Am 09.07.2010 13:35, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error
bounces
Am 09.07.2010 16:13, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
On 7/9/2010 14:40, Ram wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:35 +0200, Administrator Beckspaced.com wrote:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks
about setting up Linux to use aliases
instead of basic IP0.
Any suggestions?
use smtp_bind_address=
to bind outgoing mail to an ip
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
and public.
Is there any other solution?
i am sure this can be fixed, but for now you send
to less info about your setup, what are you trying to goal
with running 2 instances of postfix?
2010/6/22 Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org:
Am 22.06.2010 10:40, schrieb nunatarsuaq:
I'm using
,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/backscatter_recipient_access
Again attention , you should analyse your logs and setup
to match setup like this to your needs
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
: Either I made a
weird mistake and have overseen something or there is a bug somewhere.
Jan-Kaspar
you should reject all .dynamic.hinet.net by access table
you will never miss mail
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
rbls
in my antispam chain
Andreas
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi,
there was/is a Problem with the denic .de root servers
this might give you some Problems with mail
it looks like that it is recent partly working again
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
—
www.springeronline.com http://www.springeronline.com
www.springer.com http://www.springer.com/
—
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
loop
with ARF with most providers etc in order to maintain a high
deliverability ratio. I am not willing to give the name of the
organisation so you will have to take my word for it.
i would prepare fallback_relays and special transports by
recipient domains
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert
-cluster-b1.one.com or mx-cluster-b2.one.com. But will give a timeout
when talking to that machine. So I want to redirect message to
mx-cluster-b1.one.com and mx-cluster-b2.one.com to mx2.youngguns.nl.
thanks,
Martijn
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
name
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 22.03.2010 21:53, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 22.03.2010 20:05, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
Hi Reinaldo,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
reinal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda facce...@gmail.com wrote:
Alternative to that patch? I
Am 22.03.2010 22:36, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer
rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
[snip]
1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/
I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a
line for each mailbox
or are you inventing problems?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 21.03.2010 00:16, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 19.03.2010 12:42, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Content filter overrides
Am 19.03.2010 12:42, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Content filter overrides transport_maps.
Wietse
Thx Wiestse for info
helpfull in client stage
rbls have their pros and contras everyone is free to use them as he likes
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Content filter overrides transport_maps.
Wietse
Thx Wiestse for info, such was i expected,
in my/this case its no urgent enough
to fix
very aware anyone including myself could create a RPM from
source using the SRPM's however I attempted this in the past and
failed miserably.
Simon's RPMs are online!
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.7/
hoping, suse gets them too in their build service, soon
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert
Hi Wietse, is their any
fixed release date for version 2.7 ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 08.02.2010 11:19, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
* Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org:
Hi Wietse, is their any
fixed release date for version 2.7 ?
famous last words ... :)
expected to hear when its ready *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
something like
SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1 OR
SELECT username FROM domain_admins WHERE username='%s' AND domain = '%d'
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 29.01.2010 14:57, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/29/2010 4:41 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi all,
i have a sasl mysql map matching existing users in mysql
SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1
this works nice
but now i need a query or chain
Am 29.01.2010 16:58, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 29.01.2010 14:57, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/29/2010 4:41 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi all,
i have a sasl mysql map matching existing users in mysql
SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1
Am 29.01.2010 17:24, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/29/2010 11:02 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 29.01.2010 16:58, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
things with union work but , the problem
seems to be the double result of equal entries
query = SELECT DISTINCT concat('@', domain
Am 29.01.2010 18:12, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:57:30PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
jep that query works
postmap -q rob...@schetterer.org
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sasl_login_maps-test.cf
@schetterer.org rob...@schetterer.org
This is the wrong result format
Am 29.01.2010 18:36, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:30:45PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
@domain.de username
which works as desired
As documented, in indexed files the first
Am 29.01.2010 18:49, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
@domain.de username
which works as desired
As documented, in indexed files the first
Am 29.01.2010 19:37, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 29.01.2010 18:49, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
@domain.de username
which works
Am 29.01.2010 23:13, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:06:51PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
this works
query = SELECT username FROM domain_admins WHERE domain='%d'
UNION SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1
Yes, a user can send mail
Am 21.01.2010 10:12, schrieb luca:
I tried but nothing in that page seems to help me
Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
Am 20.01.2010 12:48, schrieb luca:
Hi,
as i understand
http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
you can disable dsn
for the exchange ip
Use
://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
helps
Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
Am 20.01.2010 11:55, schrieb luca:
Hi,
I have a working postfix server from long time.
Now i found out that mails with a read receipt coming from one (and only
one) Exchange Server
are correctely delivered as well as thier read
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
and not supported by this list
it is in the vda patch
http://vda.sourceforge.net/ with its own list ask there for help and/or
read the faqs on their site
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 26.12.2009 15:20, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Hi @ll,
merry X-mas
i have a webserver with some customers
using binary sendmail command deliver out mail to local postfix from the
www-data apache with i.e perl scripts, by ignorance of the customers the
often dont debug
sendmail binary
like in i.e. smtpd
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
or are their any other good advices
for rejecting mail from sendmail binary with wrong recipient syntax or
domain?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert
thanks
-bharathan
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
to it.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_transport
http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
Geert
maildrop has good possibilities to exec external progs
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
, BINARYMIME) and have you considered to
add those functionalities to Postfix?
p...@rick
Hi Patrick,
its planed for dovecot
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Roadmap
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
postfix 2.6.5 rpms by my own
which run fine on 10.0 / 10.1 / 10.2 / 10.3
didnt test them on 11.0 / 11.1 but should run fine
postfix is very rpm rebuild friendly
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
servers ip on the
verification servers and they give a i.e 550 for not existing mail
adresses as well your server should do so after verification result,
therefor having a recipient list is the right way
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
for rejected requests (default: 450). The response is
always 450 in case of a temporary DNS error.
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
its own maillist
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
mouss schrieb:
Robert Schetterer a écrit :
Hi,
some nets have
set their ptr records to localhost
this causes problems to several mailservers
i see no problems at mine but
just asked to clear
dig -x 123.27.178.4
; DiG 9.3.5-P1 -x 123.27.178.4
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got
Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
i...@lynet.de schrieb:
Noel Jones schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
[...]
You can reject such clients with a check_reverse_client_hostname
access table. Make sure this is after permit_mynetworks so you don't
reject the real localhost.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
Noel Jones schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
i...@lynet.de schrieb:
Noel Jones schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
[...]
You can reject such clients with a check_reverse_client_hostname
access table. Make sure this is after permit_mynetworks so you don't
reject the real localhost.
http
this was warned by german heise pc magazin
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Namens-Trick-oeffnet-Mailserver--/meldung/143123
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Noel Jones schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi,
some nets have
set their ptr records to localhost
this causes problems to several mailservers
i see no problems at mine but
just asked to clear
dig -x 123.27.178.4
; DiG 9.3.5-P1 -x 123.27.178.4
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got
. But the blame will fall on the mail admin.
The mail was sent, YOU caused the server to reject it.
this is the postfix mail list,
the option make_world_a_better_place wasnt implemented yet *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
because my users are OpenLdap.
Ralf Hildebrandt said, is valid also.
--
Jose Alberto Pertuz
GNU-Linux user #452473
Caracas,Venezuela
58+414+1279657
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
to understand what are differences between exchange and
others you should understand exchange and outlook first too, which is
more difficult then clicking wizards on guis , this will give you the
needed basics for make decisions
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
://postmaster.msn.com/Guidelines.aspx
Gmail: no idea, found nothing but a dummy-user-faq
gmx
also needs reverse dns
http://faq.gmx.de/messages/email/optionen/antispam/1.html
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Jorey Bump schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote, at 08/03/2009 03:40 PM:
lost mail to where ? gone universe *g?
the mail got rejected at last with a debug code
so the sender may take his brain to fix its problem
or try to reach you by phone , valid mailservers etc
if the sender cant fix
=
[..]
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/freemail_check,
[..]
/(^|\.)provider\.tld$/ DUNNO
/./ REJECT You claim to be from
provider.tld but your mail didn't come from a provider.tld server.
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
-server-73/how-to-block-domains-postfix-684924/
HTH
Regards,
Serge Fonville
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
is forward and reverse should be se same as the hostname
and the helo
forget about multiple reverses, spamfilters i.e might do matches between
reverse and forward as well helo and hostname so you might get spam points
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentry
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
that comes with postfix admin
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
=/usr/bin/formail
...
SUBJECT=`formail -xSubject:
then you may short the subject with sed etc
you may ask on the procmail list, or maybe here is someone that has
better procmail knowledge
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
there may better options to solve
it, anyway i dont know any solution which operates with pst ( there
might be some exotic stuff out there)
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
mail
InterfreePEC - la tua Posta Elettronica Certificata
http://pec.interfree.it
---
try it as described using procmail starting an external script
but what are you trying to solve ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
?
submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
-o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
-o smtpd_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
-o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
-o smtpd_tls=yes
-o
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Robert Schetterer:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
-o smtpd_etrn_restrictions
tags it as spam
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
smtp level which normally is fine with any law problems, consider
to use rbls if possible )
after all, change the customer *g
I understand that legitimate users wouldn't be able to send themselves email,
but that fine with me.
best regards,
_Terry
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert
mailservers ip or
sasl user ( recommended )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
setup etc , so
test it before, and/or make backups, in a testing server ( vmware etc )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
.
Wietse
Hi Martin, after all most milters have option to whitelist hosts itself
why dont use it
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
) why cleanup do
not drop messages.
Can anyone idea? Milters are after cleanup?
Thanks
Jirka
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
.
-- spamc args: pass the remaining flags to spamc.
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
i have a three letter domain which is bombed since years from zombies
no feature got zombies out of the way, seems 3 letters are simply to
easy to type in bot programming, but others reported bots stopping after
a time
by whatever speculated reason
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany
will not find a solution with scaleable account levels
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
reject_unauth_destination
reject_unknown_client_hostname
... other UCE rules ...
-- Noel Jones
Hi,
using reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
is mostly save to use these days, as many big mail providers use it too
i.e gmx.de
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Hi @ll,
i have a relay for exchange
which is configured with reject_sender_login_mismatch
with accounts allowed to send out for configured domains
at last a infected host generated a faked sender
which was rejected with not owned by user
unfourtunally the bounce
then
this is the nature of backscatter
any idea how to stop bounce in that case
i thought of something like ( not the right syntax here only as
principal example)
discard Sender address rejected: not owned by user*
mails in /etc/postfix/header_checks
any better idea?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert
asked clamav developers to bring back
store in filesystem option, which makes it more easy to investigate
infected mails cause sometimes false positives happens
with anitpishing code etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 06:16:33PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
havening them in hold is a nice option
but i am thinking of a script
getting them out of hold and store
in the filesystem and clean up hold
Here's my suggestion:
- Create a second Postfix
your mails as spam
sometimes, or block you in total
even if you postfix has super optimal setup
(helo matches, spf, dkim etc )
the only thing helps is whitelisting
using their guis, their Antispam
systems are simply broken in my eyes
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
us...@example2.com
...
using reject_unlisted_recipient
is working with this setup
but maybe gurus have better advice
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
to
exclude specific hosts from blacklists. This feature is available in
Postfix 2.1 and later.
or combinations of both
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
mailaddresses only, instead of catch all ist better
anytime anyway
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
try search all
http://software.opensuse.org/search
you will find what you looking for mostly
tip use suse rep search link
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi @ll,
double checked this on different mailservers
on different nets , at current i cant deliver out mail to yahoo.de/com
anyone else notices same problems?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
mouss schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Gerard schrieb:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:09:16 +0100
Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
double checked this on different mailservers
on different nets , at current i cant deliver out mail to yahoo.de/com
anyone else notices same problems
Gerard schrieb:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:09:16 +0100
Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
double checked this on different mailservers
on different nets , at current i cant deliver out mail to yahoo.de/com
anyone else notices same problems?
Lacking a functioning crystal ball
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de tôba
Envoyé : mardi 11 novembre 2008 15:59
À : Postfix users
Cc : Robert Schetterer; mouss
Objet : Re: has yahoo mailservers problems ?
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:20:36 +0100
Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss schrieb:
Robert Schetterer
Terry Carmen schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
thx mouss for your qualified info, but this appeared just this morning,
and i hadnt include
their error because they have plenty of servers which give different
error codes ( which make no sense at all )
at all they give no usefull information
Mark Goodge schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Gerard schrieb:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:09:16 +0100
Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
double checked this on different mailservers
on different nets , at current i cant deliver out mail to yahoo.de/com
anyone else notices same
tôba schrieb:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:20:36 +0100
Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss schrieb:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Gerard schrieb:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:09:16 +0100
Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
double checked this on different mailservers
on different
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Marco Tchi Hong schrieb:
Hello,
I've got the same problem too since this morning...
I even tried to send mail to Yahoo with a test server with an IP address I
never used for a mail server, and I also get the 451 error message...
Marco
-Message d'origine
mailboxes or use them total by their owner
postfixadmin gives you good configure choices for such stuff
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
?
youre right tiscali domains are offline ,company was sold to freenet
nobody knows why they dont delete their mx s
i advice to create error transports for those domains
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
adresses
as real world this will lead to many bounces by ignorant mailusers
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
601 - 700 of 722 matches
Mail list logo