On 2012-03-02 Karol Babioch wrote:
I've got a server, which can be found at the domain example.com
(including a PTR record for reverse DNS lookups).
Now I want to run a mailserver for example.com, but I don't want to
create local users, but instead use virtual mailboxing.
Furthermore I've
Hello
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a mail server specific ?
Thank you
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:38:52 +0100
Frank Bonnet articulated:
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a mail server specific ?
There is, at least to my knowledge, no custom Postfix schema
available. If one was actually available, I might consider using LDAP
as opposed to MySQL.
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
Ich bin von 2012-02-27 bis einschließlich 2012-03-16 nicht im Büro.
Während dieser Zeit habe ich keinen Zugriff auf meinen Email Account und kann
Ihre Nachricht daher erst ab 2012-02-19 lesen.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an unsere Zentrale unter +43
On 03/02/2012 12:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:38:52 +0100
Frank Bonnet articulated:
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a mail server specific ?
There is, at least to my knowledge, no custom Postfix schema
available. If one was actually available, I might
Hi,
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a mail server specific ?
I have a custom LDAP schema for my whole mail system, including Postfix,
Dovecot and OpenDKIM. It is not perfect, but I can give it to you, if you want
it.
Best wishes
Christain
---
On 03/02/2012 01:12 PM, Christian Roessner wrote:
Hi,
Does a Postfix specific (Open)LDAP schema exists ?
or a mail server specific ?
I have a custom LDAP schema for my whole mail system, including Postfix,
Dovecot and OpenDKIM. It is not perfect, but I can give it to you, if you want
it.
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If so,
what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as posfix
while receiving thousands of emails a day?
Does anyone have any other suggestions for a DBMail like solution?
Thanks in advance!
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
There is ... no custom Postfix schema
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle where I can get
postfix.schema for LDAP?.
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
On 02.03.2012 16:25, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
There is ... no custom Postfix schema
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle where I can get
postfix.schema for LDAP?.
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
best
On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
99 cases out of 100 doesn't need different schemas. So you can
On 02.03.2012 16:47, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
99 cases out
* Nerijus Kislauskas nerijus.kislaus...@ktu.lt:
On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
99 cases
On 03/02/2012 02:57 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
So use any standard schema your LDA and mailbox access method
(pop/imap/whatever, ie, dovecot/courier-imap/whatever) uses.
You won't believe, but people are asking same questions on dovecot's
mailing list. And the answer is much the same:
There is
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:19:41AM -0500, Al wrote:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If
so, what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as
posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
Does anyone have any other suggestions for a DBMail like
On Friday, March 02, 2012 at 14:29:27 UTC, michael.demelba...@wsr.ac.at
confabulated:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:19:41AM -0500, Al wrote:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail. If
so, what is the performance, could it be ran on the same system as
posfix while
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the same system as posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
we are running dbmail since summer 2009 on all mailservers
with postfix and
Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the same system as posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
some thousands of mails are
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:08 AM, mail...@securitylabs.it
mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the
Am 02.03.2012 16:08, schrieb mail...@securitylabs.it:
Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the same system as posfix while receiving
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
[209.85.212.174])
by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSno Queue ID
Where is the Postfix queue ID?
my master.cf:
smtpd pass - - n
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
[209.85.212.174])
by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSno Queue ID
Where is the Postfix queue ID?
It's logged
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
[209.85.212.174])
by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS no
Il 02/03/2012 16:32, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
because i can write my own admin-backends and have a FULL SQL driven
mailsystem with replication slave what can be used for postfix
as fallback / load balancer
Just like me, web interface in php/mysql to manage domains and users,
the difference is
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
[209.85.212.174])
by
Am 02.03.2012 17:08, schrieb mail...@securitylabs.it:
how do you do your backups?
Bacula with Accurate backup
another software needed
i stop the slave per cron, make the backup with rsync
and start the slave again having a 100% consistent
copy
You need two server or at least two MySQL
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, mail...@securitylabs.it
mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
Il 02/03/2012 16:32, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
because i can write my own admin-backends and have a FULL SQL driven
mailsystem with replication slave what can be used for postfix
as fallback / load balancer
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
Hello Postfix Users :)
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100, Chris wrote:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
I am using Postfix with amavisd.
Received: from
Am 02.03.2012 17:29, schrieb Mailinglist:
I won't be storing for long term and won't require backing up either.
It's more for custom php to query the emails that I receive.
The influx of email will only grow over time. Writing perl scripts to
look at flat txt files I feel will be too
2012/3/2 /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100, Chris wrote:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com:
I am using Postfix
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: 02 March 2012 16:55
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Queue ID with amavisd
2012/3/2 /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM
On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
many small files while the service is running?
you can not!
While all of this is totally OT for postfix, I just had to ask - you
have heard of LVM/snapshots, right?
--
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 17:29, schrieb Mailinglist:
I won't be storing for long term and won't require backing up either.
It's more for custom php to query the emails that I receive.
The influx of email will only grow over time. Writing perl scripts
Am 02.03.2012 18:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
many small files while the service is running?
you can not!
While all of this is totally OT for postfix, I just had to ask
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 10:26, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
True, and the recommended way of handling things. However, the main
domain of the server can be the server itself, and you can restrict the
valid local mailboxes via $local_recipient_maps:
8
mydestination = $myhostname
On 2012-03-02 12:46 PM, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
thanks for your reply. However I'm not quite sure whether I've
understood your advice in the right way. What value would $myhostname
have in the above example? Because when I set $myhostname to
example.com
example.com is a FQDN, not
On 2012-03-02 12:32 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 18:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
many small files while the service is running?
you can not!
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 18:51, schrieb Charles Marcus:
name it mail.example.com, or smtp.example.com, or something like that.
Then local mail is the form u...@mail.example.com, instead of
u...@example.com.
That's exactly what I'm trying to prevent, because the PTR record for
this IP points to
On 2012-03-02 12:53 PM, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
That's exactly what I'm trying to prevent, because the PTR record for
this IP points to example.com. I'm guessing I'm getting into trouble
when there is a mismatch, because its standard procedure when trying to
block spam.
You are
--On Friday, March 02, 2012 4:31 PM +0400 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
wrote:
On 02.03.2012 16:25, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
There is ... no custom Postfix schema
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle where I can get
Greetings,
someone made this statement to me:
| The MTA will record the IP address of the server that sent the message.
| However, under some circumstances the MTA is not able to find that IP address.
how would i verify that my MTA is finding the IP?
(this may explain a lot of my issues. if
All,
I had a piece of spam slip through this morning and I'm hoping it's beneficial
that I post this information. Specifically, I'm wondering why the mail was
delivered from a host without rDNS. The relevant portion of the log is as
follows:
Mar 2 10:28:52 lollipop postfix/smtpd[3621]:
Hi!
Just for your information: not all hosts have correctly set rDNS.
I suggest you try setting up an actual spam filter (like assp,
spamassasin or other), spam is everyday harder to fight.
Ildefonso.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
All,
I had a
On 3/2/2012 1:09 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
Greetings,
someone made this statement to me:
| The MTA will record the IP address of the server that sent the message.
| However, under some circumstances the MTA is not able to find that IP
address.
Logging the client IP has nothing to do
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:46:03PM -0500, Gary Chambers wrote:
I had a piece of spam slip through this morning and I'm hoping it's
beneficial that I post this information. Specifically, I'm
wondering why the mail was delivered from a host without rDNS. The
relevant portion of the log is
On 3/2/2012 1:46 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
All,
I had a piece of spam slip through this morning and I'm hoping it's
beneficial
that I post this information. Specifically, I'm wondering why the
mail was
delivered from a host without rDNS. The relevant portion of the log
is as
follows:
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 19:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
You are mistaken.
Could you elaborate on that please? Its definitely a common way of
dealing with spam to check whether the PTR record points to the domain,
which the mailserver claims to work for.
When my PTR record points to example.com, but
On 2012-03-02 3:56 PM, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 19:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
You are mistaken.
Could you elaborate on that please? Its definitely a common way of
dealing with spam to check whether the PTR record points to the domain,
which the mailserver claims
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Best regards,
Karol Babioch
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Best regards,
Karol Babioch
Any anti-spam system that flags mail only because the sending
hostname doesn't match the
On 2012-03-02 4:19 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Any anti-spam system that flags mail only because the sending
Am 02.03.2012 22:19, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Best regards,
Karol Babioch
Any anti-spam system that flags mail only because
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:33, schrieb Reindl Harald:
theonly thing what is stronlgy recommended to match
is A-Record and PTR of the machine
Ok, maybe I've mixed something up here :). Thanks for your replies.
I've got it running now. However I've now got the problem that my
alias_maps doesn't get
Karol Babioch:
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:33, schrieb Reindl Harald:
theonly thing what is stronlgy recommended to match
is A-Record and PTR of the machine
Ok, maybe I've mixed something up here :). Thanks for your replies.
I've got it running now. However I've now got the problem that my
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 23:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Postfix will not look in alias_maps when the domain is not listed
in mydestination.
So, when I understand this right, it is not possible to define common
aliases for all virtual domains? Because virtual domains won't be listed
within
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:48:09PM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 23:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Postfix will not look in alias_maps when the domain is not
listed in mydestination.
So, when I understand this right, it is not possible to
define common aliases for all virtual
Karol Babioch:
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 23:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Postfix will not look in alias_maps when the domain is not listed
in mydestination.
So, when I understand this right, it is not possible to define common
aliases for all virtual domains? Because virtual domains won't be
59 matches
Mail list logo
