On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:06, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
I have a account that is managed via sql and has an alias in
mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
I would like to do some processing on emails before they are
forwarded along to the alias, but I don?t see a way to
Hi,
I'm trying to compile postfix 3.0 on Solaris 11(.2) with Solaris
Studio(12.4) cc.
It works fine with last postfix-2.11.3 (same host/OS and cc).
With 3.0, it seems makefiles passed the following options
to cc
-UUSE_DYNAMIC_LIBS -DDEF_SHLIB_DIR=\no\ -UUSE_DYNAMIC_MAPS
-Wmissing-prototypes
has somebody an idea for the chicken egg problem that postfix-install
in the %installof a RPM-spec can't load the shared libraries which are
built but not installed at that moment?
+ sh postfix-install -non-interactive
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
%install
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/lib sh postfix-install -package -non-interactive
install_root=%{buildroot} config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
On 2/12/2015 2:26 PM, LuKreme wrote:
I believe I have the spams-milter working with postfix
main.cf
milter_default_action = accept
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock
The spams-milter is running:
spamd32770 0.2 3.3 82164 67496 ?? S 1:14PM 0:11.22 spamd
Last question! (I hope ...)
I also posted this on the cyrus mailing list but more aimed at a proper
fix. I have a problem with cyrus lmtp delivery and case sensitive domain
names(!).
This gets through : u...@domain.foo
This does not : u...@domain.foo
with lmtp_downcase_rcpt: 1 set in
On 2/12/2015 4:33 PM, Carl Brewer wrote:
Last question! (I hope ...)
I also posted this on the cyrus mailing list but more aimed at a
proper fix. I have a problem with cyrus lmtp delivery and case
sensitive domain names(!).
This gets through : u...@domain.foo
This does not :
Am 12.02.2015 um 23:56 schrieb LuKreme:
On 12 Feb 2015, at 13:42 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
spamass-milter uses the standard spamassassin spamc/spamd interface.
I believe you can enable additional spamass-milter logging on its
startup command line.
There are startup flags you
Am 12.02.2015 um 21:26 schrieb LuKreme:
I believe I have the spams-milter working with postfix
main.cf
milter_default_action = accept
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock
Two questions. Wouldn’t the log show the milter instead of spamd?
no
And now that this is working, how do
I believe I have the spams-milter working with postfix
main.cf
milter_default_action = accept
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock
The spams-milter is running:
spamd32770 0.2 3.3 82164 67496 ?? S 1:14PM 0:11.22 spamd
child (perl)
root 32769 0.0 3.0 73972
On 12 Feb 2015, at 15:33 , Carl Brewer c...@bl.echidna.id.au wrote:
Last question! (I hope ...)
I also posted this on the cyrus mailing list but more aimed at a proper fix.
I have a problem with cyrus lmtp delivery and case sensitive domain names(!).
This gets through : u...@domain.foo
Two questions. Wouldn't the log show the milter instead of spamd?
spamass-milter is merely a protocol adapter. The real work
is done elsewhere. http://linux.die.net/man/1/spamass-milter
And now that this is working, how do I reject incoming messages
based on their score (for example, say I
On 12 Feb 2015, at 16:08 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 2/12/2015 4:56 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 12 Feb 2015, at 13:42 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
spamass-milter uses the standard spamassassin spamc/spamd interface.
I believe you can enable additional spamass-milter
On 2/12/2015 4:56 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 12 Feb 2015, at 13:42 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
spamass-milter uses the standard spamassassin spamc/spamd interface.
I believe you can enable additional spamass-milter logging on its
startup command line.
There are startup flags you
On 13/02/2015 10:01 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
You need to fix this in cyrus. I don't use cyrus, but surely this is
some sort of configuration issue.
Older versions of postfix could do a gross hack where a wildcard
regexp would lowercase the input. This is probably what you've
found on the web.
On 02/12/2015 11:20 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
has somebody an idea for the chicken egg problem that postfix-install
in the %installof a RPM-spec can't load the shared libraries which are
built but not installed at that moment?
I changed it to make non-interactive-package and it works just
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:33:52AM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
Feb 13 08:36:33 postfix/lmtp[8436]: CBA4A1B3D4A3:
to=c...@aboc.com.au,
relay=rollcage3.bl.echidna.id.au[/var/imap/socket/lmtp], delay=0,
delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=2.1.5, status=deliverable (250 2.1.5 ok)
As a work-around:
The Postfix
Hey all,
Is it supported to override virtual_alias_maps in master.cf; rather than
using receive_override_options to disable all address rewriting?
I want to do some alias expansion prior to content_filter, and a different
alias expansion on re-injection.
Right now I have to do all
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke
li...@rhsoft.net:
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
i did that as you can see on bottom if the message you responded to
make install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You
This is the tricks for rpmbuild. postconf relies on
%{postfix_lib_dir}libpostfix-global.so for postfix-install.
- - postfix.spec --
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{postfix_lib_dir}
if [ ! -f %{postfix_lib_dir}/libpostfix-global.so ] ; then
mkdir -p %{postfix_lib_dir}
install lib/libpostfix-global.so
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions
besides that SPEC is
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions.
Wietse
Jean-Christophe Delaye:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile postfix 3.0 on Solaris 11(.2) with Solaris
Studio(12.4) cc.
It works fine with last postfix-2.11.3 (same host/OS and cc).
With 3.0, it seems makefiles passed the following options
to cc
-UUSE_DYNAMIC_LIBS -DDEF_SHLIB_DIR=\no\
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it
On 12/02/15 14:19, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jean-Christophe Delaye:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile postfix 3.0 on Solaris 11(.2) with Solaris
Studio(12.4) cc.
It works fine with last postfix-2.11.3 (same host/OS and cc).
With 3.0, it seems makefiles passed the following options
to cc
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:58:39PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
that below works like a charm:
make non-interactive-package install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
flames about rpm crap
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:30:46PM +0100, Jean-Christophe Delaye wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile postfix 3.0 on Solaris 11(.2) with Solaris
Studio(12.4) cc.
On Solaris, I always built Postfix with gcc from /opt/sfw or a
suitable private build of GCC.
The Sun compilers are not widely used,
Jean-Christophe Delaye:
milter.c, line 546: non-constant initializer involving a cast
milter.c, line 547: non-constant initializer involving a cast
milter.c, line 548: non-constant initializer involving a cast
milter.c, line 552: non-constant initializer involving a cast
milter.c, line 553:
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
i did that as you can see on bottom if the message you responded to
make install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
li...@rhsoft.net:
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
interesting attitude in context of subject rpmbuild and shared=yes
Please stick to the supported interfaces:
make makefiles name=value...
the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which
*both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for
interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades
would make install just work non-interactive problem gone
# make install (interactive
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
interesting attitude in context of subject rpmbuild and shared=yes
Please stick to the supported
Andrew Ho:
sh postfix-install -non-interactive \
THIS IS NOT SUPPORTED. USE MAKE INSTALL.
Wietse
li...@rhsoft.net:
the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which
*both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for
interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades
would make install just work non-interactive problem gone
# make
On 2/12/2015 12:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E42212DC0
for *bob*@covisp.net; Tue, 10 Feb 2015
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which
*both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for
interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades
would make install just work
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which
*both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for
interactive and no business for
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:29:37PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
The only difference between install and upgrade is that one is
interactive and the other is not. That is, install is an upgrade
from zero with all the answers pre-determined
make install -non-interactive simply ends in
LuKreme:
I have a account that is managed via sql and has an alias in
mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
I would like to do some processing on emails before they are
forwarded along to the alias, but I don?t see a way to interject
some process (say, procmail or spam or clamav) in that part of
On 12/02/15 17:26, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:30:46PM +0100, Jean-Christophe Delaye wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile postfix 3.0 on Solaris 11(.2) with Solaris
Studio(12.4) cc.
On Solaris, I always built Postfix with gcc from /opt/sfw or a
suitable private build of
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive?
As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive
install.
I believe he does not want an install
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive?
As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive?
As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive?
As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive
install.
I believe he does
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it
works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it
works and that the
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:58:39PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
that below works like a charm:
make non-interactive-package install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
On 12 Feb 2015, at 08:25 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 2/12/2015 12:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:33 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of
I have a account that is managed via sql and has an alias in
mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
I would like to do some processing on emails before they are forwarded along to
the alias, but I don’t see a way to interject some process (say, procmail or
spam or clamav) in that part of the process.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:47:40PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
well, you are not able to admit a mistake, so be it
Let him who is without sin...
Without a clear statement what you want (build installable package) is
ridiculous ...
Not everyone is going to read between the lines. I tend
56 matches
Mail list logo
