Futchko, Rose:
This message was RETURNED TO your mailman service.
That does not prove that it was SENT FROM your mailman service.
That is a great point. So, I dug a little deeper into the mail log and
found what I believe is the outbound information:
Oct 1 09:39:07
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Nope. If you were testing this more carefully then you would have
found that upper or lower case does not matter in this context.
I tested the exact same line with PERMIT and permit.
permit allowed the whitelist entry
francis picabia:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Nope. If you were testing this more carefully then you would have
found that upper or lower case does not matter in this context.
I tested the
Hello everybody,
I deliver mails to my Postfix through smtpd. Postfix then takes it and sends
it out to the recipient.
Now I'm trying to change the queue_id for each email in Postfix 2.9 source
code so that it is equal to the Message-ID (it is unique, don't worry) that
I set in the email
Am 03.10.2012 16:53, schrieb Steffen Schebesta:
I deliver mails to my Postfix through smtpd. Postfix then takes it and sends
it out to the recipient.
Now I'm trying to change the |queue_id| for each email in Postfix 2.9 source
code so that it is equal to
the |Message-ID| (it is unique,
On 02/10/12 17:14, John Hudak wrote:
I want to set up a mail server that sends mail through a relay, e.g.
smtp.google.com http://smtp.google.com and receives mail via a
domain registered at No-ip.com via email redirects. I know this is
not the 'proper' way to set up a email server, but in
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Steffen Schebesta wrote:
I deliver mails to my Postfix through smtpd. Postfix then takes it and sends
it out to the recipient.
One or more recipients. And it may receive one or more copies of
the original message if it was sent to many recipients.
On 10/3/2012 9:53 AM, Steffen Schebesta wrote:
Now I'm trying to change the |queue_id| for each email in Postfix
2.9 source code so that it is equal to the |Message-ID| (it is
unique, don't worry) that I set in the email header when passing the
email to Postfix through smtpd.
Why?
At any
Steffen Schebesta:
Hello everybody,
I deliver mails to my Postfix through smtpd. Postfix then takes it and sends
it out to the recipient.
Now I'm trying to change the queue_id for each email in Postfix 2.9 source
code so that it is equal to the Message-ID (it is unique, don't worry) that
I
I recently updated a Postfix system from 2.4 to 2.9 and I have found
what I believe is a change in behavior for reject_unknown_sender_domain
which is confusing. In the past, an effective means of dealing with some
classes of persistent spammers was to tell the local DNS resolver (BIND
9) to
On 10/3/2012 1:15 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
I recently updated a Postfix system from 2.4 to 2.9 and I have found
what I believe is a change in behavior for
reject_unknown_sender_domain which is confusing. In the past, an
effective means of dealing with some classes of persistent spammers
was to
Bill Cole:
I recently updated a Postfix system from 2.4 to 2.9 and I have found
what I believe is a change in behavior for reject_unknown_sender_domain
which is confusing. In the past, an effective means of dealing with some
Sort answer: Postfix does not pass SERVFAIL, it just rejects them
Alumno Etsii:
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
In this table, there is a row with value: devels.es
So why is this still happening?
What is the result for:
postmap -q devels.es mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
Wietse
On 10/3/2012 1:28 PM, Alumno Etsii wrote:
2012/10/2 Dennis Guhl li...@dguhl.org mailto:li...@dguhl.org
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:54:02AM +0100, Alumno Etsii wrote:
Hi list!
Yesterday I was experimenting with the DNS registries assigned
to my mail
server.
2012/10/3 Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
On 10/3/2012 1:28 PM, Alumno Etsii wrote:
2012/10/2 Dennis Guhl li...@dguhl.org mailto:li...@dguhl.org
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:54:02AM +0100, Alumno Etsii wrote:
Hi list!
Yesterday I was experimenting with the DNS
Wietse Venema:
Alumno Etsii:
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
In this table, there is a row with value: devels.es
So why is this still happening?
What is the result for:
postmap -q devels.es mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
Alumno Etsii:
postmap -q devels.es mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
If this returns devels.es, then Postfix will try to deliver to the
service specified with virtual_transport instead of the relayhost.
What is the output from:
postconf virtual_transport
On 3 Oct 2012, at 14:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bill Cole:
I recently updated a Postfix system from 2.4 to 2.9 and I have found
what I believe is a change in behavior for
reject_unknown_sender_domain
which is confusing. In the past, an effective means of dealing with
some
Sort answer:
Hi,
I just recently made some changes for one of the users that I have on my
system. Their request was a simple change to forward mail to another off
server account as well as deliver it locally. I made the changes in postfix
admin without issue but they are concerned that they are now
DNS is definitely failing for dfleur.com, as the hit on the SA rule
NO_DNS_FOR_FROM indicates and as confirmed by a manual query:
~$ dig dfleur.com mx
; DiG 9.8.1-P1 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47102
;; flags: qr rd ra;
Bill Cole:
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
How will I reproduce this quickly?
Wietse
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:00:05PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
reject_unknown_sender_domain
This is what I would expect, based on the documentation. However, it
is accepting and delivering mail whose sender domain yields a
SERVFAIL and I can't figure out why. Note that as I stated in my
first
On 3 Oct 2012, at 16:21, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
DNS is definitely failing for dfleur.com, as the hit on the SA rule
NO_DNS_FOR_FROM indicates and as confirmed by a manual query:
~$ dig dfleur.com mx
; DiG 9.8.1-P1 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 16:00 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
lazarus:~# dig dfleur.com mx
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
...
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 3 15:07:35 2012
Your locally installed DNS
You report:
# postconf -n
...
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
# postmap -q devels.es mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
devels.es
# postconf virtual_transport
virtual_transport = virtual
This means that mail for devels.es is given to the
2012/10/3 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
You report:
# postconf -n
...
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/
mysql-virtual_domains.cf
# postmap -q devels.es mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
devels.es
# postconf virtual_transport
virtual_transport = virtual
Thanks for all the insightful answers.
So, I actually use the long_queue_ids options and I save the queue_ids to a
database to later compare them to the queue_ids found in the mail log to
parse and mark the bounces.
The problem - and thus the source for my question - is that this always
means a
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:26:33PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bill Cole:
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
How will I reproduce this quickly?
Comcast owns dnssec-failed.org, a zone set up with
On 3 Oct 2012, at 16:26, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bill Cole:
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
How will I reproduce this quickly?
I am not sure. If your resolver is BIND you can make dfleur.com (and as
On 3 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Stefan Palme wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 16:00 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
lazarus:~# dig dfleur.com mx
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
...
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 3
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:35:59PM -0500, I wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:26:33PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bill Cole:
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
How will I reproduce this
On 3 Oct 2012, at 14:46, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/3/2012 1:15 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
I recently updated a Postfix system from 2.4 to 2.9 and I have found
what I believe is a change in behavior for
reject_unknown_sender_domain which is confusing. In the past, an
effective means of dealing with
Wietse Venema:
Bill Cole:
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
Net::DNS::Nameserver to the rescue, with a trivial reply handler of:
sub reply_handler
{
my ($qname, $qclass, $qtype,
Bill Cole:
On 3 Oct 2012, at 16:26, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bill Cole:
; DiG 9.9.1-P3 dfleur.com mx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 41183
How will I reproduce this quickly?
I am not sure. If your resolver is BIND you can
Predictably, the cause of this odd behavior was in fact external to
Postfix.
The server has 3 DNS servers in resolv.conf: itself, another one sitting
across the room, and a third far away which was added in the same
disaster recovery event that precipitated the upgrade from 2.4.5 to
2.9.3 a
Let me add to this question since I've been digging further, and racking my
brain for a simple solution.
If you have postfix with postfixadmin , mysql, spamassassin, maildrop
configured and working where it is calling the default maildroprc file in
/etc,
Is there still a way to call a 2nd
36 matches
Mail list logo
