On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 09:13:19PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > Postfix does not yet support Apple's BURL SMTP extension. With
> > Apple as the only MUA that supports BURL, it probably does not make
> > sense for Postfix to support BURL.
>
> Last time I asked (late 2013) Ap
Viktor Dukhovni:
> Postfix does not yet support Apple's BURL SMTP extension. With
> Apple as the only MUA that supports BURL, it probably does not make
> sense for Postfix to support BURL.
Last time I asked (late 2013) Apple currently does not support BURL.
Wietse
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:44:10AM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> > The way I had assumed it earlier was the client authenticates via
> > 993 (dovecot IMAP in our case), crafts an email to another user
> > and this email is delivered instantly via lmtp (in our case, dovecot
> > LDA), but now I s
Am 31.03.2014 02:35, schrieb Shawn Zaidermann:
> The way I had assumed it earlier was the client authenticates via 993
> (dovecot IMAP in our case), crafts an email
> to another user and this email is delivered instantly via lmtp (in our case,
> dovecot LDA), but now I see that in
> reality, th
I understand. Is there any other configuration
> > >>> I would need to do on the server side?
> > >>
> > >> for the case above - no, mail from one gmail user to another
> > >> gamil user is not rou
bove - no, mail from one gmail user to another
> >> gamil user is not routed trough hotmail and that behavior is
> >> logical and as expected
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below
Am 31.03.2014 02:07, schrieb cybermass:
> 587 is dedicated for submission but is it any different if I have
> configured smtps to be port 8809 and just have the clients use that port
> with STARTTLS instead of 587?
technically you can use whatever port but why not
use standars and make users life
--
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Unclear-of-smtp-protocol-in-a-restricted-domain-tp66494p66502.html
> To unsubscribe from Unc
accounts on more than one server
> (e.g., gmail and hotmail and your server) then they may very well
> try to submit mail via their hotmail account, even if they intend
> to send mail to someone on your mail server.
>
> Wietse
>
>
> ----------
&
Am 31.03.2014 01:54, schrieb cybermass:
> Interesting, that is something I never even thought of
why should a server hosting example.com relay a to him
submitted message from a...@example.com to b...@example.com
trough a foreign server?
what should that foreign server do with that message
other
your mail server.
>
> Wietse
>
>
> ----------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Unclear-of-smtp-protocol-in-a-restricted-domain-tp66494p66500.html
>
cybermass:
> Ok the user's emails should not go through any other servers out on the
> internet to reach mine. Meaning their emails are sent directly within the
> server. so if j...@restricted.com sends to j...@restricted.com, nobody else
> should be able to read that email, no ISP, or any system.
about SMTP or Postfix,
> talk about what practical properties you want for the email in question
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
>
> ------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://postfix.10
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 04:13:00PM -0700, cybermass wrote:
> How can I configure it so that the user's email never bounce through any
> other hop but go directly through the server?
By arranging for mail to the domain in question to be delivered locally:
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGUR
ion need not be the final store
> for the mailboxes of that domain, and may deliver the mail to the
> final mail-store via LMTP (remote non-SMTP hop) or via SMTP.
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your mes
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 03:35:13PM -0700, cybermass wrote:
> If there is a postfix server that is configured to only accept and send
> email to users in the same domain, say for example
> j...@restricted.com can only send to another_u...@restricted.com, does this
> mean that the client's email nev
Am 31.03.2014 00:35, schrieb cybermass:
> Hi. I am a bit unclear about how email works in a closed domain from roaming
> clients (SASL auth clients).
>
> If there is a postfix server that is configured to only accept and send
> email to users in the same domain, say for example
> j...@restricted.
postfix server?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Unclear-of-smtp-protocol-in-a-restricted-domain-tp66494.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
18 matches
Mail list logo
