; Did you try apt-get?
milter-regex is not in the Ubuntu repositories (at least for 20.04).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
onfiguration_manual/authentication/user_databases_userdb/
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 21.02.2022 o godz. 13:09:19 Alexey Shpakovsky pisze:
> On Mon, February 21, 2022 12:59, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >
> > The part I am wondering about is exactly "Dovecot accepts". As far as I
> > know, Dovecot does not need to "accept" anyth
tion@address->mailbox. Is that your case?
But this still doesn't have anything to do with Dovecot "accepting" any
email addresses, because Dovecot just provides access to a mailbox. Once you
properly log in, you have access to all messages stored in the mailbox,
regardless of what e
mpletely unneccessary in your case. What
funtion exactly does it provide here?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
pretty rare case for me (I usually work with single-server setups). I did
not think that it can be used in such context as rewriting by canonical
maps.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpup
es where this post exists. But
maybe his security team will be happy with removing it from that particular
place where they found it...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 9.02.2022 o godz. 13:58:01 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze:
>
> I think it's just a routing misconfiguration at some major ISP. It might be
> hepful that the OP does a traceroute to www.postfix.org and tells where it
> stops.
I did a traceroute to the first five sites that fail according
rg and tells where it
stops.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ee availability test results here:
> https://ping-admin.com/free_test/result/16443944516w2j65r1y4j0kca10wdw3q.html
> (not sure if this link will be valid for long, though).
Poland, ISP is UPC ( https://www.upc.pl/ ), works OK.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a m
P address, for example by using
permit_mynetworks ?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
mtpd_" :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
is
run to provide this service. Both services, on port 25 and 587, are provided
by two instances of the same executable, therefore "smtp" in both cases.
After "smtpd" there can be arguments used to call this executable - these
arguments are used to make both services operate differently.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
;overkill" for using one simple utility? Why
couldn't it just use the system-installed Python?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
t have one in the configuration shown in your mail)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Postfix authors that
they have done it right. To implement TLS support, one certainly has to know
more about it than an average mail administrator. So just trust them.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 12:51:54 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
> > On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
> >>
> >>What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
> >
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
>
> What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
> (non-spam) would generate soft fail?
Forwarding.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they
your metadata.
And you are right with regard to the fact that metadata is often more
important in "spying" on the individual than the actual data transmitted;
but simple solutions like HTTPS don't protect you from metadata being
collected.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
&qu
pient of the mail can access its content. No operator of any
mail server is able to read your message. If you use only level 2, then
operators of both sending and receiving server (and any intermediate server,
if there are any) can have access to the message in plaintext form.
--
Regards,
somehow commerce-related
and collect personal data.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
it is not - and *should not* be - mandatory.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
all text/plain parts from multipart
messages, up to 5 levels nesting of multipart messages one inside another
(that level is configurable via a parameter in the script).
If you want to look at it, it's here: http://rafa.eu.org/media/textconv.pl
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
-
Dnia 14.12.2021 o godz. 13:06:49 Andrew Sullivan pisze:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >That's exactly what Public Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
>
> Well, to be a little more pointed about it, it attempts to provide a
> volu
and policy, and maybe be
able to demonstrate a bunch of actual independent subdomains registered
under this domain, run by someone else than you? Because that's the way
eu.org, uk.com and similar operate.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years,
not use any generic SLDs under country's
TLD (at least not mandatory ones), but just allow to register names directly
under country's TLD, like somename.de, somename.hu, somename.nl etc.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
lic Suffix List is for. It lists all such domains.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
at PSL is for -
to specify which domains should *not* be mixed up with one another.
Don't defend Google's email service, it's already so bad that it's not worth
defending...
Friends should not let friends use Gmail - that's all that can be said about
it.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
yes, Google IS dumb enough to do so.
> If so, given they allow spammers virtually free range to send FROM
> gmail this is a bit hypocritical.
100% agree.
They simply don't care about anyone that isn't using Gmail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, wh
fix) usually use.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
V/yJDH9grmHtmgAAdabr2Q Saved)
Dec 6 19:11:59 softlinksys postfix/qmgr[38286]: 04E4CA06C5: removed
It's only strange why your qmgr is logging empty "from", and lmtp empty
"to". But this message should be somewhere on your system; look for it.
--
Reg
you
should try to configure an email client like Thunderbird and check email
sending/receiving with it.
Not everything at once!
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with h
known
reject_unknown_helo_hostname is known to produce quite a lot of false
positives, and it is not recommended to use this restriction.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
check for authenticated users (ie. submission ports).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
k.com). The *client* address in your case is
mx0f-00376703.gpphosted.com, so it is *not* from domain dhs.gov. So it was
not whitelisted.
As far as I know, there's no option to whitelist *sender* addresses in
postgrey.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, w
ne) and there's no reason to
replace them (or sometimes there isn't even anything to replace them with).
The concept of trusted hosts/networks has a reason behind it and cannot be
abandoned so simply...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school,
ix should outright reject the
message without trying to deliver it.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
e in mutt, it puts the
e-mail address of the original sender (not you) at the beginning of the
subject of the forwarded message.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived
nclude some.domain
literally in your regular expression, then it won't match again on the
already transformed address, which does not contain some.domain.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpup
; (via the milter application that I've configured), it still does not
> apply any header checks to them.
If you are able to apply a milter to them, you can write a milter that
rewrites those headers.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
doesn't let
> you see anyone else's content. Wierdly unhelpful.
I vaguely remember that this topic has been discussed several times on
mai...@mailop.org mailing list. I highly recommend this mailing list for
dealing with deliverability issues.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
&
At least they will know :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
, with the time stamp as the only link between both.
Well, maybe I'm using quite old versions of Postfix and Dovecot, but with
default logging setup on Debian plus "auth_verbose=yes" in Dovecot config I
get in /var/log/mail.log lines like:
Jul 30 23:15:17 rafa postfix/smtpd[23291]: warnin
w have a formal business
justification to be not compliant with the mentioned security guidelines -
because they will be unable to communicate with their customers if they
comply.
That's just how the corporate bureaucracy works...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million y
Dnia 14.06.2021 o godz. 09:51:30 Linda Pagillo pisze:
>
> Any other ideas of what may be causing this?
Is it possible that the client is trying STARTTLS (and not TLS-wrapped SMTP)
on port 465?
Have you tried a different mail client instead of Outlook?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Raf
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
strictions
> # -o smtpd_sender_restrictions=$mua_sender_restrictions
>
> but no proposed values for those.
These lines are commented out. Did you uncomment them in master.cf? If you
didn't, then you are probably keeping global values from main.cf for these
parameters without overriding them.
--
Reg
service.
And if Postfix weren't there, then Dovecot submission service will relay
mail via...?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
to be available:
"The Dovecot SMTP submission service directly proxies the mail transaction
to the SMTP relay configured with the following settings:"
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ngle message with multiple
recipients?
Tell him to use some software that will send one message per recipient and
per session. This will take time, but it should be basically one-time job
and will allow him to catch the bounces and remove the bouncing addresses
from his list.
--
Regards,
Dnia 18.05.2021 o godz. 13:47:15 post...@ptld.com pisze:
> >On 05-18-2021 12:36 pm, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >If Postfix on server X is only for submission, then how does Postfix on
> >server Y deliver mail to server X?
>
> It doesn't because as you said, server X is only f
al mail if not deliver it locally? Where else can it
be delivered if there is only one server?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ween server X and server Y so
that only server Y can access the services on server X (iptables).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
tory) TLS whenever possible, only if the server does not offer it, but
offers TLS-wrapped port 465, fall back to that instead.
But all this discussion has nothing to the original question, as the OP
explictly wanted to test sending mail via port 25.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@ra
ail.
Thunderbird, as far as I remember (I haven't used it for a few years, I
use Evolution as my desktop client now) can be configured to use locally
installed sendmail, but this is a special case. Submission or SMTP is still
the default method of sending mail it uses.
--
Regards,
Jar
rpose
> SMTP transaction tester utility program for generating test emails
> using SMTP transactions. For example:
Ubuntu desktop should have Thunderbird preinstalled. Why not just try to
send mail using a regular mail client?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a mill
have full control over, you usually send
mail directly and not via relayhost. In both cases there's no issue.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
here: http://www.postfix.org/tcp_table.5.html
Seems like this can be a solution for you. You have of course to write the
appropriate program that replies with the correct server address depending
on recipient's email adress.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million
t folder) it works well. You can think of
creating something similar if you only want to deliver to a particular
folder. For something more general, however, using sieve (or even procmail,
as mentioned) would be definitely a better solution.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa
ought that sendmail logs the HELO
>
> unknown (HELO-or-EHLOname [ipaddress])
Maybe you're right, I don't remember too well, as I stopped using sendmail
quite long time ago. However, I'm sure it also logged non-matching DNS in
somehow similar way...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.o
sendmail logged something like
unknown (reverse.dns.hostname) [ip.ad.dr.ess]
and when they match, it logged just
reverse.dns.hostname [ip.ad.dr.ess]
I guess the OP would be satisfied if Postfix did something similar?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, wh
his Postfix server) without the need to
add authentication to it...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
pposite: if you will only be sending mail via VPN (that
means from a fixed IP address), then don't bother using submission port,
just add that IP to "mynetworks" and send the mail to your server the
normal way via port 25... Less to set up...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
egards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 23.04.2021 o godz. 08:27:31 Phil Stracchino pisze:
> On 4/23/21 5:15 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > However, "thanks" to Google and other
> > big e-mail providers who started to enforce that EVERY email send to them
> > must pass SPF/DMARC check - as a method
local mails come from existing accounts in your own domain, right?
What other source could they come from?
So you will be not sending bounces out to the Internet. They will stay at
your local machine.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to scho
h a thing in non_smtpd_milters=.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
to them
must pass SPF/DMARC check - as a method of "antispam protection" (which it
isn't, because spammer can have a perfectly valid SPF/DMARC setup) - people
were forced to adopt it universally, whether necessary or not (which for
example causes problems with mailing lists).
--
Regards,
(all newest
releases) connect perfectly to http-only sites. Maybe you have HTTPS only
mode turned on in the preferences (AFAIK, it is not on by default), or have
some extension like "HTTPS Everywhere" installed?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when
't mean split views.
I meant to create different "type forward" zones in /etc/named.conf with
different set of forwarders for different domain suffixes.
But I don't know what to do if you have everything under the same domain
suffix.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"
t all, or "hosts: files" when only /etc/hosts is used and DNS is not
used at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
tings in Debian. Here is conection from
Postfix list server for your message:
Apr 18 12:45:31 rafa postfix/smtpd[1653]: Anonymous TLS connection
established from camomile.cloud9.net[168.100.1.3]: TLSv1.2 with cipher
AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
-
relaying at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
or an alias.
We can just use port number in the Postfix master.cf file, then there will
be no problem, right?
(I am actually running another smtps instance on a nonstandard port on my
server, and use just port number in master.cf, so I guess the same applies
for standard ports)
--
Regards,
J
artext SMTP session (like on port
587) in case of "TLS". In recent versions they changed these settings to
"TLS over dedicated port" and "STARTTLS after connection".
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ll, just strange, doing everything differently.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
write your own content filtering rules
(you can use eg. spamassassin, procmail, sieve etc. to do the actual
filtering - there are many tools available) that target these particular
messages.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they
iendly company/ISP or company/isp who doesn't care).
L2 and L3 lists are exactly the problem. They recently changed rules for
these and now list almost everyone there ;)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: onc
Dnia 1.04.2021 o godz. 19:38:30 DEPRÉ Gaëtan - NGServers.com pisze:
>
> I enabled port 465, but no chance. Still the same problem, only with
> android/outlook...
Looks like you have to sniff network traffic to see what's actually going
on...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@ra
garding UCEPROTECT
practices and basically everybody agreed that it isn't a reliable blacklist
and they can't be trusted.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
eiving
server (MX for "example.com" domain) to forward the mail via UUCP to the
machine it knows as "joe" and deliver it to user "b" on that machine :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
counts in both domains.
If you don't want this, you have to use recipient access restrictions like
in the example I sent previously.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 21.03.2021 o godz. 18:43:40 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> > If you want "maennerchor-kirchseeon.de" to be a local domain instead, you
> > need to make "the-grue.de" a virtual domain,
>
&g
Dnia 21.03.2021 o godz. 18:48:12 Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 05:14:39PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> >
> > /^examplelist.*@list\.maennerchor-kirchseeon\.de$/DUNNO
> > /@list\.maennerchor-kirchseeon\.de$/550 5.1.1 User unknown in lo
dresses are accepted only
in that domain and not any other. So you basically have a separate domain
for the mailing list only.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
nerchor-kirchseeon.de"
from there) and also appropriate mappings for "the-grue.de" domain in
/etc/postfix/vmailbox. Be aware that any local accounts - if you have any -
will now become adddresses in the domain "maennerchor-kirchseeon.de" and not
"the-grue.de" as p
ntent filter to running it as a milter as well. At least that was in my
case :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Americans.
In my country there is a proverb, which literally translated means "being
more popish than the Pope himself". This is exactly what happened here.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was
to a non-existent user WILL get a rejection and must be prepared to handle
this.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
use actual mailing list software for
that?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ess there are still some things you didn't describe...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
some placeholder in your "master" cf file instead of
domain name, that gets replaced by a proper value during copying file to the
destination server. This would probably require adding some custom script to
the command that deploys files onto the target that modifies the file after
downloading
amavis, very popular,
that integrates clamav and spamassassin.
Myself I stopped using spamassassin as content filter when I needed to
implement DKIM signing milter in my server, because use of a content filter
caused outgoing mail to be signed twice - and switched to spamass-milter.
--
Regards,
ot - it is enough to set
it once. So I would try to set it in a script that deploys/copies Postfix
configuration to the target machine.
--
Pozdrowienia,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
l-smtp-in.l.google.com has address 64.233.162.27
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com has address 64.233.162.26
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com has IPv6 address 2a00:1450:4010:c05::1a
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com has IPv6 address 2a00:1450:4010:c05::1b
raj@jarek-02:~$
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.
or
perfectly correctly DKIM signed messages. I don't know why it is so, but I
see it in SA results all the time.
As I totally do not care about DKIM and it is by no way a spam mark to me, I
had no motivation to investigate it any further. Maybe someone knows more...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Ra
d instead of
just returning NXDOMAIN?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
l.spamcop.net. 300 IN A 91.195.240.87
But isn't this a commonly accepted conventions for RBLs that they return
addresses from 127.0.0.0/8 only in case of positive response?
Shouldn't Postfix (or any other MTA) ignore the RBL response if it's not
from 127.0.0.0/8 range?
--
Regard
from a single drop box on an ISP and SMTP-forwarding
it based on header addresses. (We don't really recommend this, though, as it
may lose important envelope-header information. ETRN or a UUCP connection is
better.)"
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years
201 - 300 of 459 matches
Mail list logo