Re: HA mail system

2011-01-14 Thread Simone Caruso
On 13/01/2011 22:06, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: On 13/01/11 19:00, Jaques Cochet wrote: After some reading: - GFS and maildir work bad together - NFS and maildir are not that good, NFS and postfix have some issues but should be OK. Where did you read that GFS worked badly with maildir? I'd be

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
On 13/01/11 16:00, Wietse Venema wrote: There have been a few late changes to clean up the postscreen user interface. I left in some backwards compatibility support for early adopters. The backwards compatibility will be removed by the time of the Postfix 2.8 stable release. Wietse I get

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
John Fawcett: Jan 14 10:53:12 rosalia postfix/postscreen[1328]: warning: To stop this warning, SPECIFY EMPTY VALUES FOR POSTSCREEN_WHITELIST_NETWORKS AND POSTSCREEN_BLACKLIST_NETWORKS Please follow the instructions!! Wietse

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
On 14/01/11 13:02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * John Fawcett john...@erba.tv: I get the following warnings with postfix-2.8-20110112 even though I don't use any more postscreen_whitelist_networks and postscreen_blacklist_networks in my configuration having replaced them by the new

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* John Fawcett john...@erba.tv: The code itself seems only to check if the values are set so if you have removed them completely (rather than setting to blank) you should see the warning because the default value of postscreen_whitelist_networks is not blank (unless $mynetworks is blank).

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Tomoyuki Murakami
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:59:38 +0100, John Fawcett john...@erba.tv wrote: I get the following warnings with postfix-2.8-20110112 even though I don't use any more postscreen_whitelist_networks and postscreen_blacklist_networks in my configuration having replaced them by the new

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
On 14/01/11 13:33, Wietse Venema wrote: John Fawcett: Jan 14 10:53:12 rosalia postfix/postscreen[1328]: warning: To stop this warning, SPECIFY EMPTY VALUES FOR POSTSCREEN_WHITELIST_NETWORKS AND POSTSCREEN_BLACKLIST_NETWORKS Please follow the instructions!! Wietse thanks

postscreen_access_list action code

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
Up to now I have been using the same access file for: check_client_access in smtpd_mumble_restrictions and postscreen_whitelist_networks. since the client ips I had whitelisted for smtpd would also be whitelisted for postscreen (in particular this whitelisting is used to avoid DNSBL checks on

Re: postscreen_access_list action code

2011-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
John Fawcett: Up to now I have been using the same access file for: check_client_access in smtpd_mumble_restrictions and postscreen_whitelist_networks. since the client ips I had whitelisted for smtpd would also be whitelisted for postscreen (in particular this whitelisting is used to

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:53:01PM +0100, John Fawcett wrote: On 14/01/11 13:33, Wietse Venema wrote: John Fawcett: Jan 14 10:53:12 rosalia postfix/postscreen[1328]: warning: To stop this warning, SPECIFY EMPTY VALUES FOR POSTSCREEN_WHITELIST_NETWORKS AND

Re: postscreen_access_list action code

2011-01-14 Thread John Fawcett
On 14/01/11 14:50, Wietse Venema wrote: John Fawcett: Up to now I have been using the same access file for: check_client_access in smtpd_mumble_restrictions and postscreen_whitelist_networks. since the client ips I had whitelisted for smtpd would also be whitelisted for postscreen (in

Re: Forward all local delivered mail to specific address

2011-01-14 Thread Markus Treinen
Am 14.01.2011 00:02, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: You alias VIRTUAL addresses to REAL users, not the other way around. The real user already has a real mailbox - why does he need to go through at least 2 extra translation steps ? Because I don't want to have a REAL (as in UNIX) user for every

Per user exceptions to mailbox_size_limit

2011-01-14 Thread Eugene Vilensky
Hello, What would one recommend as the simplest solution to implementing a per-user exception to mailbox_size_limit or alternative? Should one be using quotas on my /var/spool/mail ? Thanks! -Ev

Re: Per user exceptions to mailbox_size_limit

2011-01-14 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:28:16AM -0600, Eugene Vilensky wrote: What would one recommend as the simplest solution to implementing a per-user exception to mailbox_size_limit or alternative? Should one be using quotas on my /var/spool/mail ? Use a real IMAP server backend, not

Re: rbldnsd for sender emailids instead of domains

2011-01-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/13/2011 7:26 AM, Ramprasad wrote: Currently on my MX servers I use a custom rhsbl to reject domains blacklisted by us. The DNS lookups are handled using a local rbldnsd server. I am trying to create a list of spammer email ids so that I can reject spammers of neutral domains. But this

Re: Network Ideas

2011-01-14 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:05 AM: What does everyone think of a DRBD + GFS2 idea? I wrote up a detailed response to the same question on the Dovecot list yesterday, in fact, in response to you. Why are you running the same thread on both mailing lists? -- Stan

Re: Network Ideas

2011-01-14 Thread Jonathan Tripathy
On 14/01/11 18:13, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:05 AM: What does everyone think of a DRBD + GFS2 idea? I wrote up a detailed response to the same question on the Dovecot list yesterday, in fact, in response to you. You did indeed, thanks Why are you

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM: postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris systems (Solaris support was completed last week). AIX? -- Stan

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:00:43PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM: postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris systems (Solaris support was completed last week). AIX? The above systems reflect the 3 supported flavours

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM: postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris systems (Solaris support was completed last week). AIX? AIX and HP-UX are not tested. Both use a BSD-derived TCP/UP stack, and will probably work. I may get

Re: Forward all local delivered mail to specific address

2011-01-14 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 1/14/11 3:41 PM, Markus Treinen wrote: Am 14.01.2011 00:02, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: You alias VIRTUAL addresses to REAL users, not the other way around. The real user already has a real mailbox - why does he need to go through at least 2 extra translation steps ? Because I don't want to

Re: HA mail system

2011-01-14 Thread mouss
Le 13/01/2011 22:06, Jonathan Tripathy a écrit : On 13/01/11 19:00, Jaques Cochet wrote: After some reading: - GFS and maildir work bad together - NFS and maildir are not that good, NFS and postfix have some issues but should be OK. Where did you read that GFS worked badly with maildir?

Re: Forward all local delivered mail to specific address

2011-01-14 Thread mouss
Le 14/01/2011 15:41, Markus Treinen a écrit : Am 14.01.2011 00:02, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: You alias VIRTUAL addresses to REAL users, not the other way around. The real user already has a real mailbox - why does he need to go through at least 2 extra translation steps ? Because I don't want

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org: Stan Hoeppner: Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM: postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris systems (Solaris support was completed last week). AIX? AIX and HP-UX are not tested. Both use a BSD-derived

Re: Postfix 2.8 stable release soon

2011-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org: Stan Hoeppner: Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM: postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris systems (Solaris support was completed last week). AIX? AIX and HP-UX are not

Re: Autoresponse problem (Sorry for a bit OT - but somehow Postfix related)

2011-01-14 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-01-04 11:05 AM, mouss wrote: - postfixadmin has a vacation.pl script. but I don't know its status now. The latest version (2.3.2) is very good... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: Network Ideas

2011-01-14 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/14/2011 12:22 PM: On 14/01/11 18:13, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:05 AM: What does everyone think of a DRBD + GFS2 idea? I wrote up a detailed response to the same question on the Dovecot list yesterday, in fact, in