RE: Monitoring logs for blocks and deferrals

2021-05-24 Thread Justin Lloyd
servers. Error codes are helpful but not used in sufficiently standardized ways based on what I’ve seen in our logs. From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On Behalf Of IL Ka Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 3:05 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Monitoring logs for blocks and deferrals

Re: Monitoring logs for blocks and deferrals

2021-05-23 Thread Leandro Santiago
a month, but it would be nice to be immediately alerted if postfix logs messages about such deferrals or blocks. Does Postfix have any native capabilities good for detecting these issues and acting on them, or would I just need to do some kind of checks on the pflogsumm output each day? Obviously

Re: Monitoring logs for blocks and deferrals

2021-05-12 Thread IL Ka
> > > Postfix have any native capabilities good for detecting these issues and > acting on them, or would I just need to do some kind of checks on the > pflogsumm output each day? Obviously the sooner I can catch these messages > and act on them, the better, so the more realtime I can do this, the

Monitoring logs for blocks and deferrals

2021-05-12 Thread Justin Lloyd
e list. I do use pflogsumm to summarize the logs daily on both servers and I keep those for a month, but it would be nice to be immediately alerted if postfix logs messages about such deferrals or blocks. Does Postfix have any native capabilities good for detecting these issues and acting on them

-o syslog_name=XYZ only shows first deferrals with that syslog_name? Retries appear to defer without the custom syslog_name.

2013-02-11 Thread Donovan Bray
smtp_helo_name=mail-27.redacted.com We noticed that there were errors in the main mail.log file that referenced that lines IP address but with a name of 'postfix/error' instead of 'postfix-app1/error', and pflogsumm wasn't reporting those deferrals. If I grep the mail.log by that lines IP address

Re: -o syslog_name=XYZ only shows first deferrals with that syslog_name? Retries appear to defer without the custom syslog_name.

2013-02-11 Thread Wietse Venema
that referenced that lines IP address but with a name of 'postfix/error' instead of 'postfix-app1/error', and pflogsumm wasn't reporting those deferrals. You did not override the logging from the Postfix error(8) daemon. Wietse

Re: IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-23 Thread Pim Zandbergen
Pim Zandbergen: Wietse Venema wrote: I know of no RFC that says only whitelisted clients can send email over IPv6. Well, it's their policy. I can respect that, if their assumption that senders should fall back to IPv4 is valid. 2 - Increase smtp_mx_session_limit (default: 2) so that

IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Pim Zandbergen
I cannot send mail to ISP nines.nl nor to their customers. Nines.nl have three MX hosts: two at weight 100, with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses one at weight 500, IPv4 only Their primary MX hosts defer all mail sent to their IPv6 address with 451 Your IPv6 address is not whitelisted at

Re: IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Pim Zandbergen: I cannot send mail to ISP nines.nl nor to their customers. Nines.nl have three MX hosts: two at weight 100, with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses one at weight 500, IPv4 only Their primary MX hosts defer all mail sent to their IPv6 address with 451 Your IPv6 address is not

Re: IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Pim Zandbergen
Wietse Venema wrote: I know of no RFC that says only whitelisted clients can send email over IPv6. Well, it's their policy. I can respect that, if their assumption that senders should fall back to IPv4 is valid. 2 - Increase smtp_mx_session_limit (default: 2) so that Postfix will

Re: IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Pim Zandbergen: Wietse Venema wrote: I know of no RFC that says only whitelisted clients can send email over IPv6. Well, it's their policy. I can respect that, if their assumption that senders should fall back to IPv4 is valid. This policy is mistaken for the following reasons. First,

Re: IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Pim Zandbergen
Wietse Venema wrote: This policy is mistaken for the following reasons. Doesn't that make the whole ipv6whitelist.eu initiave mistaken? Or could there be a correct way to use it? As a side note: they do explain how to enable their whitelisting in Postfix:

Re: [OT] IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 8/17/2011 1:47 PM, Pim Zandbergen wrote: Wietse Venema wrote: This policy is mistaken for the following reasons. Doesn't that make the whole ipv6whitelist.eu initiave mistaken? Or could there be a correct way to use it? As a side note: they do explain how to enable their whitelisting in

Re: IPv6, backup MX and 4XX deferrals

2011-08-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Pim Zandbergen: Wietse Venema wrote: This policy is mistaken for the following reasons. Doesn't that make the whole ipv6whitelist.eu initiave mistaken? Or could there be a correct way to use it? This approach is incompatible with 100% RFC-compliant MTAs, and is therefore broken by design.

Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Dhiraj Chatpar
help!!! i am continually getting deferalls from yahoo, rediffmail which are 2 ISPs in our country. We are a big organization and we send a good number of emails in a day. But this deferral problem is a pain. I have implemented, feedbackloop, PTR, Domainkeys, DKIM, etc.. but still face the same

RE: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Gary Smith
Of Dhiraj Chatpar Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:41 AM To: Postfix users Subject: Deferrals help!!! i am continually getting deferalls from yahoo, rediffmail which are 2 ISPs in our country. We are a big organization and we send a good number of emails in a day. But this deferral problem

Re: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Dhiraj Chatpar
on these ISP's.. I am sure from my experience that the MTA has to be the only best way to throttle the emails so that i get good deliveries. IP reputation is clean. All looks good.. just this temp deferrals from these ISP and sometimes others based on the kind of emails that are send from my org email

Re: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Larry Stone
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: All looks good.. just this temp deferrals from these ISP and sometimes others based on the kind of emails that are send from my org email servers. Please advice a way to get thru this issue. And how long are they deferred for? My experience is Yahoo

Re: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Dhiraj Chatpar
: All looks good.. just this temp deferrals from these ISP and sometimes others based on the kind of emails that are send from my org email servers. Please advice a way to get thru this issue. And how long are they deferred for? My experience is Yahoo defers lots of mail. But, none

Re: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:11:18AM +0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: i am continually getting deferalls from yahoo, rediffmail which are 2 ISPs in our country. We are a big organization and we send a good number of emails in a day. But this deferral problem is a pain. I have implemented,

Re: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Dhiraj Chatpar
Dear Mr. Viktor, 1. Most of the emails get through on the first try, 2. The mails is on an average retried 2-3 times 3. 1/3 of the messages bounce 4. the feedback loop looks clean as the employees of my org only send to people they know.. thus if you are referring to spam like activity then that

Re: Deferrals

2009-11-13 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:48:34AM +0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: 1. Most of the emails get through on the first try, Quantify most. What fraction is that? Out of what overall volume (msgs/day)? 2. The mails is on an average retried 2-3 times What is the average time before deferred mail is