On Oct 19, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
$ make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
CCARGS='-arch x86_64 -DUSE_TLS -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \
-DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\dovecot\ \
-DDEF_COMMAND_DIR=\/usr/local/sbin\ \
-DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\/usr/local/etc/postfix\ \
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
You should no longer need to specify -lresolv (though it won't
fix this problem), and should never have needed to specify -arch x86_64?.
Hmmm, that '-arch x86_64' was in a note you (Viktor) posted on 5/11/14 in the
topic Client
On Oct 20, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
You should no longer need to specify -lresolv (though it won't
fix this problem), and should never have needed to specify -arch x86_64?.
Hmmm,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:12:00AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
You'll find that 2.11.2 also no longer compiles.
Nothing between 2.11.2 and 2.11.3 changed in this regard. Did you
upgrade your OS (to Yosemite)? Or upgrade your compiler? Your
/usr/include/stdlib.h no longer compiles with
On 20 Oct 2014, at 3:12 pm, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:00:01PM +1100, James Brown wrote:
* Portability fix for MacOS X 10.7.x (Darwin 11.x) build procedure.
Doesn't seem to work for me. :-(
Don't blame the messenger
I’m definitely
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:00:01PM +1100, James Brown wrote:
* Portability fix for MacOS X 10.7.x (Darwin 11.x) build procedure.
Doesn't seem to work for me. :-(
Don't blame the messenger, your compilation environment is broken.
$ make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
CCARGS='-arch x86_64
On 20 Oct 2014, at 11:04 am, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Portability fix for Postfix 2.11:
* Portability fix for MacOS X 10.7.x (Darwin 11.x) build procedure.
Doesn’t seem to work for me. :-(
$ cd postfix-2.11.3
$ make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
CCARGS='-arch x86_64
On 20 Oct 2014, at 3:22 pm, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:12:00AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
You'll find that 2.11.2 also no longer compiles.
Nothing between 2.11.2 and 2.11.3 changed in this regard. Did you
upgrade your OS (to