Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:24 PM, J Doe wrote: > > That actually reminded me of something that crossed my mind, today - I forgot > about the inherently dynamic nature of routing. > > Even though my server is within North America and it is extremely likely that > I am

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > > If you're only connecting to google over a decent internet link, I > doubt you'll see any effect whatsoever. Kinda like me using polar > bear bait in Tennessee. > > -- Noel Jones Hi Noel, That actually reminded me

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

On 12/5/2017 11:30 AM, J Doe wrote: > Hi Noel and Wietse, > > Thank you for your prompt feedback. > > I think (in the quest to explore this more fully), I will try enabling this > for a short term and see what sort of TLS issues I may have. The server I > described in previous mails is low

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

Hi Noel and Wietse, Thank you for your prompt feedback. I think (in the quest to explore this more fully), I will try enabling this for a short term and see what sort of TLS issues I may have. The server I described in previous mails is low volume so I believe it’s ideal for testing