James Zee skrev den 2013-05-31 06:43:
reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
On 5/30/2013 11:43 PM, James Zee wrote:
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my
smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the
SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly
appreciative if someone could sanity check my work.
Reviewing
Stan,
On 05/31/2013 08:49 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/30/2013 11:43 PM, James Zee wrote:
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my
smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the
SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly
appreciative if
On 5/31/2013 4:09 AM, Mikael Bak wrote:
Stan,
On 05/31/2013 08:49 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/30/2013 11:43 PM, James Zee wrote:
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my
smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the
SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few
On 2013-05-31 6:04 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
It is a waste of everyone's time including the poster and readers to
go spell check main.cf files on the mailing list. Wietse Venema
12/09/2010
Stan, I certainly don't read that as saying people cannot ask for a
sanity check
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:43:51AM -0400, James Zee wrote:
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my
smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the
SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly
appreciative if someone could sanity check my
Stan Hoeppner:
What I stated above is Wietse's policy:
It is a waste of everyone's time including the poster and readers
to go spell check main.cf files on the mailing list.
To place the quote in context:
Stan:
This is exactly why I wanted to see your main.cf. It's a total
mess. I'll
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:09 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:43:51AM -0400, James Zee wrote:
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my
smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the
SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:15:05AM -0400, James Zee wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:09 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:43:51AM -0400, James Zee wrote:
snip
Also, you really should separate submission from your inbound
port 25. I only allow relaying on the
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my
smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the
SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly
appreciative if someone could sanity check my work.
The goal is, obviously, to (a) block spammers, (b) only
On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:43:51 -0400
James Zee jamesze...@gmail.com wrote:
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
check_policy_service unix:private/policy-spf
reject_unauth_destination
check_policy_service must be after
11 matches
Mail list logo