On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm thinking we can accept sending some backscatter to our own
customers, at least as long as it's authenticated backscatter and we can
Hi,
I want to send 1 Lacs emails per hour.
Please suggest me the steps to achieve this.
--
Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact me on
the numbers provided below.
Thanks Regards,
Avinash Pawar
Software Engineer.
Viva Infomedia Pvt. Ltd.
242, Oshiwara
Hi,
I have a mail receiving postfix deployed.
On this I am trying to block emails that are to sent to
'donotre...@mydomain.com'
For this I am doing the following:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/blockList,
reject_unauth_destination,
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:11:02 Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Sep 7 04:53:55 ip-10-194-99-63 postfix/smtpd[942]: fatal: open database
/etc/postfix/blockList.db: No such file or directory Sep 7 04:53:56
ip-10-194-99-63 postfix/master[938]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 942
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
Here is an example:
telnet mailserver 25
Trying XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX...
Connected to mailserver.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mailserver ESMTP
helo mail
250
Seann nombran...@tsukinokage.net wrote in message
news:4c819dd3.8060...@tsukinokage.net...
That is what I was figuring. Trying two different locations with the CA
file I was using broke, when according to the list's information and my
own reading it should work, turned out to require me to
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:50:30PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
I want to send 1 Lacs emails per hour.
Most readers of this (international) list do not know that 1 lac
is 100,000. This usage is largely confined to India.
Please suggest me the steps to achieve this.
This is
* Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:50:30PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
I want to send 1 Lacs emails per hour.
Most readers of this (international) list do not know that 1 lac
is 100,000. This usage is largely confined to India.
Ah! I'm
Hi,
I have a mail receiving postfix deployed.
On this I am trying to block emails that are to sent to
'donotre...@mydomain.com'
For this I am doing the following:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/blockList,
reject_unauth_destination,
Hi,
How many mails can I sent using basic configuration of postfix?
Also please give me some idea about postfix performance tuning.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:50:30PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:27:17PM +, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have a mail receiving postfix deployed.
On this I am trying to block emails that are to sent to
'donotre...@mydomain.com'
For this I am doing the following:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Hi,
*
Now currently the mails are getting rejected with SMTP error code 554, and
the mailbox of the sender gets a notification from it's local mail server
about the failure.
Is there any way I can quietly 'drop' the emails for the above mentioned
case.
Then you shouldn't block them.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:50:17PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
How many mails can I sent using basic configuration of postfix?
This question has no answer, except to say that on typical commodity
server hardware you are unlikely to send more than ~3,000 msgs/sec per
Postfix instance. A
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:53:13PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
I am running postfix 2.3.3 as part of Centos 5.5.
I am trying to set up a hybrid mail system which involves postfix, dovecot
and Google Apps.
Ideally - I would like the email clients to use a authenticated TLS
connection to
On 9/7/2010 5:16 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
...
Any hint is well accepted.
This is a basic function of the SMTP protocol.
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm thinking we can accept sending some backscatter to our own
customers, at least as
Noel Jones ha scritto:
On 9/7/2010 5:16 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
..
Any hint is well accepted.
This is a basic function of the SMTP protocol.
Ok,
On 9/7/2010 10:23 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Noel Jones ha scritto:
On 9/7/2010 5:16 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
..
Any hint is well accepted.
This is a
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:40:23AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Ok, this is right, but is also an information leak... with rcpt to i can
enumerate the local users of the system, and for me this is not too
good... No way to fix this?
This is part of the design of SMTP. You can call it a feature
On 2010-09-07 17:23, Claudio Prono wrote:
Ok, this is right, but is also an information leak... with rcpt to i can
enumerate the local users of the system, and for me this is not too
good... No way to fix this?
If it is not necessary for those local users to receive mail, you could
alter
Zitat von Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:50:17PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
How many mails can I sent using basic configuration of postfix?
This question has no answer, except to say that on typical commodity
server hardware you are
* Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
Ok, this is right, but is also an information leak... with rcpt to i can
enumerate the local users of the system, and for me this is not too
good... No way to fix this?
Turn off SMTP :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Le 07/09/2010 16:17, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm thinking we can accept sending some
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:13:23PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
This question has no answer, except to say that on typical commodity
server hardware you are unlikely to send more than ~3,000 msgs/sec per
Postfix instance. A queue-manager performance test I ran 2 years ago
showed that at
On 09/07/2010 12:16 PM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
Here is an example:
telnet mailserver 25
Trying XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX...
Connected to mailserver.
Escape character is
Hello all:
I have /var/mail mounted separately and plenty of space. But when / get short
on space I saw things like this:
Sep 7 18:37:24 tochox postfix/smtpd[25798]: connect from (somewhere)
Sep 7 18:37:24 tochox postfix/smtpd[25798]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL from
(somewhere): 452 4.3.1
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 07/09/2010 16:17, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm
Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
Hello all:
I have /var/mail mounted separately and plenty of space. But when / get short
on space I saw things like this:
Sep 7 18:37:24 tochox postfix/smtpd[25798]: connect from (somewhere)
Sep 7 18:37:24 tochox postfix/smtpd[25798]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL
On 09/07/2010 08:07 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:13:23PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
This question has no answer, except to say that on typical commodity
server hardware you are unlikely to send more than ~3,000 msgs/sec per
Postfix instance. A queue-manager
On Martes 07 Septiembre 2010 19:21:02 Joe escribió:
Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
Hello all:
I have /var/mail mounted separately and plenty of space. But when / get
short on space I saw things like this:
Sep 7 18:37:24 tochox postfix/smtpd[25798]: connect from (somewhere)
Sep 7
On 06.09.10 19:07, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postconf(5) says cleanup_service_NAME - I suspect it will work once
he changes that :)
You're right, I did not spot this. ;-) When I use cleanup_service_name
instead of cleanup_service, it works. This is a feasible solution, as
long as the submission
Zitat von Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:13:23PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
This question has no answer, except to say that on typical commodity
server hardware you are unlikely to send more than ~3,000 msgs/sec per
Postfix instance. A
On 06.09.10 23:13, mouss wrote:
you need to review your master.cf and main.cf for typos and
space/comment errors.
As Jeroen Geilman pointed out, it is cleanup_service_name instead of
cleanup_service.
I recommend using
-o var=${main_cf_var}
where variables are defined in main.cf. This
Quoting Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
Hello all,
I use Postfix with mysql database for the users lookup. I have recently
found an information leak with the RCPT TO command.
Here is an example:
telnet mailserver 25
Trying XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX...
Connected to mailserver.
Escape
Hello all,
I am looking for a way to relay from one internal postfix box to another
internal postfix box using TLS. Basically, I have several servers with
applications that need to relay HIDS events and system logs etc. to the
central postfix email server for normal distribution from there.
On 9/7/2010 3:17 PM, james.rai...@heartland-ins.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am looking for a way to relay from one internal postfix box
to another internal postfix box using TLS. Basically, I have
several servers with applications that need to relay HIDS
events and system logs etc. to the central
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:07:54PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Single-core CPU limit. The system had 4 CPUs and the load peaked at ~25%.
The queue manager is single-threaded, and must do a fair amount of message
envelope processing. So the current design tops out at ~2-3k msgs/sec,
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:07:54PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Single-core CPU limit. The system had 4 CPUs and the load peaked at ~25%.
The queue manager is single-threaded, and must do a fair amount of message
envelope processing. So the current design tops out at
On 9/7/2010 4:36 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
problem is not easy to solve.
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten
Thanks for your incredibly useful advice Victor... May I ask some
follow up questions?..
On 7/09/2010 10:06 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:53:13PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
I am running postfix 2.3.3 as part of Centos 5.5.
I am trying to set up a hybrid mail
Am I missing something obvious?
With many ISPs providing generic PTR, reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
is too gentle.
I'd really like to implement reject_unknown_client_hostname, but I've seen
too many cases where address-name mapping = exists, the name-address
mapping = exists, BUT
41 matches
Mail list logo
