: Submission runs very slowly

On 13/02/23 21:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:44:24PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 2/13/23 13:30, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: The apparent user name was "dnew...@networktest.com", and the password, though partly mangled, was something like:

Re: "parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for 127.0.0.2" at reboot, but not on manual systemctl start

On 29/07/2021 00:17, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-07-28 16:49:20 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: >> Thanks. I agree, Postfix should start up after the network is fully >> initialized. That includes all the network interfaces, and all the >> network infrastructure services. > > And the disks are

Re: batching all mails to one or more domains to a non-permanently-powered machine with dynamic addresses

On 29/01/2021 03:32, Hadmut Danisch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a new solution to solve a problem that was formerly > properly solved with UUCP over TLS for the last 15 years, but since UUCP > is really stone aged and not supported anymore, I'm looking for a > solution and didn't find one.

Re: Accessing the sending user from a canonical(5) table

On 28/10/2020 16:23, Wietse Venema wrote: > Viktor Dukhovni: >>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 11:42 PM, John Stoffel wrote: >>> >>> Could someone have an email address of "uid:j...@some.place.home" down >>> the line? >> >> The lookup key is a login name, given the syntax of the passwd(5) >> file, no ":"

Re: Raw postfix newbie here...

On 09/08/2020 18:29, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Yes, to varying degrees, but /etc/aliases is not entirely superfluous, > just best avoided when all you're doing is rewriting one email address > to another email *address*, with Postfix, that task is best handled in > virtual(5). Can you please

Re: Fwd: Bug#924183: postfix: Trust anchor files (tafile=) in TLS policy break secure level email delivery

On 10/03/2019 15:07, Wietse Venema wrote: > You are looking from the "we made improvements" angle. I am looking > from the "with hard work, we introduce 1 bug in 1000 lines of new > code" angle. > > In the TLS library there were 1039 additions and 559 deletions from > Postfix 3.3.3 to 3.4.1 (diff

Re: new strangeness with O365

On 5/17/18 3:59 PM, Mike Guelfi wrote: > Quoting Noel Jones : >> It seems counterproductive to rewrite a plain-text link...  I don't >> know it there's a setting in the O365 controls to avoid mangling >> plain text, so you may have to live with it. >> >> >> >>   -- Noel

Is reject_unknown_{reverse_}client_hostname safe?

Hello, I have been using smtpd_relay_restrictions = ... reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname warn_if_reject reject_unknown_client_hostname ... for a long while in my configuration, where the warn_if_reject is there because I thought that the more strict check could have blocked some

Re: Self-Generating Postfix Key & Cert?

On 16/10/17 15:19, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 10/16/17 14:50, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:00:00PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> >>> On 10/16/17 13:34, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: Anyone have handy the openssl commands to generate my own key and cert

Re: recommended smtp proxy script?

On 13/10/17 15:30, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 13.10.2017 um 20:42 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: >> On 13/10/17 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> the only important part is - you apparently should not use milter on >>> submission ports. >> >> Wh

Re: recommended smtp proxy script?

On 13/10/17 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > the only important part is - you apparently should not use milter on > submission ports. Why? Cheers, Dan

Recent upsurge of spam messages rate

Hello, this is not strictly Postfix related, but I don't know how to get in contact with a similar crowd of experienced folks. Please direct me to a more suitable mailing list, it one exist. In the last two weeks I've seen an upsurge of the rate to which spam messages are delivered to my domain

Re: Is not honoring bounces-to violation of RFC?

On 6/28/16 2:01 PM, Chip wrote: > My mistake NOT "bounces-to" rather "return-path" This is not a subtle difference. The Return-Path header gets added (or replaced, in the case it is already there) by the receiving MTA with the MAIL FROM address. It is placed there only for convenience of the

Re: Ignore envelope header

On 30/09/15 12:46, Ciaran Scolard wrote: > Is there a way to tell postfix to ignore an envelope header? > e.g. the TO: field. What should a mail transport agent do with messages for which it ignores the destination? It is not obvious to me. Cheers, Daniele

Re: Going through Google spam filters

On 26/07/15 22:43, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniele Nicolodi: Maybe this helps: Go to your Mail settings and Accounts tab and add the address you are forwarding from to 'Send mail as'. This is a new feature from user requests, where Gmail will detect that you forwarded from

Re: Going through Google spam filters

On 26/07/15 18:47, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniele Nicolodi: Currently I'm able to send emails to my address @gmail.com from the email address I'm currently using without having them classified as spam, but not from any email address having a different local part. I believe this is because my

Re: Going through Google spam filters

On 26/07/15 18:46, Raman Gupta wrote: And: 3) Make sure the reverse DNS for the IP you use to send mail is configured to point to your own domain and not your VPS provider's domain: dig -x ipaddress Regards, Raman On 07/26/2015 12:40 PM, Raman Gupta wrote: I have a similar setup

Re: Going through Google spam filters

On 26/07/15 19:59, DTNX Postmaster wrote: I would however have another look at your DNS configuration. Here's the relevant header; == Received: from zed.grinta.net (grinta.net [109.74.203.128]) by english-breakfast.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBED330874 for

Re: Going through Google spam filters

On 26/07/15 19:51, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniele Nicolodi: On 26/07/15 18:47, Wietse Venema wrote: Daniele Nicolodi: Currently I'm able to send emails to my address @gmail.com from the email address I'm currently using without having them classified as spam, but not from any email address

Going through Google spam filters

Hello, I apologize in advance because my problem is not strictly related to postfix, but I don't know another mailing list with helpful people with enough knowledge of the of the subject. I have my personal emails handled by my own setup hosted on a virtual private server. Since a while (I

Re: need input on user .forward file format

On 02/06/15 22:45, Sharon Stahl wrote: My problem is that when the .forward file only has just username, thismachine does not check the aliases file to see that it is the machine that keeps mail for that user. It adds @domain to the name and sends it off to our main NIS machine that answers

Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

Hello, I have a system with a few local users where some of them are configured for forwarding all incoming messages to external addresses via the use of .forward. One of those users forwards mail to an hotmail.com address. When mail is delivered to this address this is what happens: Oct 2

Re: Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

On 02/10/14 16:16, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 02.10.2014 um 16:10 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: I have a system with a few local users where some of them are configured for forwarding all incoming messages to external addresses via the use of .forward. One of those users forwards mail

Re: Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

On 02/10/14 16:22, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 02.10.2014 um 16:16 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: Am 02.10.2014 um 16:10 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: I have a system with a few local users where some of them are configured for forwarding all incoming messages to external addresses via the use

Re: Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

On 02/10/14 16:43, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 02.10.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: The connection to the delivery attempt from accounts.microsoft.com to grinta.net is correlated to the forwarding only by its timing what makes you sure that your outgoing mail and the incoming

Re: Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

On 02/10/14 16:49, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:10:04PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: Oct 2 13:50:59 zed postfix/smtpd[1063]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from bay004-omc1s27.hotmail.com[65.54.190.38]: 450 4.1.8 account-security-nore...@account.microsoft.com: Sender address

Re: how to protect MTAs from mass mails

On 20/08/2014 10:56, ml ml wrote: By default my postfix accepted those mails until it found out that the recipent does not exists. Then postfix tries to send back that 550 User Unknown error mail. I doubt that Postfix by default accepts mail for users it does not know about, but anyway...

Re: How to fetch From address from header via Postfix head_check?

On 05/08/2014 22:18, Xie, Wei wrote: For example, From: a...@yahoo.com To: test...@osu.edu (is forwarded to d...@hotmail.com) In header_checks, I use the rule /^To: (.*)/ PREPEND Resent-From: $1 to extract original recipient test...@osu.edu from the header of test emails and add one

Re: How to fetch From address from header via Postfix head_check?

On 05/08/2014 22:30, Xie, Wei wrote: Daniele, The To: header does not represent the recipient of a message. My understanding is To: header (test...@osu.edu) represents original recipient of a message, right? No. Look at this same message. I recommend you to document yourself a bit before

Re: Individual smtpd_tls_ask_ccert?

On 30/07/2014 15:07, BlueStar88 wrote: Am 30.07.2014 um 14:17 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi: One of the main features of the current email infrastructure is its interoperability and capability to work as a federated system. Therefore the adherence to the defined and deployed protocols is very

SPF and leboncoin.fr vs sfr.fr

Hello, this question is not strictly related to Postfix but I don't know where else I may find knowledgeable people to ask about the issue. leboncoin.fr is classifieds website and it offers the possibility to answer insertions through a web form that sends an email to the insertionist. The form

Re: SPF and leboncoin.fr vs sfr.fr

On 28/05/2014 17:30, Tom Hendrikx wrote: SPF is failing because the website using the email address entered at the website as the smtp envelope sender. The proper way to fix this issue is to convince the website owner to change their mail form. The easy way is to change your SPF record,

Re: SPF and leboncoin.fr vs sfr.fr

On 28/05/2014 17:19, Robert Schetterer wrote: you may set your SPF Record to ~all SoftFail Thanks Robert, I've done that. invest in dkim and dmarc What advantages would that bring to me? I implemented SPF just because otherwise the very big providers would threat messages originating

Re: Can't reject forged sender/from address only when using AfterLogic Webmail

On 01/04/2014 12:41, Pau Peris wrote: Not meant to offend, but Viktor, i'm still waiting for you knowledge to come around. And no, i'm not even asking you for a solution which obviously you don't know, but at least to come here and ask for excuses for you unfortunate behavior. This is the

Re: Make TLS errors hard, not soft

On 04/03/2014 10:24, Peer Heinlein wrote: And: It's not a spurprise and not a man made problem, but an interesting new use-case where we can provide additional mailadresses with TLS-encrypted SMTP (next hop)-transfer to/from the recipient's provider. Hello, just for the sake of curiosity,

Re: Stuck when trying to compiling source code on Debian

On 27/11/2013 15:10, Keith Steensma wrote: I trying to compile the Postfix (version 2.9.6) source code on a Debian stable (weezy) system. I have all the pieces like gcc, perl, and the other dependencies that are necessary. But I'm stuck with (at least) one dependency that I am missing.

Re: Getting automated sending feedback from SMTP server

On 31/10/2013 18:00, Sergio Mira wrote: My point is: how to get feedback from [SMTP Server] to know if my message was really sent or not? If the message cannot be delivered by the SMTP server, it will send a bounce message to the sender. To easily detect those bounces the standard technique is

Re: Relay Access Denied

On 28/10/2013 19:36, Tim Legg wrote: Attached is the postconf -n I've also been reading the link that Dr. Venema sent me. Could it be that the mydestination is incorrect? Could it be: mydestination = timothy.com, localhost.localdomain, localhost However, your configuration

Re: problem receiving from mx.191.biz

On 06/12/2012 13:08, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: Hi all, I have received a complaint from a customer thats sit on our server(postconf down below ) about not receiving a message from a particular sender domain @olmar.191.it Your customer in not able to receive emails from

Re: Mail forwarding loop

On 10/11/2012 23:58, Noel Jones wrote: On 11/10/2012 9:09 AM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: What I observe is that postfix is receiving messages containing a forged Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a mail forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces the messages, but those

Re: Mail forwarding loop

On 10/11/2012 17:52, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 16:09:24 +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: ... What I observe is that postfix is receiving messages containing a forged Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a mail forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces

Re: Mail forwarding loop

On 10/11/2012 11:16, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: It's difficult to know how you've set up your spam filter. Some more information would help more. On the machine i'm using now, I don't use postfix, but I do use spamassassin. I have procmail recipies that use spamc to filter the messages. On

Re: Mail forwarding loop

On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: / David Rees wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 14:59:01 -0800 / On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote: I think I have a problem with my simple mail server. I noticed several bounce mails in the queue, which postfix

Re: Mail forwarding loop

On 09/11/2012 10:35, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: / Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 10:06:14 +0100 / On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: If you want to use content filtering with postfix, you might have better results if you use amavisd-new + spamassassin + clamav. It's

Mail forwarding loop

Hello, I think I have a problem with my simple mail server. I noticed several bounce mails in the queue, which postfix in unable to deliver. C0B0160EC 12730 Thu Nov 8 12:35:47 MAILER-DAEMON (lost connection with eforward5.registrar-servers.com[38.101.213.202] while receiving the

Re: Mail forwarding loop

On 08/11/2012 23:21, Jeroen Geilman wrote: Postfix cannot detect a mail loop if it has never seen the message before. You are not re-injecting the filtered message, you are (or, rather, SA is) calling sendmail(1), which in turn invokes pickup(8): Nov 8 12:35:47 zed

Re: REJECT and save a copy of spam?

On 14/09/2012 16:46, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org said: Postfix supports Milter too. There are some differences but it might just work. Oh yeah, I know that (I just wrote a milter for some servers at work running postfix). I was trying to avoid

Re: [SPAM] Re: The ultimate email server

On 22/08/2012 18:47, Terry Barnum wrote: On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: On 21/08/2012 19:34, Mikkel Bang wrote: Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your advice I finally ended up with: OpenBSD + postfix-anti-UCE.txt + undeadly's spamd setup

Re: The ultimate email server

On 21/08/2012 19:34, Mikkel Bang wrote: Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your advice I finally ended up with: OpenBSD + postfix-anti-UCE.txt + undeadly's spamd setup (which includes greylisting+greytrapping) + dspam: https://gist.github.com/3417519 Feedback

Re: The ultimate email server

On 15/08/2012 14:09, Mikkel Bang wrote: Dropped: - postscreen: Looked into http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html but couldn't really find anything concrete to add to my setup Did you really read the documentation? What is not clear in this section

Re: The ultimate email server

On 15/08/2012 16:09, andr...@east.nilpan.se wrote: On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: On 15/08/2012 14:09, Mikkel Bang wrote: Dropped: - postscreen: Looked into http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html but couldn't really find anything concrete to add to my setup Did

Re: Next day

Hello Wietse, thank you for your straightforward response. I was absolutely not advocating a change in the development model of Postfix, I have no reason to think that the current one as any problem. I was merely inquiring about the choice about the way the Postfix source code is distributed.

Re: Next day

On 28/03/12 16:43, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Zitat von gdedousis1...@gmail.com: I use Postfix and is great. Thank you W! I send this becoz I got worried: If Wietse suddenly gets tired, retired etc what happens to Postfix? Any team/guys knowing Postfix well enough to keep

Re: Postfix Wildcard email forwarding

On 16/11/11 18:07, Mark2 wrote: That's what I would like to do: _re...@mymail.com -- re...@mymail.com _nore...@mymail.com -- nore...@mymail.com xxx_s...@mymail.com -- s...@mymail.com Is this format of the address a strict requirement? Otherwise, you can have them in the format

Re: executive parser

On 05/11/11 17:40, David Southwell wrote: Just to add weight to my last posting - the use of a as a critical symbol is really quite idiotic. What cannot be seen should never be that significant! Telling people, member of an affirmed community, that what they are currently doing is idiotic,

Re: executive parser

On 05/11/11 17:30, David Southwell wrote: The problem you identify in subsequent lines, has its roots in postfix's rather primitive formatting structure. If it were replace by something like: {submission (variant,modifier [connector] data ) (variant = data) (variant =

Python spamd client and spamc-milter

Hello, I had a look at spamass-milter and honestly I didn't like it much. The functionality it implements is simple but the implementation is quite convoluted in my opinion and involves Therefore I wrote a python spamd client (to avoid having to fork twice on each request) and python

Re: Using Spamassassin as content filter

On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote: I agree and that's exactly my current solution, but I have some questions regarding how I'm doing that. Without repeating myself, can you please have a look at my configuration in the mail that originated this thread and comment on my solution? I don't

Re: Using Spamassassin as content filter

Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated. I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply. On 20/10/11 12:08, Dennis Guhl wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote: http://wiki.apache.org

Re: Using Spamassassin as content filter

On 20/10/11 13:07, Dennis Guhl wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:27:27PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated. I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply. It looks quite good (at least to me as a native german). I

Re: Using Spamassassin as content filter

On 19/10/11 16:01, Kris Deugau wrote: Daniele Nicolodi wrote: Sieve can not call external programs, therefore I do not know ho to hook Spamassassin there, and, furthermore, I would like to avoid to have to setup things for each user. O_o News to me. Maybe there's some option to do

Re: Using Spamassassin as content filter

On 19/10/11 18:46, Tom Hendrikx wrote: Actually, there is an experimental extension for dovecot sieve that allows piping to external commands, but with a quite secure design (sysadmin controls which commands are available to the pipe extension). It works quite nice in the current state, and

Using Spamassassin as content filter

Hello, on the web there are several recipes to integrate Spamassassin with Postfix, but no one seems to me to be the definitive recipe. I think that this configuration is quite common (for low volume smtp servers) and would deserve a small space in Postfix official documentation, but maybe it is

Re: Using Spamassassin as content filter

Hello Kris, thank you for your comments. On 18/10/11 17:03, Kris Deugau wrote: Since you're happy to deliver the spam somewhere, rather than trying to reject it during the SMTP conversation, you're probably best off calling spamc early in your local-delivery rules rather than trying to