On Saturday 05 November 2011 22:40:03 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of David Southwell
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:41 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc: /dev/rob0
Zitat von David Southwell ad...@vizion2000.net:
On Saturday 05 November 2011 06:42:12 Simon Brereton wrote:
On 5 November 2011 08:21, David Southwell ad...@vizion2000.net wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2011 05:13:22 Wietse Venema wrote:
David Southwell:
Did you read the original posting
Am 06.11.2011 10:22, schrieb David Southwell:
Hence thoughtful engineers incorporate diagnostic parsers and html
configuration tools. IMHO postfix has been very slow to develop an apporocah
which places the needs of system administrators in the forefront of its
development strategy.
what
Am 06.11.2011 10:22, schrieb David Southwell:
IMHO Postfix needs to add to its goals a determination to make configuration
a
breeze rather than a challenge. That means diagnostic and corrective parsers
and or an html based configuration interface.
so and now i will tell you that i have
On Sunday 06 November 2011 01:46:35 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von David Southwell ad...@vizion2000.net:
On Saturday 05 November 2011 06:42:12 Simon Brereton wrote:
On 5 November 2011 08:21, David Southwell ad...@vizion2000.net wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2011 05:13:22 Wietse
On Sunday 06 November 2011 02:29:30 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 10:22, schrieb David Southwell:
IMHO Postfix needs to add to its goals a determination to make
configuration a breeze rather than a challenge. That means diagnostic
and corrective parsers and or an html based
Am 06.11.2011 10:34, schrieb David Southwell:
That is plain B**t. I am making a constructive contribution which, if
some
thought and consideration were given to it, might substantially improve
Postfix and make it much more administrator friendly.
THIS is plain bullshit
you are
Am 06.11.2011 10:39, schrieb David Southwell:
Agreed. It is possible to comprehend postfix's documentation given plenty of
time to concemntrate upon it. Unfortunately most administrators cannot give
that degree of attention to every piece of software.
than they are doing the wrong job!
On Sunday 06 November 2011 02:43:31 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 10:34, schrieb David Southwell:
That is plain B**t. I am making a constructive contribution which, if
some thought and consideration were given to it, might substantially
improve Postfix and make it much more
would you please be so gently only reply to the list and not
additionally to the post you are answering? your arguments
are not smart enough that there is a need get them all twice
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sunday 06 November 2011 02:54:42 Reindl Harald wrote:
would you please be so gently only reply to the list and not
additionally to the post you are answering? your arguments
are not smart enough that there is a need get them all twice
Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to
Am 06.11.2011 11:24, schrieb David Southwell:
Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to ask in a way that does
not demonstrate a determination, fequently expressed on this list, to hammer
into the ground anyone who has the audacity to voice an opinion which does
not
accord
On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:33:02 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 11:24, schrieb David Southwell:
Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to ask in a way that
does not demonstrate a determination, fequently expressed on this list,
to hammer into the ground anyone who has
Am 06.11.2011 11:40, schrieb David Southwell:
On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:33:02 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 11:24, schrieb David Southwell:
Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to ask in a way that
does not demonstrate a determination, fequently expressed on this
On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:55:45 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 11:40, schrieb David Southwell:
On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:33:02 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 11:24, schrieb David Southwell:
Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to ask in a way
that does not
On 6 November 2011 04:22, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2011 22:40:03 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of David Southwell
Sent: Saturday,
I'm closing this thread. Everyone has made their point. Time to
move on. People who continue this thread will be removed.
Meanwhile, I'm spending a day to add an option to the postconf(1)
command to display the contents of master.cf in canonicalized form,
similar to the way that postconf(1)
Thanks for the tips! I've specified the ip addresses which are allowed to send.
A couple weeks ago, I built an entire geocoder database in PostGIS 1.5.3 using
the impressive Tiger Geocoder 2010 build scripts
(http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/trunk/extras/tiger_geocoder/tiger_2010/). It took
a couple days, but in the end it worked.
Then I set about moving my work to another
On Nov 6, 2011, at 10:39 AM, René Fournier wrote:
A couple weeks ago, I built an entire geocoder database in PostGIS 1.5.3
using the impressive Tiger Geocoder 2010 build scripts
(http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/trunk/extras/tiger_geocoder/tiger_2010/). It
took a couple days, but in the end
Hi all,
First a little background.
Postfix version 2.6.6 on both host and guest.
Host OS RHEL server 6.0
Guest OS RHEL server 6.0
Virtual Machine QEMU-KVM
Host has 2 virtual interfaces virbr0 and virbr1 Postfix (guest and host) is
listening on all interfaces.
IPTables IS NOT RUNNING on
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:13:59 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Does anyone has ever use Plesk or another graphical interface
to manage Postfix ?
postfixadmin just works, so i keep my problem :-)
We're equally happy with Postconf (postconf.com).
Pat
Blair, Rick:
[root@guestServer init.d]# telnet fileserver 25
Trying 192.168.1.31...
Connected to fileserver.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 fileserver.test.org ESMTP Postfix
HELO guestServer
250 fileserver.guest.org
You can make ONE SINGLE connection.
I get the following when trying to
Julien Vehent:
Also for this last query, it looks like 65% of the IPs cannot be linked
to a country (XX = unknown). I'm not very familiar with the way geo-ip
databases gather their data, is that normal numbers for zombies ?
This is not my experience.
A few times a year I do a one-time
Please forgive the top posting, this is difficult with a blackberry.
The log snippit shows..:
fileserver.test.org192.168.1.31]:25
You you have a transport file or relayhost setting? It might have a problem
with a typo
I can see a closing square bracket, but not an opening square bracket.
On 06.11.2011 17:54, Wietse Venema wrote:
Julien Vehent:
Also for this last query, it looks like 65% of the IPs cannot be
linked
to a country (XX = unknown). I'm not very familiar with the way
geo-ip
databases gather their data, is that normal numbers for zombies ?
This is not my
26 matches
Mail list logo
