On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:45:32PM +0200, Niemi Hannu wrote:
I have been fighting with a problem with Postfix. There are some users that
insist on sending mail to large groups of recipients (yes I know that mailman
or similar is made for that) and there is a limit of number of recipients,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:07:40PM -0600, Kim Albee wrote:
Is there a filter or a mod that can be made to Postfix that would have the
process that handles bounced emails within Postfix send the email to a
different email address (i.e. email identified in specific header variable)
rather than
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:18:41AM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
Hi all, im reading the docs about setting postifx with multiples
instances [1]. At the Setting up the null-client Postfix instance
part, there is a sample main.cf which will be a local-submission null
client: file, with this:
.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:16:41AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Same what? Can someone explain the observed issue in some detail?
All I am seeing is questions about an ill-advised hypothetical solution.
When I put my Cyrillic name into Apple's MUA, the From: header read:
From:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:55:13PM +0100, Sylvain Ferrand wrote:
Hello,
I would like to overwrite the display-name (i.e. the sender description
string in the the From: field. - cf. RFC 5322 sec 3.4) set by the MUA. Is
it possible to rewrite the display-name (1) in the From: header on a
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:12:05PM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
There is no wrong To-Header. File a bug-report with Mozilla.
That's what i tried to find out: Who is at fault and what is the
root-case...
If the bug is still present in TB3 i will bother to file a bug.
I failed to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:16:56PM +, Michele Carandente wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm still looking for the right solution...
As I said before, I was thinking to put in a cronjob the command
postsuper -h ALL, but in that case I'll put in hold also the emails
that are in queue because maybe
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:46:10PM -0500, zhong ming wu wrote:
With dovecot I can have my mail client send a certificate and make
dovecote use CN field of the cert as username
to authenticate. If I enable that feature in dovecot, postfix
authentication does not work despite the fact that I
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:23AM -0800, motty cruz wrote:
If I use the command
# mail -v n...@domain.com I get the folloing
Mail delivery status report will be mailed to root
But then I get MAILER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable)
Using FreeBSD 7.2
Postfix 2.6.5
And second instance
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:17:35AM -0800, motty cruz wrote:
Filter # mail -v mo...@domain.com
Subject: test postfix conf
debug_peer_list = 127.0.0.1
.
EOT
Mail Delivery Status Report will be mailed to root.
Filter # mailq
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:26:23AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
Not all the world
is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
This is a technical mailing list. When you claim that
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:15:59PM +0100, Andrzej Kuku??a wrote:
Thanks, I just didn't know it's platform specific... I thought of
master(8) command line arguments that are displayed but ignored -- but
it's not really THAT important.
The master(8) daemon changing its argument vector is not
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
So the first one is correct and the second one not??
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F6fler=2C_Verena?= xx...@x.de
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=27=22H=F6fler=2C_Martin=22=27?= xx...@kwsoft.de
This was within one mail from
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:57:54PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Can anybody comment on this ugly fix for Umlauts in realnames?
# Already with Quotes (=22) thus do nothing
/^From: =\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?=22(.*)=22\?= (.*)$/ REPLACE From:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22$1=22?= $2
# No quotes
/^From:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:26:53PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
if (space or special characters in realname)
return encode(add_quotes(realname))
else
return realname
fi
No, if you encode, you don't add quotes, quotes are for ASCII data that
contains special characters.
For
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The rules for display names are in RFC*22. Look for the ABNF for
display-name, phrase, word, and atom.
Short answer: as long as =?iso-8859-1?Q?stuff?= looks like an
RFC2822 atom, it needs no quoting.
And of course, RFC 2047
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
require to store all logs of deliveries/bounces by some law.
They have requirements like
* The log should contain the full date including year
* The log line should
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
Hi,
I just installed postfix 2.7.0.
WIthout changes to the existing configuration of 2.6.5 I get this error
using procmail as my mailbox_command:
Feb 19 18:34:29 adrianvb postfix/local[14290]: BD85F7006D:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:16:37PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
Well, Postfix just executes procmail via your shell (when mailbox_command
contains shell metacharacters). Don't blame the messenger. The error message
is from your shell
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:05:09PM +0100, S?bastien WENSKE wrote:
Hi list,
I have added on the bottom of my header_check file:
/^(cc|to): undisclosed-recipients:;/REJECT
This is a very poorly thought out anti-spam measure. Deploy a real
spam filter. Don't get creative with
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 02:13:11PM +1000, P1aGu3 wrote:
For example:
The organisation has mydomain.com as their $mydomain.
They email someone at postfix.org. Or someone from postfix.org emails
someone at mydomain.com
The filter box matches the To/From as not being in $mydomain and creates a
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 13.2.2010, at 0.41, Victor Duchovni wrote:
No, this is largely irrelevant. What matters is the IMAP performance
they expect, that IMAP servers are reasonably CPU and memory intensive.
From what I've seen is that IMAP
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:25:12PM +0100, Stefan Palme wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 14:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
content_filter and FILTER have precedence over all routing mechanisms
in Postfix including transport_maps, relayhost, address classes, etc.
Ok, but if I have a very simple
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:46:31PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_access,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:11:54PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
The key * is not defined (man 5 access)
Are you sure using the HELO is a smart idea?
The OP is not using a HELO check, it is a check_client_access check.
He
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:08:21PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I noticed in the release notes that Postfix 2.7 receives the full
message before sending it to the before-queue milter, but I don't think
this addresses the concern.
Milter applications see SMTP commands as they happen.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:14:30PM -, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
My current server has 256MB RAM (It's a VM on slicehost). How many users do
you think that will handle?
Is more RAM substantially more expensive? 256 MB is rather meek these days.
With physical servers, one typically gets 16GB
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:17:26PM -0500, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
If you want to give your client good advice, you will have to measure
their mail flow in a meaningful way.
How many messages per second, minute, hour, day do you need to handle?
How many concurrent SMTP sessions? Do they even care
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 06:24:59PM -0500, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
If spam filtering is going to be used, it would be wise to consider
those requirements as well.
A host with 256MB of RAM is not going to be doing much heavy lifting
with content inspection.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:13:52PM -0800, Jeff Lacki wrote:
I get 'fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' in maillog
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
Do you know what this parameter setting does?
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:55:52PM -0800, Jeff Lacki wrote:
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
Do you know what this parameter setting does?
Not exactly, Ive been reading all kinds of docs and since
Im new to some of it, Im a little confused between
SASL and TLS. I've used postfix for a while
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:22:41AM +, Michele Carandente wrote:
I agree that the cron job solution is not the best one... but at the
moment it is the only one that I'm able to offer...
(Even if with a cron job every 5 seconds(for example), I'll not lose
any emails...)
As Noel Jones
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:15:59PM +0100, Stefan Palme wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_policy_service unix:private/postgrey,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:44:16AM +, Michele Carandente wrote:
I'll try again to find a way to put emails in HOLD
automatically...otherwise I'll add a cronjob with the command:
'postsuper -h ALL'
The cron job will be completely ineffective. It will miss all mail that
is delivered between
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:54:31PM -0800, Otto Hirr wrote:
It shows for virtual
postmas...@example.com postmaster
But then it states:
Line 18: This example assumes that in main.cf, $myorigin is
listed under the mydestination parameter setting.
This is just part of the story, you alias
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:57:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The real problem is that DEBIAN has not caught up on changes in
Postfix file locations. When multi-instance support was introduced,
it was necessary to move files such as postfix-script and postfix-files
from (non-shared)
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:49:44PM +, Michele Carandente wrote:
Well, I'm making a kind of GUI because it must be implemented in
another product.
Anyway, coming back to my old question, I think I'm ok with SMTP
authentication.
Now I've just to setup how to change the encryption (SSL
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 05:22:41PM +, Michele Carandente wrote:
smtp_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/smtpd.cert
smtp_tls_key_file = /etc/postfix/smtpd.key
Set these empty, you don't need them.
smtp_use_tls = yes
Obsolete, set:
smtp_tls_security_level = may
smtp_tls_scert_verifydepth
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:32:05PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
The TLS caches won't get automatic cleanups in the initial 2.7
release(s)?
Oh, and where is postscreen(8)?
In the 2.8 snapshot release.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 02:17:21PM -0200, rafa wrote:
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by icbu211.cnmail.cnh.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B02317B0191
for m...@foo.net; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 22:30:58 +0800 (CST)
Perhaps this is Zimbra...
--
Viktor.
P.S.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
spamv...@googlemail.com:
hi..
my postfix checks against openldap.
postfix first uses the ldap-aliases.cf to check if its a valid user
email, that works.
then i tried to use the same ldap-aliases.cf for
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:05:18PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/2/2010 11:11 AM, Michele Carandente wrote:
Hi Noel,
Thanks for the corrections... anyway this solution doen't solve the
problem that I have.
Sorry, that's the only solution I have to offer.
The OP is perhaps better off
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:47:31AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On 02.02.2010 15:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Hi,
And, use proxy:ldap:${config_directory}/ldap-aliases.cf, LDAP servers
typically don't like the connection concurrency that results from each
smtpd(8) and cleanup(8) using
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:57:30PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
jep that query works
postmap -q rob...@schetterer.org
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sasl_login_maps-test.cf
@schetterer.org rob...@schetterer.org
This is the wrong result format. The value retuned must be a comma
separated list
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:30:45PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
@domain.de username
which works as desired
As documented, in indexed files the first non-whitespace token is the
lookup *key*, and
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
@domain.de username
which works as desired
As documented, in indexed files the first non-whitespace token is the
lookup
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:06:51PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
this works
query = SELECT username FROM domain_admins WHERE domain='%d'
UNION SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1
Yes, a user can send mail as himself, and a domain admin can send email
as
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:48:26AM -0600, adrian ilarion ciobanu wrote:
queue, and served by dedicated servers as in:
http://www.plonk.de/sw/odmr/
odmr is mail relaying. if one chooses this solution then one probably
No, because with ODMR one cannot relay until some unspecified
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:13:33PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
If in a mail cluster, with multiple machines having access to a shared
storage device (SAN, iSCSI) which is presented to the host as a normal
block device (e.g. /dev/sda, hosting a normal ext3 filesystem), one of
the mail nodes
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:39:34PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
Only needed when restoring from backups, copying queue files, ... Not
needed when mounting a filesystem.
I think the manpage for postsuper recommends executing it at least
once before starting up Postfix. Can it do any harm
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:41:03PM -0600, AMP Admin wrote:
just in case anyone comes across this I got it sorted with the following:
/^Subject: .*/ PREPEND MyString
This is still wrong.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/email
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:54:25PM -0600, adrian ilarion ciobanu wrote:
Using login names as next-hop destination? I am not sure I like
this user interface.
well the next hop in the case of atrn IS the connection authenticated
for the user more than anythin else. i believe there's nothing
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:40:43PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
1) What is the need for ATRN in the first place? What are the
options (VPN, ETRN + dynamic DNS, ...). I find almost no information
about supported ATRN solutions with other major MTAs (not counting
qmail patches here), so it is
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:44:07PM -0500, Andrew Nady wrote:
Thanks for the info, let me give you a more detailed scenario.
The mailgateways (postfix ldap) on both sides do OU based verification
against MS AD,
so the serveron Canada side will query the ou=Canada,dc=domain,dc=local
and the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:45:25PM -0600, adrian ilarion ciobanu wrote:
Instead of using a DOMAIN_PORT kludge which requires reserving
a TCP port or UNIX-domain pathname per customer, it would make
sense to use the existing Postfix connection caching mechanism.
The idea is to push an
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:40:40PM -0600, adrian ilarion ciobanu wrote:
So I would push the socket to scache after I'm done setting it up
from SMTPD (auth, policy checks) and forget about it. If it times
out before local smtp will start deliver then the client is welcome to
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:26:15PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Then the transport map would look like:
example.com atrn:[example.com]
example.org atrn:[example.org]
ATRN supports multi-domain requests either explicitly or implicitly,
in which case the domain - nexthop
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54:37PM -0500, Andrew Nady wrote:
Is it possible to provide email service with postfix for a single
domain that spans on multiple mailservers?
Yes. If you choose a single Internet-facing domain for geographically
diverse organization, you must arrange for internal
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:08:40PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
In case of severe server overload, with postscreen(8) complaining
about lookup and update times around 400ms almost every mail, is it
(reasonably) safe as a last desperate measure to put $data_directory,
or at least the file
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Jelle de Jong wrote:
postconf -e 'smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2, !TLSv1'
Why disable both SSLv2 and TLSv1?! Leave this setting at its default
value, or disable just SSLv2. Does your client or server correctly handle
SSLv3, but fail to
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than the
obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
Hm, you could try and alias soli...@example.com to
soli...@example.com
But how???
The
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The lookup keys and RHS values for virtual(5) are in rfc822 format.
A PCRE table can take care of this:
Virtual alias lookups are done in the unquoted form, while
canonical map lookups are in quoted form.
No, the cleanup(8)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:33:58AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
One could argue that the SMTP server should use the external form of the
recipient for these lookup, to match downstream behaviour in cleanup(8)...
Indeed. There was no address validation in the initial design and
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:40:03AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Kenneth Marshall put forth on 1/22/2010 8:39 AM:
pdns-recursor 3.1.7.2 is easy to configure/use and has a tuneable
resource footprint.
Got her installed, configured, up and running. Let's see if this improves
this
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
Aliases look like this
majordomo: |/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo
This script will run as nobody unless a non-root user owns the
aliases.db file from which this alias is read.
All tutorials on integrating list
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:51:54AM -0800, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Does anyone have a simple guide to setup Postfix to send e-mail? Just
from the local system to one external e-mail address.
I want to send an e-mail from BASH upon login to certain accounts.
To submit an email message via a
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:22:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The broken router then throws away the bytes with higher sequence
numbers than 14233.
Workaround: turn off window scaling support on the sender's kernel.
This problem is sufficiently common, that on Linux MTAs I always add:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:48:08PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
I am a proper host with a proper ISP. Yet I do not have a PTR record
for this particular IP. That doesn't make my mail server any LESS valid.
This non-Postfix discussion has soaked up enough postfix-users list
cycles. Please drop
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
I think I prefer a separate daemon that tails postfix log and greps all
to=xxx, relay=xxx info and passes it to the policy daemon. That way the
policy daemon doesn't need to have a big DNS mess to resolve all the
recipient MX ips.
MX
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:14:34AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
But my primary issue is sender validation. I don't see how, currently, to
implement this as a policy daemon without re-writing sender validation into
the policy daemon. I don't see any way, for example, to call another
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:56:46AM +0700, Tr???n Tr???ng T???n wrote:
Do you have any way to check domain of email and IP of sending host before
relay it? I'm trying to setup a gateway which accept relay for some IP
address, and make sure this IP can only send email from domain(s) it owned.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:38:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
According to discussions on the Postfix list there is a legitimate
need for such functionality. Until now this requires one Postfix
instance per source IP address.
I am not entirely convinced the need is legitimate, as this
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 06:14:45PM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote:
The pre-active delay is measured from the time message is created until
it enters the active queue (in this case for the first time). So the
message was either:
- Not yet fully formed (delayed EOF in the
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 05:34:16PM +0100, Lanfeust troy wrote:
Jan 15 17:23:00 auth postfix/smtpd[17540]: warning: SASL authentication
failure: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more
information (Configuration file does not specify default realm)
The default
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:44:11PM -0500, Joe Postfix wrote:
Hi, we're trying to setup our Postfix relays to BCC emails to/from specific
users (members of an LDAP group - A/D actually) to a mailbox that logs their
correspondence. I wasnt able to find any mention of this in the online
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:07:34PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* K??rlis Repsons karlis.reps...@gmail.com:
According to RFC 5322:
from= From: mailbox-list CRLF
mailbox-list= (mailbox *(, mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
Thus, one From: header may
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:39:11AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
Perhaps with an SRS milter, or similar content filter, assuming these
take extreme caution to avoid loops (never rewrite to a non empty
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:35:19AM -0600, Wendigo Thompson wrote:
Postfix accepts mail from the
corporate mail server and delivers the message via a pipe alias to an
application that is then inserting the message into the database.
Your choice of delivery mechanism is unfortunate. It is far
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:54:38PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
If anything decides prematurely that the connection is dead, it
is your operating system kernel not Postfix.
Unless of course postfix has a bug (heaven forbid).
I would like to suggest to the rest of the community on this list
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:44:05PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Is postscreen supposed to always run with stress=yes?
Seems to me stress-adaptive behavior would be useful in postscreen.
postfix 20637 0.0 0.1 3028 1704 ?? Ss1:32PM 0:00.01 postscreen
-l -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress=yes
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
What I want to do is rewrite the envelope sender such that it appears to
come from the left hand side of the alias map file, so a mail from
b...@gmail.com to f...@example.com would turn into a mail from
f...@example.com to
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:27:43AM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
Yes we don't like it, but it's easy for postfix to accept and deal with it.
You write the code, deploy it on your systems, and suffer the consequences.
I'll post my actual problem in another thread, to keep this one focused
on the
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 12, 2010 12:24:20 PM -0500 Frank Cusack fcus...@fcusack.com
wrote:
Apparently it only honors the first PTR record that getnameinfo()
returns to it. Additionally this appears to be a conscious decision
and in part
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:12:52PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
I can't accept mail from hosts with multiple PTR records without manually
whitelisting them. Additionally, I can't even tell that I'm experiencing
a failure until it is reported to me manually and out of band.
Don't use
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:39:16AM -0800, Aaron Clausen wrote:
Are challenge response systems still heavily frowned on?
Yes. This is how I explain spam filtering of C/R requests to
my users:
The attached message was reported by you as a quarantine error.
Sadly, challenge/response
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:47:57PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
Don't use reject_unknown_client_hostname indiscriminantly. Do so only
for CIDR blocks in which you find a small number of legitimate MTAs in a
larger pool of spam sending hosts without valid PTR records.
In my case, I don't have
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:36:42AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
According to the example in
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_tls_policy
the policy table should contain
somedomain.tld encrypt
To include subdomains of somedomain.tld also include
.somedomain.tld encrypt
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:24:25PM +0200, Patrick Chemla wrote:
When I do telnet a139.localpc2105.com 25, I get immediate response.
What does response mean? Immediate connection completion means
nothing. Do you get a 220 banner right away? Do you get all of
it or just the first line in a
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:04:13AM -0600, Wendigo Thompson wrote:
Answering your first question, the message in question does show up in find:
26701170 872 -rwx--1 _postfix wheel 444689 Aug 4
2008 /var/spool/postfix/maildrop/F423E1976D72
Is this larger than your message
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:43:55PM +0200, Patrick Chemla wrote:
CPU is more than 85% idle on my postfix I5/750 box, but the outbound queue
is very very slow.
Throughput == Concurrency / Latency
What destination are most of the messages in the queue going to?
What is the associated
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Patrick Chemla wrote:
Here the logs:
This is just the qmgr(8) warnings about a clogged queue. Other than
telling us that all the mail is going to localpc2105.com, this
is not very useful. Where are the logs from smtp(8)?
What transport is
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:59:45PM -0600, Wendigo Thompson wrote:
To answer Victor, message_size_limit is so.
This if far from a complete sentence. What is your current message size
limit? What are the sizes of the stuck messages? What logging is
generated by pickup (and cleanup) when pickup
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:25:01PM -0600, Wendigo Thompson wrote:
Woops, I meant to say: message_size_limit is zero.
I went all verbose and looking at pickup logs for the specific queue
ID I mentioned earlier:
Jan 7 13:16:20 se001 postfix/pickup[57270]: warning: C9EBD24E12F23:
message has
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:08:12PM -0600, Wendigo Thompson wrote:
Whoooah a lot of output from dtruss (I can't even pipe it to a file)
It writes to standard error, so you incant: dtruss ... 2file.
so I'm not sure what you want me to do with that. The output from
postcat is (its a little
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:47:14PM -0500, Stefan Caunter wrote:
I have to inject 2 to 4 millions emails to the postfix box in 24 hours, and
I expect to deliver within the same delay.
Actually, I can't deliver more than 500,000 per 24h hours.
It could be viewed that half a million
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:54:15PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
It could be viewed that half a million delivered in 24 hours is fine.
Are you signing the mail? This can help with delivery rates to the
large webmailer mx destinations.
There are many things to consider:
* DKIM signing
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:30:34AM +0200, Patrick Chemla wrote:
Jan 7 22:02:57 postfix postfix/qmgr[26441]: 5B91F873F6: removed
Jan 7 22:02:57 postfix postfix/smtp[27180]: 375DDD5923:
to=lexoti...@gmail.com, relay=a139.localpc2105.com[10.0.0.139]:25,
conn_use=59, delay=61550,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:00:37AM -0500, Dennis Putnam wrote:
I am using CACert as my signing authority. I have included their root
certificate in my main.cf:
smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/postfix/ssl/root.crt
This is for verifying client certificates when clients connect
to your SMTP server.
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:41:18PM +1300, Michael wrote:
I have not been able to get any message other then Client did not present a
certificate in message headers despite loading a Commodo email certificate
in to Kmail.
What problem are you trying to solve? Does the Kmail client support
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 03:41:56PM +0800, Jeff Huang wrote:
I want to restrict the smtpd with
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch when the sasl login name and
the sender mismatch.
So I need to set a lookup tables for the smtpd_sender_login_maps.
But I only want to check if the
1201 - 1300 of 2372 matches
Mail list logo
