Recommendation for setting Amavisd-new spam destiny for post-queue

Hi, all. I was curious what best practices are nowadays for those who use post-queue filtering if they elect not to keep spam/virused/bad-attachment-laden messages, something which I found myself having to do owing to my previous message (there's no way to selectively disable pre-queueing

Re: Recommendation for setting Amavisd-new spam destiny for post-queue

Ian R. Justman wrote: Hi, all. I was curious what best practices are nowadays for those who use post-queue filtering if they elect not to keep spam/virused/bad-attachment-laden messages, something which I found myself having to do owing to my previous message (there's no way to selectively

Re: Recommendation for setting Amavisd-new spam destiny for post-queue

Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Practice: Actual implementation will depend on your size and business model. Here (private network with ~1000 users), we tag+pass spam up to some SA score, higher scoring spam is discarded. Viruses are always discarded. Discarded mail is