You MUST use a backend for sasl
Auth
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 9 juin 2011 à 07:56, Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Hi,
found anything.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Suresh Kumar Prajapati
er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just want to
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
No one is there to help me
You started your thread ignoring the list policy which tells how to ask for
help.
When I asked you to follow the rules you replied to me offlist.
I looked at your configuration and replied to the list.
You
Hi,
Sorry for this.
I am sending you the saslfinger output
Usage: saslfinger [-chs]
Use saslfinger -h to find out what the options mean.
[root@quranmail postfix]# saslfinger -s
saslfinger - postfix Cyrus sasl configuration Thu Jun 9 11:24:25 MSD 2011
version: 1.0.2
mode: server-side SMTP
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Suresh Kumar Prajapati
er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
and i dont find any saslauthd.conf file
here is the /etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
mech_list: plain login
That's a problem. In that file (/etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf) you are
Hi,
I;ve gone through this and setup the things according to the config there.
please let me know if I'm wrong anywhere.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Ingram sbing...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Suresh Kumar Prajapati
er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com wrote:
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
[root@quranmail postfix]# saslfinger -s
saslfinger - postfix Cyrus sasl configuration Thu Jun 9 11:24:25 MSD 2011
version: 1.0.2
mode: server-side SMTP AUTH
-- basics --
Postfix: 2.3.3
System: CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
-- smtpd
Hi,
Here is the interactive session output
[root@quranmail postfix]# telnet 217.23.4.146 25
Trying 217.23.4.146...
Connected to 217.23.4.146.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 domain.com ESMTP
ehlo google.com
250-domain.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 10485760
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
On 8 juin 2011, at 18:15, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
After the period of double delivery is over, we will deliver emails only to
Google servers. So the virtual aliases map is to look like:
public-addr...@univ-lyon2.fr
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
Here is the interactive session output
[root@quranmail postfix]# telnet 217.23.4.146 25
Trying 217.23.4.146...
Connected to 217.23.4.146.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 domain.com ESMTP
ehlo google.com
250-domain.com
250-PIPELINING
Hi
following is the output from the command you have
[root@domain.com ~]# testsaslauthd -s pam -u tom -p redhat
0: NO authentication failed
and then i change /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd
fiel MECH=shadow
and then run the following command
[root@domain.com ~]# testsaslauthd -s shadow -u tom -p redhat
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
Hi
following is the output from the command you have
[root@domain.com ~]# testsaslauthd -s pam -u tom -p redhat
0: NO authentication failed
and then i change /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd
fiel MECH=shadow
and then run the following command
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
Both are system users and I've assigned password to them using
passwd user_name
command as well
saslpasswd2 user_name
So we have two ways to go: system accounts or separate mail user database.
I recommend using the separate database,
Hi,
For the time being I just want to go with system accounts,once this is set ,
I can catch up with second option.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter
p...@state-of-mind.dewrote:
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
Both are system users and I've
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
For the time being I just want to go with system accounts,once this is set ,
I can catch up with second option.
Fine.
Run saslauthd with -a shadow.
Run testsaslauthd and verify you have a user for whom authenication works.
Drop
Hi,
Followed your steps and this is output
warning: SASL authentication failure: Password verification failed
Jun 9 13:12:26 domain.com postfix/smtpd[1391]: warning:
fdsakjfhbdskj.fdsakjfhbdskj.com[ip_address]: SASL plain authentication
failed: authentication failure
testsaslauthd -s pam -u
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/8/2011 7:35 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
Oh, thanks. The maintainer must have renamed it.
Yes, I renamed it quite a long time ago (in internet time) when it was
suggested running it through the pcre engine was more optimal. If
memory serves me correctly, I made the
Hi,
Can anyone help me...
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Suresh Kumar Prajapati
er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Followed your steps and this is output
warning: SASL authentication failure: Password verification failed
Jun 9 13:12:26 domain.com postfix/smtpd[1391]: warning:
* Suresh Kumar Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
Followed your steps and this is output
warning: SASL authentication failure: Password verification failed
Jun 9 13:12:26 domain.com postfix/smtpd[1391]: warning:
fdsakjfhbdskj.fdsakjfhbdskj.com[ip_address]: SASL plain authentication
Hello
I'm trying to achieve sender dependent authentication.
Please find corresponding configuration files in attachment.
Although the sender dependent authentication is configured,for some
reason postfix don't follow those rules,but is checking virtual table
instead and rejects the incoming
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:00:56 +0200
Dragan Zubac zubacdra...@gmail.com articulated:
Hello
I'm trying to achieve sender dependent authentication.
Please find corresponding configuration files in attachment.
Although the sender dependent authentication is configured,for some
reason postfix
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:12:17AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
On 8 juin 2011, at 18:15, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
After the period of double delivery is over, we will deliver emails only
to Google servers. So the
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:19:30AM -, ross.sysadm wrote:
I have problems with expansion_limit.
Postfix + Dovecot + AD + multiple email domains.
What Postfix feature is the table below supposed to support?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
server_host = srv-ad.cn.energy
Is there something that shows the expense associated with each check.
I have looked through the documentation on the postfix site but could
not find anything.
John A
--
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
(Edmund Burke)
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:59:53PM -0400, John wrote:
Is there something that shows the expense associated with each check.
I have looked through the documentation on the postfix site but could not
find anything.
Just common sense. Expense is mostly a question of latency and not over-using
Hello
Sorry,I'll try to report a problem again following your instructions.
Summary
I'm trying to achieve the following :
- email arrives
- postfix checks the sender address
- postfix looks up username/password and relay host for that sender address
- postfix SMTP client connects to the
On 6/9/2011 4:09 PM, Dragan Zubac wrote:
Hello
Sorry,I'll try to report a problem again following your instructions.
Summary
I'm trying to achieve the following :
- email arrives
- postfix checks the sender address
- postfix looks up username/password and relay host for that sender
Hello
Yes,I have two instances of postfix.
One is in /etc/postfix and another one is in /etc/postfix2 and both
works fine.
The problem is with sender dependent authentication that is configured
on the second instance and which seems inactive,meaning when second
instance of postfix receives an
Hi,
I don't really know where to post feature ideas, but this seems the only viable
option.
I was setting up a fallback MX server with Postfix and was struggling with
preventing backscatter mail. I thought I found a good solution, but it turned
out to be an illegal option.
Postfix has the
On 2011-06-09 Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
I was setting up a fallback MX server with Postfix and was struggling
with preventing backscatter mail. I thought I found a good solution,
but it turned out to be an illegal option.
Postfix has the ability to do recipient address verification. When
Hello
Just to make clear here,so postfix feature to 'route' emails based on
the sender address is valid only for outgoing emails not for incoming ones ?
Sincerely
On 06/09/11 23:33, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/9/2011 4:22 PM, Dragan Zubac wrote:
Hello
Yes,I have two instances of postfix.
One is
Of course. It's a two-step process (well, really more, but
we'll call it two here).
1. - mail is received. There are lots of controls for
receiving mail based on recipient, originating network, or
authentication. None of the decisions to accept mail are
based on the sender (you can decide
Well, when the primar is down, all incoming messages on the fallback are
deferred, because it can't do the verification. This means the result is the
same as having no fallback at all.
Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2011-06-09 Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
I was setting up a
On 2011-06-10 Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2011-06-09 Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
I was setting up a fallback MX server with Postfix and was struggling
with preventing backscatter mail. I thought I found a good solution,
but it turned out to be an illegal
Hello
Thank you,this clarify things a little bit.
Sincerely
On 06/10/11 00:25, Noel Jones wrote:
Of course. It's a two-step process (well, really more, but we'll call
it two here).
1. - mail is received. There are lots of controls for receiving mail
based on recipient, originating
Hi All,
i want only specific list of sender and specific list of recipient email
need to archive how to achive with it
where always_bcc will rediect all email . please any one can help me with
syntax or exmaple .
Regards,
Kshitij
35 matches
Mail list logo
