Re: Postfix STARTTLS bug on SLES11 SP1 still unfixed ? (solved !)

2011-04-26 Thread Alexander Grüner
Hi, just for info, it has been fixed on saturday. postconf | grep mail_ver mail_version = 2.5.6 rpm -qa | grep postfix postfix-2.5.6-5.6.1 Nessus scan is fine. Best regards, Alexander

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxx]: 554

2011-04-26 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* motty.cruz motty.c...@gmail.com: Hello, One of our clients is trying to send us email and this is what I see in the Logs: # grep -i u...@tld.com /var/log/maillog | more Apr 25 06:49:01 host postfix/smtpd[27269]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: 554 5.7.1

Gateway Spam Recipient Restrictions?

2011-04-26 Thread Fire walls
Had been reading a postfix manuals and info from Internet. I'm running spam server with FreeBSD 8.2 + Postfix 2.8.x, single domain. Internet --spam server-- mail server --Internal Network. The gateway is working, but I still doing changes to block most of the spam that touch my server,

Postfix 2.7.0 and yaa 0.3

2011-04-26 Thread Peter L. Hansen
Hi List, Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice functionality to our setup. It seems that the best option is to use yaa. Other suggestions are welcome. I have a postfix setup with virtual users in mysql, and found followed the guide on

Re: Postfix 2.7.0 and yaa 0.3

2011-04-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
26.04.2011 13:28, Peter L. Hansen wrote: Hi List, Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice functionality to our setup. It seems that the best option is to use yaa. Other suggestions are welcome. I have a postfix setup with virtual users in mysql, and

Re: Postfix 2.7.0 and yaa 0.3

2011-04-26 Thread Peter L. Hansen
Hi Michael, Thanks for the pointer. Much better now. I got i working now .. somewhat. It seems it will use my u...@fake.tld as the lookup key and as the sender of the reply. According to the documentation http://cml.dokuro.org/howto/yaa.txt It should be alias_user@your_domain.tld instead

Re: Make local tempfail when LDAP is down

2011-04-26 Thread jeffrey j donovan
On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:22 PM, William Ono wrote: Hello all, Yes, this again. I promise it's slightly different this time. I have users in LDAP and they're brought in as local users by libnss-ldapd. With local_recipient_maps set to use a LDAP map instead of unix:passwd.byname, smtpd

Re: Make local tempfail when LDAP is down

2011-04-26 Thread Wietse Venema
William Ono: Hello all, Yes, this again. I promise it's slightly different this time. I have users in LDAP and they're brought in as local users by libnss-ldapd. With local_recipient_maps set to use a LDAP map instead of unix:passwd.byname, smtpd correctly tempfails incoming mail when the

Re: all header_checks works with postmap -q, but not all work when processing actual mail

2011-04-26 Thread b...@bitrate.net
On 2011.04.25 14.41, mouss wrote: you are not testing the same data. you test a pcre file, but your postfix uses two regexp files. sigh. that was it, thank you. same problem as my last question, all over again. i switched to pcre, but neglected to update main.cf to reflect that.

Re: Gateway Spam Recipient Restrictions?

2011-04-26 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/26/2011 3:00 AM, Fire walls wrote: Had been reading a postfix manuals and info from Internet. I'm running spam server with FreeBSD 8.2 + Postfix 2.8.x, single domain. Internet --spam server-- mail server --Internal Network. The gateway is working, but I still doing changes

Not Using reverse DNS

2011-04-26 Thread Dan Lists
I am seeing the following in my logs: Apr 26 10:18:43 mailhost postfix/smtpd[46627]: connect from unknown[98.118.152.26] However, the IP does resolve: mailhost # host 98.118.152.26 26.152.118.98.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer onlinecourseevaluations.com. mailhost # host

Re: Make local tempfail when LDAP is down

2011-04-26 Thread William Ono
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:44:05AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: That is because the POSTFIX LDAP client queries the LDAP server. The POSTFIX LDAP client works correctly: when the LDAP server fails to respond, the POSTFIX LDAP client returns a temporary error. However, for mail that

Re: Not Using reverse DNS

2011-04-26 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:49:03AM -0500, Dan Lists wrote: I am seeing the following in my logs: Apr 26 10:18:43 mailhost postfix/smtpd[46627]: connect from unknown[98.118.152.26] However, the IP does resolve: mailhost # host 98.118.152.26 26.152.118.98.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer

Re: Gateway Spam Recipient Restrictions?

2011-04-26 Thread Fire walls
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/26/2011 3:00 AM, Fire walls wrote: Had been reading a postfix manuals and info from Internet. I'm running spam server with FreeBSD 8.2 + Postfix 2.8.x, single domain. Internet --spam server-- mail server

Stop sending, yet allow queuing of messages

2011-04-26 Thread Jeff Bernier
Hello, I have looked for, but cannot find help on doing the following: I would like to temporarily stop Postfix from sending queued messages, but allow it to continue queuing additional new messages, also to be temporarily held. My goal is to be able to watch the mail queue fill up with

Re: Stop sending, yet allow queuing of messages

2011-04-26 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:24:06PM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote: I have looked for, but cannot find help on doing the following: I would like to temporarily stop Postfix from sending queued messages, but allow it to continue queuing additional new messages, also to be temporarily held. My

Postfix w/TLS, virtual domain, non-unix account

2011-04-26 Thread Mike
I've got postfix working with TLS in a virtual domain configuration. The postfix server is accepting mail with no problems; per log: Apr 26 06:05:23 sato postfix/smtpd[26962]: connect from mail-iy0-f180.google.com[209.85.210.180] Apr 26 06:05:23 sato postfix/smtpd[26962]: setting up TLS

Re: Postfix w/TLS, virtual domain, non-unix account

2011-04-26 Thread Mike
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: This is all that would be logged with smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1, and it is quite sufficient. Excellent, will do and thanks for letting me know I'm now ready to configure an imap server. Mike

Re: Make local tempfail when LDAP is down

2011-04-26 Thread Wietse Venema
William Ono: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:44:05AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: That is because the POSTFIX LDAP client queries the LDAP server. The POSTFIX LDAP client works correctly: when the LDAP server fails to respond, the POSTFIX LDAP client returns a temporary error. However, for

Re: Postfix 2.7.0 and yaa 0.3

2011-04-26 Thread fakessh
Le mardi 26 avril 2011 11:28, Peter L. Hansen a écrit : Hi List, Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice functionality to our setup. me i use sieve Can i configure postfix to send the proper headers? Thanks, Peter Hansen --

Re: Gateway Spam Recipient Restrictions?

2011-04-26 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/26/2011 11:51 AM, Fire walls wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/26/2011 3:00 AM, Fire walls wrote: Had been reading a postfix manuals and info from Internet. I'm running

Re: Gateway Spam Recipient Restrictions?

2011-04-26 Thread Fire walls
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/26/2011 11:51 AM, Fire walls wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 4/26/2011 3:00 AM, Fire walls wrote: Had been

Re: ldap transport lookups: any holes in my solution?

2011-04-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:59:13PM -0400, John Baker wrote: On 04/25/2011 10:59 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:59:27PM -0400, John Baker wrote: There are several ways to make this work right including virtual aliases but the cleanest way seemed to me to be a per user

Re: ldap transport lookups: any holes in my solution?

2011-04-26 Thread Wietse Venema
John Baker: On 04/25/2011 10:59 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:59:27PM -0400, John Baker wrote: There are several ways to make this work right including virtual aliases but the cleanest way seemed to me to be a per user transport map lookups for cloud users. I

PATCH: Make local tempfail when LDAP is down

2011-04-26 Thread Wietse Venema
attached file: 20110426-local-maps-find-patch. Wietse 20110426 Bugfix: the local(8) delivery agent ignored table lookup errors in mailbox_command_maps, mailbox_transport_maps, fallback_transport_maps and (while bouncing mail to alias) alias owner lookup

Re: PATCH: Make local tempfail when LDAP is down

2011-04-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:19:13PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: diff -cr -C4 src/local/bounce_workaround.c src/local/bounce_workaround.c *** src/local/bounce_workaround.c Sat Feb 13 21:00:24 2010 --- src/local/bounce_workaround.c Tue Apr 26 16:44:22 2011 *** *** 96,126