On 5/5/2013 8:10 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Received: from carotte.tilapin.org (unknown [95.138.72.61])
by ioooi.vinc17.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA4959
for vinc...@vinc17.net; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:15:23 +0200 (CEST)
$ host 95.138.72.61
Host 61.72.138.95.in-addr.arpa.
Hi,
thanks for tip. I may be something missed:
In main.cf I've added:
address_verify_relayhost = 19.13.13.11 #ip of my mail server that
knows all users
address_verify_sender = mas...@mojedomena.cz
communication between this incoming server and final imap server
(between them is
Am 06.05.2013 15:08, schrieb Josef Karliak:
communication between this incoming server and final imap server
at my knwoledge this dont work verify is done over smtp, you may ask for
relay permit ,over imap via saslauthd
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49
Josef Karliak:
Hi,
thanks for tip. I may be something missed:
In main.cf I've added:
address_verify_relayhost = 19.13.13.11 #ip of my mail server that
knows all users
address_verify_sender = mas...@mojedomena.cz
This overrides the relayhost setting, which is used ONLY for
REMOTE
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 06:44:23PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
May 5 20:35:31 mail postfix/master[2888]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtp pid 2954 killed by signal 11
Thanks. Do you have a stack trace or core dump?
Ralf sent be a stack trace captured via:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 06:44:23PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
May 5 20:35:31 mail postfix/master[2888]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtp pid 2954 killed by signal 11
Thanks. Do you have a stack trace or core dump?
Ralf sent be a stack trace captured
Let me try again. I am assuming the link between a line in the
dndsbl_reply file and the main.cf file is only a label and it could be
anything.
Is that a wrong assumption?
I have changed the label to make it more obvious.
Right now in the dnsbl_reply file I have this line (except for the key
Robert Lopez:
Let me try again. I am assuming the link between a line in the
dndsbl_reply file and the main.cf file is only a label and it could be
anything.
Is that a wrong assumption?
Please describe what is not clear about the following text:
postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map (default: empty)
On 2013-05-06 01:10:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/5/2013 8:10 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Received: from carotte.tilapin.org (unknown [95.138.72.61])
by ioooi.vinc17.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA4959
for vinc...@vinc17.net; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:15:23 +0200 (CEST)
Am 06.05.2013 23:13, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
Being a Debian developer carries zero weight here.
I just meant that
* his mail config is probably sane (the fact that the IP doesn't
have a rDNS is not his fault, but the ISP's)
no, it's clearly his fault
how should the ISP smell which
Is it possible that the key is being exposed not from the
postscreen_dnsbl_sites line but from a line also in main.cf which says
the following?
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rbl_client hidden-key.zen.dq.spamhaus.net
Use rbl_reply_maps and a text without $rbl_domain:
Jan P. Kessler:
Is it possible that the key is being exposed not from the
postscreen_dnsbl_sites line but from a line also in main.cf which says
the following?
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rbl_client
hidden-key.zen.dq.spamhaus.net
Yes. Postfix logging will tell you which
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:13:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2013-05-06 01:10:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/5/2013 8:10 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Received: from carotte.tilapin.org (unknown [95.138.72.61])
by ioooi.vinc17.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA4959
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 06:48:36AM -0500, I wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 06:27:15PM -0600, Robert Lopez wrote:
I had
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = the-key-to-hidezen.dq.spamhaus.org
This is right.
Let me try again also! I presume your lookup is actually against
key.zen.dq.spamhaus.org.
On 2013-05-06 18:54:57 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:13:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2013-05-06 01:10:59 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/5/2013 8:10 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Received: from carotte.tilapin.org (unknown [95.138.72.61])
by
15 matches
Mail list logo
