Jos Chrispijn put forth on 9/19/2010 11:11 AM:
I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
different mail folders.
As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care of
that.
Hi,
I want to know how we can increase the maximum number of concurrent
connections.
So please tell me at what extent I can increase value and where it is
stored?
--
Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact me on
the numbers provided below.
Thanks Regards,
Zitat von Avinash Pawar // Viva avin...@vivainfomedia.com:
Hi,
I want to know how we can increase the maximum number of concurrent
connections.
So please tell me at what extent I can increase value and where it is
stored?
Have a look for default_process_limit
Hi All,
Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
Received a mail today from a user that sent a e-mail which immediately
bounced..
The bounce message said:
host bla.bla.bla[xxx.xxx.xxx] said: 550-SPF check SOFT fail. Your are not
allowed to send mail from 550
On Monday 20 September 2010 14:18:16 Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote:
Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
Definitely not Postfix related.
As far as I understand from the whole SPF perspective, shouldn't a Soft
Fail be a 4** error and re-try,
On 09/20/2010 09:29 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 14:18:16 Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote:
Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
Definitely not Postfix related.
As far as I understand from the whole SPF perspective, shouldn't
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 18:11 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
different mail folders.
As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
of messages that aren't sorted, as my
On 20-9-2010 9:11, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I was in a similar situation not long ago using TBird rules to do my
message sorting into IMAP folders. When accessing my mail vi my
Roundcube webmail server nothing was sorted. I grew tired of this. I
was already using Dovecot for my IMAP server, so I
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
before it acknowledges successful receipt of an email?
--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/
Yang Zhang:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
This is required by internet mail RFC and therefore not configurable.
Wietse
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
before it acknowledges successful receipt of an email?
On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
No, but it does guarantee durability from the receiving SMTP session to
the delivering process.
This CAN be
Ok, let me do this another way, since I'm clearly not understanding
how this is suppose to work. I read:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#virtual
Am I understanding this correctly? If I put
addr...@virtual_domain m...@gmail.com
Shouldn't it simply forward email from the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
No, but it does guarantee durability from
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC section you're referring to? Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Yang Zhang:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
This is required by internet mail RFC and therefore not configurable.
Yang Zhang:
Just to be clear, if I have this Maildir in my mailbox postmap:
j...@mydomain.com joe/
and most other settings are the Ubuntu 10.04 postfix defaults, then
postfix will have done an fsync by the time the 250 OK: queued as
12345 comes back, such that if I then immediately
Yang Zhang:
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC section you're referring to? Thanks.
I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
RFC 821
RFC 2821
RFC 5321
These have lots of other good stuff about Internet mail.
Wietse
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Wietse Venema
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
a lot of 'relaying denied', 'noqueue reject', 'too many errors
On 9/20/2010 4:29 PM, bper wrote:
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
a lot of 'relaying
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Yang Zhang:
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC section you're referring to? Thanks.
I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
RFC 821
RFC 2821
RFC 5321
These have lots of other good stuff about
bper put forth on 9/20/2010 3:29 PM:
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
a lot of 'relaying
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Yang Zhang:
Just to be clear, if I have this Maildir in my mailbox postmap:
j...@mydomain.com joe/
and most other settings are the Ubuntu 10.04 postfix defaults, then
postfix will have done an fsync by the time
On 9/20/2010 3:29 PM, bper wrote:
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
a lot of 'relaying denied',
* Yang Zhang yanghates...@gmail.com:
No. Postfix replies 250 OK: queued as 12345 when the message is QUEUED.
Doesn't this contradict your original reply that durability is
guaranteed? If there's no fsync, then the message may not have been
persisted to non-volatile storage, and will be
Yang Zhang put forth on 9/20/2010 3:46 PM:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Yang Zhang:
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC section you're referring to? Thanks.
I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
RFC 821
RFC 2821
RFC 5321
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Yang Zhang yanghates...@gmail.com:
No. Postfix replies 250 OK: queued as 12345 when the message is QUEUED.
Doesn't this contradict your original reply that durability is
guaranteed? If there's no fsync, then the message may not have been
persisted to non-volatile
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round robin dns for mail.customer.domain so that it
points to multiple IPs like this:
mail.customer.domain. 900 IN A
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round robin dns for mail.customer.domain so
that it points to multiple IPs like
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:10:49AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round robin dns
On 09/21/2010 12:52 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:10:49AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:56:14AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Yes, when traffic to the destination is light (message deliveries
are spaced multiple seconds or more apart) or is very heavy (message
deliveries are many in each interval equal to the delivery of a single
message). When traffic
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/20/2010 6:01 PM:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:56:14AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Yes, when traffic to the destination is light (message deliveries
are spaced multiple seconds or more apart) or is very heavy (message
deliveries are many in each interval equal to
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round
Le 20/09/2010 22:46, Yang Zhang a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venemawie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Yang Zhang:
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC section you're referring to? Thanks.
I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
RFC 821
RFC 2821
RFC 5321
Le 20/09/2010 21:15, Yang Zhang a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:15:37PM -0400, Brian Pribis wrote:
If I put
addr...@virtual_domain m...@gmail.com
Shouldn't it simply forward email from the first address to my gmail account?
Yes.
What happens is the mail does go to gmail but if I hit reply it
tries to mail back to
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:56:35 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 9/20/2010 3:29 PM, bper wrote:
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working
36 matches
Mail list logo
