Hi all!
I have a server with postfix with virtual users (using MySQL), it's
working ok, let's call it A. I also have a secondary server, which I
want to use to send mails even outside my local network, let's call it
B. So I'm trying to configure B to relay through A to send e-mails. The
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
We have a situation where a certain email address get the following
error. All other mail gets relayed.
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:mariu...@vegaspartnerlounge.dk:
host maila.vegaspartnerlounge.dk [196.14.16.67]:
554 5.7.1
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:19:18 +0200
Marius Lewies articulated:
I am new to Postfix and have taken over the admin thereof.
We have a situation where a certain email address get the following
error. All other mail gets relayed.
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
Hello list,
I'm new to this list hoping to receive some help. I posted my question on June
20 on the Zarafa community page, but did not get a feedback since, so I hope
you tolerate my double posting. This is what I'm struggeling with:
I'm quit proud to say that I have sucessfully managed to
Please keep this on-list. You're neither family, nor personal friend,
nor paying customer, so you're not entitled to personal support.
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
Did you postmap all_ad_recipients after adding the recipient address?
= Yes did run a ./getadusers and verified that address
Nor did I think I am. This is the first time that I am using this
forum. Instead of replying to all I mistakenly replied to yourself.
If you are not prepared to assist or help and Yes I know you ALL do it
on your own time and free will I will gladly remove myself from the
list.
-Original
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Marius Lewies
Sent: 23 July 2012 14:32
To: Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
Nor did I think I am. This is the first time that I am
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 3:45 PM
To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
Am 23.07.2012 16:03, schrieb Marius Lewies:
please strip qutoings a little bit!
Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
date. Ansgar suggested You need to run the command to convert the
(plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses How to do or
-Original Message-
From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
Sent: 23 July 2012 15:03
To: James Day; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23,
On 7/23/2012 7:24 AM, jan...@web.de wrote:
Hello list,
I'm new to this list hoping to receive some help. I posted my question on
June 20 on the Zarafa community page, but did not get a feedback since, so I
hope you tolerate my double posting. This is what I'm struggeling with:
I'm quit
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 4:15 PM
To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
-Original Message-
From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
Sent: 23 July
would you please strip your quotes a little bit
and at least remove multiple header-blocks
this starts to become complete unreadable
thank you!
Am 23.07.2012 16:39, schrieb Marius Lewies:
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
date. Ansgar suggested You need to run the command to convert the
(plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses How to do
or else, where can I find the instruction to do this.
Hi there,
I'd like to know if is possible to check some itens using postfix policy
delegation:
- file extensions (I could use mime_header_checks to check it globally, but I
need to accept for some groups and reject to another groups of users)
- text in subject (I could use header_checks to
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:28:33PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
I'd like to know if is possible to check some itens using postfix
policy delegation:
- file extensions
No. Message content is not available to policy services.
- text in subject
No. Message content is not available to
Alfredo Saldanha:
Hi there,
I'd like to know if is possible to check some itens using postfix policy
delegation:
Message content is not available via this interface. Consider using
the interfaces for deep content inspection: SMTP-based or Milter.
Wietse
Ok,
I'm asking this, because I need do this checks according the user/group, I can
not check globally.
I'll read more about Milters.
Thank you.
- Mensagem original -
De: Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 23 de
Hello,
Sorry for the broad question, but is there any sort of best common practice
these days regarding limiting outbound email? We recently had a customer's
account compromised (not sure if it was brute-forced or keylogged) and then the
perp proceeded to use their credentials to smtp-auth
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
man 5 transport says that trivial-rewrite(8) doesn't allow
substitutions in pcre tables, otherwise, this is
Marty Beckler:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
/etc/postfix/transport:
example.com smtp-no-mx:
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Marty Beckler:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Marty Beckler wrote:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
man 5 transport says that
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Marty Beckler:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Marty Beckler wrote:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
On 7/23/2012 7:22 PM, Ori Bani wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
What's wrong with MX lookups? If the records are absent, Postfix
will use A records,
Interesting, for me, postfix was throwing up its hands instead.
That's not normal
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
but not limit legitimate use.
See:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
You would apply this to your submission service, eg:
587 inet n
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
but not limit legitimate use.
See:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
You would apply
28 matches
Mail list logo
