On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
You could consolidate all of your restrictions into
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting,
it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of
restrictions.
I recommend this as well. For me it's much easier to work
On 05/01/12 12:44, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:28:03AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 01/05/2012 12:19 AM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
These are very different functions.
Spam filtering is best achieved when mail
On 1/5/2012 12:46 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
The RBL sites come from various Postfix tutorials on the web, many of which
are getting woefully dated. Thanks for the updates.
First, please use the generic term dnsbl instead of RBL. RBL is a
copyrighted/trademarked term specific to MAPS
On 1/4/2012 5:44 PM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
Yes, dovecot, but I'm not currently using it as LDA. Instead, postfix
delivers the mail itself.
There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it:
1. Superior performance as messages are indexed during delivery.
Without LDA, all
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
On 1/4/2012 5:44 PM, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
Yes, dovecot, but I'm not currently using it as LDA. Instead, postfix
delivers the mail itself.
There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it:
1. Superior performance as messages
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Phill Macey phill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/01/2012 6:16 AM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
Connect: 11661
...
Reject total: 18525
Huh? You have more rejects than you had connects in the first place (every
rejected client must first connect
On 1/5/2012 8:04 AM, Michael Maymann wrote:
Hi List,
I have a mailrelay (internal-external), that I'm trying to harden
by allowing only certain external domains.
Is it possible to send bouncing mails to a specific
bou...@mydomain.com mailto:bou...@mydomain.com account, so I can
keep an
Dear list,
We want to setup a outbound postfix server in our datacenter dedicated
to our customers.
We want separate logs, separate spool directories, possibility to set
mail quota per customer,
Didicated IP addresses per customer.
Do you guys have experience with this kind of setup?
I was
Am 05.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Noah:
Sometimes when sending mail to my postfix server I receive the claim that
delivery temporarily suspended:
conversation with, 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial
server greeting . I am seeing this
message show up to the local
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings e...@lemings.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
set twice, the latter of which was overriding the
On 1/5/2012 10:18 AM, Noah wrote:
Sometimes when sending mail to my postfix server I receive the claim
that delivery temporarily suspended: conversation with,
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial server
greeting . I am seeing this message show up to the local user and
On 1/5/2012 10:24 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
Well I spoke too soon. The flood of spam started again this morning.
Obviously something isn't working. All testimonials I've read say that grey
listing stops 90% of spam but its not working.
Eric.
How effective any particular anti-spam
[ subject changed to be relevant to the thread ]
On Thursday 05 January 2012 10:24:11 Eric Lemings wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings e...@lemings.com
wrote:
This change seems to have been my missing link. Since I made
it, spam arriving in IMAP boxes has dropped drastically
On 2012-01-05 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it:
I think there is one... I rely heavily on the x-original-to header I use
a lot of aliases), and I think this is lost when using the dovecot LDA
isn't it?
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:54:05AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-05 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
There's no good reason not to use LDA, and many upsides to using it:
I think there is one... I rely heavily on the x-original-to header I
use a lot of aliases),
Hello List,
I upgraded postfix and accidentally restarted it with the standard
postfix configuration file instead of my configuration file.
After about 100 bounced messages I realized my mistake and replaced
the configuration file.
My setup has fetchmail collect the E-Mails from
Am 05.01.2012 18:33, schrieb Noel Jones:
And then I got
postfix/bounce[16947]: D3F729435A: sender non-delivery
notification: 01487F069D
...
Does the sender non-delivery notification mean that my
misconfigured postfix succesfully sent out a message?
The status= part that you
Hi Ralf,
one additional question.
I figured that our printers perhaps should be allowed to send mails to
anyone - hence I need to specifically relay mail for these to any domain.
This mean I have to configure the following rules in postfix:
1. All mail to our_own_domain are send to
On 06/01/12 03:49, Tobey Wheelock wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:03:44PM +1300, Peter wrote:
There are (at least) two options for you:
1. postfixadmin comes with a vacation program that works with virtual
users and can work by modifying SQL tables to change aliases for those
users. This
I'm curious if anyone has tested Postfix SMTP auth in conjunction with
Cyrus-SASL 2.1.25. My testing shows that when used linked to Cyrus-SASL
2.1.25, SMTP auth fails with an unknown mechanism error. Downgrading to
Cyrus-SASL 2.1.23 with the exact same configuration and build parameters
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I'm curious if anyone has tested Postfix SMTP auth in conjunction with
Cyrus-SASL 2.1.25. My testing shows that when used linked to Cyrus-SASL
2.1.25, SMTP auth fails with an unknown mechanism error. Downgrading to
Cyrus-SASL 2.1.23 with the exact same configuration
--On Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:39 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Hi Wieste,
A 2.1.25 linked Postfix always complains about no available mechanism:
I recall that OpenLDAP also links with Cyrus SASL. Perhaps Postfix
and OpenLDAP were built with different Cyrus SASL
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:39 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Hi Wieste,
A 2.1.25 linked Postfix always complains about no available mechanism:
I recall that OpenLDAP also links with Cyrus SASL. Perhaps Postfix
and OpenLDAP were built
Bob Proulx:
I have an account on a host machine that receives email from a mailing
list. That account then uses procmail to forward some messages to a
different account on a different host machine.
:0
! u...@example.com
All fine for the most part. But infrequently someone posts a
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:37:16 +0200, Tolga wrote:
Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client
host [85.95.233.13] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org;
Wietse Venema wrote:
Bob Proulx:
From: Some User user@invalid
This case is mailed but the From: line is changed to be the account
user owner of the forwarding process. The result shows up in the
What clobbers the From: header? Postfix does not, because otherwise
you would not have
26 matches
Mail list logo
