[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-25 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Hi Jaroslaw, In this context, it's not about the ability to recognize the message, as unique IDs and postfix long queue IDs can handle that effectively within the 200-character limit. The primary concern is having the capability to log full header values. As Gerald illustrated with the example

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-25 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users: > Hi Jaroslaw, > > In this context, it's not about the ability to recognize the > message, as unique IDs and postfix long queue IDs can handle that > effectively within the 200-character limit. The primary concern > is having the capability to log full header

[pfx] [postfix] 3.4.23: virtual, pipe and ${original_recipient} vs. ${recipient}

2024-01-25 Thread hawky--- via Postfix-users
Hi, we're in the process to integrate SpamAssassin in our mail system. We decided to use the after-queue attempt with smtpd -o content_filter= The problem we're facing right now is that pipe is getting the alias name as recipient instead of the username - both are the same:

[pfx] Re: [postfix] 3.4.23: virtual, pipe and ${original_recipient} vs. ${recipient}

2024-01-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:04:38PM +, hawky--- via Postfix-users wrote: > we're in the process to integrate SpamAssassin in our mail system. We > decided to use the after-queue attempt with > > > smtpd -o content_filter= > The problem we're facing right now is that pipe is getting the alias

[pfx] Re: [postfix] 3.4.23: virtual, pipe and ${original_recipient} vs. ${recipient}

2024-01-25 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-01-25 at 11:58:56 UTC-0500 (Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:58:56 -0500) Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: - Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multiple recipients after "-u". It doesn't.

[pfx] Re: Different rules for submission(s)

2024-01-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:31:44PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users wrote: > Hello, > > Since over 20 years I use Postfix, but some things I don't understand... > > I want different rules for mail what comes through submission(s) and what > comes from other mailservers using port 25.

[pfx] Re: Different rules for submission(s)

2024-01-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 09:13:22PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users wrote: > Op 25-01-2024 om 20:40 schreef Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:31:44PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis via > > Postfix-users wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Since over 20 years I

[pfx] Different rules for submission(s)

2024-01-25 Thread Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users
Hello, Since over 20 years I use Postfix, but some things I don't understand... I want different rules for mail what comes through submission(s) and what comes from other mailservers using port 25. What is the correct way to do that? E.g. I don't want a check on blacklists on the submission

[pfx] Re: Different rules for submission(s)

2024-01-25 Thread Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users
Hello Viktor, Thanks for your quick answer! See my inline response: Op 25-01-2024 om 20:40 schreef Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:31:44PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users wrote: Hello, Since over 20 years I use Postfix, but some things I don't

[pfx] Re: [postfix] 3.4.23: virtual, pipe and ${original_recipient} vs. ${recipient}

2024-01-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:48:39PM -0500, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: > > - Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the > > spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multiple > > recipients after "-u". > > It doesn't. The argument to '-u' is a key to

[pfx] Re: Documentation on upgrade 2.10 to 3.5

2024-01-25 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 25/01/24 04:38, Bill Gee via Postfix-users wrote: Oops!  I just realized that I sent this instead of saving it.  Dang! I've re-organized the quoted section to put your questions in their intended order. The time is finally coming when I have to do something with my Postfix server.  I

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-25 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 24.01.2024 o godz. 23:21:10 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: > > As the amount of email increases it can be difficult to distinguish mails > to or from a correspondent. In this case it would help a lot to display > the subject as well but that's not part of envelope data. Therefore