On Apr 13, 2013, at 00:50, b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 15.25, Joan Moreau j...@grosjo.net wrote:
Hi,
I am stuck with making my SSL SMTPS (port 465) works, while it was working
fine since ever.
others have helped with the specifics of your question, so i'll address the
On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN ha...@erios.org wrote:
a Linux server
It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux?
--
you'd think you could trust a horde of hungarian barbarians
Mmhhh... What can I say???
If somebody can make the full product working on another platform, then
I would be happy to propose the corresponding archive on Sourceforge
available files project page...
But for now the best answer is simply it's like that. ;)
Le 13/04/2013 11:31, LuKreme a
yes, I kind of agree with you, however, would it be with SSL or
STARTTLS, I get the same error (which did not appear before I upgraded
my kernel)
What could be the solution ?
Le 12/04/2013 22:50, b...@bitrate.net a écrit :
On Apr 12, 2013, at 15.25, Joan Moreau j...@grosjo.net wrote:
This lead to a error 404.
Maybe can you rather explain how toppost would solve the SSL problem ?
Thank in advance
joan
Le 12/04/2013 22:14, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Friday, April 12, 2013 9:05 PM + Joan Moreau j...@grosjo.net
wrote:
Please don't top-post. I do not
Am 13.04.2013 12:43, schrieb Joan Moreau:
This lead to a error 404.
Maybe can you rather explain how toppost would solve the SSL problem?
you should post your reply BELOW the quote to make a thread
readable by people which may come later to it and they may
ignore it if it is unreadable for
[ Top-posting fixed ]
Le 13/04/2013 11:31, LuKreme a écrit :
On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN ha...@erios.org wrote:
a Linux server
It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux?
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Nicolas HAHN wrote:
Mmhhh... What can I say???
If somebody can
On Apr 13, 2013, at 8:17 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
I think the point is that none of the software you mention are
Linux-specific. Postfix, PostgreSQL, rsyslog, apache (Apache
httpd), and php all work and are commonly seen on other Unix and
Unix-like systems. It doesn't sound
Le 12/04/2013 23:05, Joan Moreau a écrit :
Please don't top-post.
I do not understand
smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 is sufficient for debugging.
ok
2013-04-12T21:49:03.160443+02:00 server postfix/smtpd[12238]:
warning: TLS library problem: 12238:error:1409D08A:SSL
Le 13/04/2013 15:17, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
I think the point is that none of the software you mention are
Linux-specific. Postfix, PostgreSQL, rsyslog, apache (Apache httpd),
and php all work and are commonly seen on other Unix and Unix-like
systems. It doesn't sound likely that you have done
* Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:27:26 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
* Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Very useful, thank you for writing and sharing. May I suggest the
english Wiki-article for background on backscatter?
URL?
Sorry,
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 05:10:09 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
...
In our previous episode (Thursday, 11-Apr-2013), Sahil Tandon said:
As documented, Postfix uses the default Berkeley DB version that ships
with your system, which I am assuming is FreeBSD.
Yes, FreeBSD VeryOld-stable.
Then
Dear Community,
I just released *version 0.9.11* of the tool.
This version is the *first one to include Microsoft Exchange Server Logs
parsing capabilities*.
README including versionning info as well as archive are available there:
Hi. The situation is as follows:
I get all my mail to my domain to the web hotel where I've registered the
domain.
I fetch my mail using Fetchmail and deliver it to my server running
Dovecot + Postfix.
Outgoing mail is relayed to my ISP.
The problem is that my wife has an email account at my
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 03:40:59PM +0200, mouss wrote:
2013-04-12T21:49:03.160443+02:00 server postfix/smtpd[12238]:
warning: TLS library problem: 12238:error:1409D08A:SSL
routines:ssl3_setup_key_block:cipher or hash unavailable:s3_enc.c:423:
This suggests your TLS library is broken.
Le 13/04/2013 13:40, mouss a écrit :
Le 12/04/2013 23:05, Joan Moreau a écrit :
Please don't top-post. I do not understand smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 is
sufficient for debugging. ok 2013-04-12T21:49:03.160443+02:00 server
postfix/smtpd[12238]: warning: TLS library problem:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick
sanity check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new
smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-)
smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_unauth_destination
Am 13.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Russell Jones:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity
check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup
is sane with the new smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-)
if your setup was safe before it is now also and with the
On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones russ...@jonesmail.me wrote:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity
check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new
smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-)
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
Am 13.04.2013 21:42, schrieb b...@bitrate.net:
On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones russ...@jonesmail.me wrote:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity
check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new
On 4/13/2013 2:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i would ALWAYS include reject_unauth_destination BEFORE check_client_access
here
Thanks Reindl!
It was before, however I read on the Postfix docs that
reject_unauth_destination is no longer necessary in the
recipient_restrictions section, hence
On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.48, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 13.04.2013 21:42, schrieb b...@bitrate.net:
On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones russ...@jonesmail.me wrote:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity
check to
Am 13.04.2013 22:36, schrieb b...@bitrate.net:
fine - in the real life you start not from scratch
in the real world, both [and more] things happen.
and another in the subject is a clear sign
have fun calling hundrets and thousands of users especially with broken
clients like a iPhone and
On Apr 13, 2013, at 16.03, Russell Jones russ...@jonesmail.me wrote:
really, neither of permit_mynetworks nor permit_sasl_authenticated belong
in any global restrictions.
smtp auth [e.g sasl] is for submission clients, which should be using
submission/587, and these days,
This is
On Apr 13, 2013, at 16.40, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
that your discourage use of permit_mynetworks is far from reality as
also do not use SASAL and submission on port 25 as well if someone
asks for ANOTHER sanity check after upgrade to a new version?
i'm not sure why it
On 4/13/2013 3:44 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote:
you offer no service whatsoever on port 25? postfix is not listening on that
port? if that's truly the case, then, to be pedantic, you're running an msa,
not an mta, in which case you could argue that is an exception to the rule, and
such
I having some trouble debugging a generic_maps problem. My master.conf
contains this:
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
/etc/postfix/generic contains this (sanitized):
myaddr...@mydomain.comotheraddr...@mydomain.com
In the log, when I send email from
On Apr 13, 2013, at 17.10, Russell Jones russ...@jonesmail.me wrote:
On 4/13/2013 3:44 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote:
you offer no service whatsoever on port 25? postfix is not listening on
that port? if that's truly the case, then, to be pedantic, you're running
an msa, not an mta, in
awingnut:
I having some trouble debugging a generic_maps problem. My master.conf
contains this:
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
/etc/postfix/generic contains this (sanitized):
myaddr...@mydomain.comotheraddr...@mydomain.com
As documented, this is a Postfix
On 4/13/2013 6:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
awingnut:
I having some trouble debugging a generic_maps problem. My master.conf
contains this:
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
/etc/postfix/generic contains this (sanitized):
myaddr...@mydomain.com
awingnut:
Thanks. I was hoping qmgr was after smtp so that really tells me nothing
then. I don't see any thing in the log with the string
otheraddr...@mydomain.com. I followed the instructions for generic
mapping but it seems to not be working. Mail is being refused by my ISP
because it is
31 matches
Mail list logo
