Am 10.05.2013 08:26, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 5/9/2013 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2013 16:44, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Normally I'd avoid arguing with your Reindl as it simply
clutters the list
keep this bullshit for you
Nice etiquette...
and what was your quoted line clown
Am 10.05.2013 08:26, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
nobody expect that if he make mistakes in his DNS configs and is too
lazy to verify what he configured that others configure their servers
to help him
Again you miss the point. The reason for a 4xx here is so the mail gets
queued and can simply
Am 09.05.2013 12:24, schrieb Héctor Moreno Blanco:
I would like to reject an email if the MX does not exist. We have enable the
setting /reject_unknown_sender_domain/
and /reject_unknown_recipient_domain/. However, if the domain has DNS and
resolves it, the message is sent, and we
don’t
Am 09.05.2013 14:14, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 5/9/2013 5:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2013 12:24, schrieb Héctor Moreno Blanco:
I would like to reject an email if the MX does not exist. We have enable
the setting /reject_unknown_sender_domain/
and /reject_unknown_recipient_domain
Am 09.05.2013 16:44, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Normally I'd avoid arguing with your Reindl as it simply
clutters the list
keep this bullshit for you
On 5/9/2013 7:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
if you have a A-record for example.com and you incoming
mail-server is on this IP you do not need
Am 07.05.2013 03:05, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
There's no mail exchanger here. The machine in question
(carotte.tilapin.org) just sends the mail.
and in this case it needs a vaild PTR
Don't try to run a mail exchanger on a dynamic IP address or one
lacking FCrDNS. It's definitely his fault
Am 07.05.2013 10:40, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2013-05-07 10:18:21 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.05.2013 03:05, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
There's no mail exchanger here. The machine in question
(carotte.tilapin.org) just sends the mail.
and in this case it needs a vaild PTR
Perhaps
Am 07.05.2013 14:02, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2013-05-07 10:54:06 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is common practice to not accept mails from hosts without a
valid PTR
A PTR is not associated with a host, but with an IP address. That's
important because mail may be sent from different
Hi
i would like a grep of all records from the previous
day with NOQUEUE in a bash script - how do i get
exactly the format like below from /var/log/maillog
and yesterday?
May 7 12:29:39 mail postfix/smtpd[29696]: NOQUEUE
final goal:
add the output at the bottom a my daily logwatch
, às 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net escreveu:
Hi
i would like a grep of all records from the previous
day with NOQUEUE in a bash script - how do i get
exactly the format like below from /var/log/maillog
and yesterday?
May 7 12:29:39 mail postfix/smtpd[29696]: NOQUEUE
final
Am 07.05.2013 16:20, schrieb Martin Schütte:
On 05/07/2013 04:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
exactly the format like below from /var/log/maillog and yesterday?
With GNU date:
fgrep -e `date -d yesterday +'%b %e'` /var/log/mail.log | fgrep NOQUEUE
perfect - thank you very much
Am 08.05.2013 01:41, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2013-05-07 17:36:49 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
I'm going to take this chance to pipe into this thread that I am
confused about Vincent's issue. He says that the client which lacked
PTR (the one run by a Debianista) was not a mail exchanger, or
Am 08.05.2013 01:47, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2013-05-07 14:19:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.05.2013 14:02, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
depending on the recipient or other factors. And it seems that
some users forget to set up a PTR for all their IPv6 addresses.
This apparently
Am 08.05.2013 01:58, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
BTW, if I understand correctly what has been said earlier, DEFER would
be better than REJECT as the reverse_client_name==unknown error may be
temporary
RTFM
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
The reply
Am 08.05.2013 02:09, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
While I agree that a PTR should be set, this is different. A MTA
sending legitimate mail (not spam) but without a PTR doesn't cause
any damage
and because machines does not guess and smell if it is legitimate
there are rules which are enforced
Am 06.05.2013 23:13, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
Being a Debian developer carries zero weight here.
I just meant that
* his mail config is probably sane (the fact that the IP doesn't
have a rDNS is not his fault, but the ISP's)
no, it's clearly his fault
how should the ISP smell which
Am 03.05.2013 17:51, schrieb Phibee Network Operation Center:
we have installed today Postfix and we have a small problems with bounce.
All email genered by Postfix, for Mailbox Unknow sample, put a blank from:
May 3 15:01:27 smtp-1 postfix/qmgr[9482]: EDA7D281D2: from=, size=5511,
Am 02.05.2013 14:08, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-01 6:31 PM, Ben WIlliams benwilli...@joobworld.com wrote:
The version is postfix 2.3.3.
Really? 7 yrs old, unsupported since the last patch (2.3.19) in 2009...
stoneold yes, but unsupported not really
[root@vmware-recovery:~]$ rpm
Am 02.05.2013 21:16, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-02 9:15 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.05.2013 14:08, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-01 6:31 PM, Ben WIlliamsbenwilli...@joobworld.com wrote:
The version is postfix 2.3.3.
Really? 7 yrs old, unsupported
Am 02.05.2013 21:30, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-02 3:24 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.05.2013 21:16, schrieb Charles Marcus:
Unsupported according to the postfix site..
says who?
Wietse?
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Am 03.05.2013 00:40, schrieb Noel Jones:
Postfix transport features are global to each instance, and are
non-conditional. If you're using sender dependent transports, you're
going to have a hard time without multiple instances
not if you are firm with mysql-tables and queries
Hi
i have on all machines enable_long_queue_ids = yes and one of them is
producing
the old queue-id's daily by pickup via logwatch and interesting is that there
exists a 1:1 clone (put one of the RAID1 disks into the same hardware
and change only the machine-name) without this behavior
Am 30.04.2013 16:02, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
i have on all machines enable_long_queue_ids = yes and one of them is
producing
the old queue-id's daily by pickup via logwatch and interesting is that there
exists a 1:1 clone (put
Am 30.04.2013 16:33, schrieb Pau Amma:
On Tue, April 30, 2013 2:17 pm, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.04.2013 16:02, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Apr 29 02:33:03 localhost postfix/cleanup[8012]: 36CA45F1B2:
message-id
Am 30.04.2013 21:20, schrieb Larry Stone:
FWIW, I consider Lion (10.7) to be the last version of OS X for which the
Apple provided Postfix is usable. For
Mountain Lion (10.8), they changed a lot of the default directories but also
removed amavisd-new (compatability
through OS upgrades
Am 29.04.2013 01:52, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 4/28/2013 9:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.04.2013 14:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Reindl Harald:
454: smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, defer_unauth_destination
554: smtpd_relay_restrictions
Am 29.04.2013 06:10, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 4/28/2013 7:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
There is an important difference, which is why the defer variant
is used as a safety net, and the use-case is precisely when the
client is an MTA.
Apparently I didn't make my point clear, which is
Hi
should this not be a permanent error instead temporary?
in fact some spammer tried for open relay
Apr 28 00:32:49 mail postfix/smtpd[25333]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[221.5.24.12]: 454 4.7.1
acylea2...@yahoo.com.tw: Relay access denied; from=ver...@googlegroups.com
Am 28.04.2013 11:47, schrieb Reindl Harald:
should this not be a permanent error instead temporary?
in fact some spammer tried for open relay
Apr 28 00:32:49 mail postfix/smtpd[25333]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[221.5.24.12]: 454 4.7.1
acylea2...@yahoo.com.tw: Relay access denied
Am 28.04.2013 14:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Reindl Harald:
454: smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, defer_unauth_destination
554: smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination
was the default
Am 27.04.2013 04:32, schrieb grarpamp:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
pff and you realized that the not a file per message is
exactly the solution for problems with tens thousands of
It is *a* solution, not
Am 27.04.2013 23:03, schrieb grarpamp:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
it is what you want
No, actually right up there is what I was surveying.
But you failed to grok that in your search for more pfft.
I'm sure
Am 26.04.2013 21:24, schrieb grarpamp:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
alternate you may use mdbox
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Both of these hold all messages in a single directory.
So sdbox
Am 24.04.2013 15:22, schrieb Nicolas HAHN:
As you wrote, here below is a set of log lines during the issue. The emails
staying in the growing active queue are
the bounce messages (we intercept them to send a copy to postmaster):
[root@iccpfxor04 postfix]# grep 6B34360BAA /var/log/maillog
Am 24.04.2013 19:45, schrieb Nicolas HAHN:
The archietcture is not a good excuse for me, I'm sorry. As a coder
well, that's the difference between coder and delevoper
a coder writes something which works for now and every
few years all is thrown away because the architecture
and
Am 23.04.2013 16:40, schrieb Abhijeet Rastogi:
How flexible is postfix-2.8.7 to add one more log line in logs.
My requirement is to have a line which will contain queueid, form,
to subject header in the same log line
the problem is that the specific lines are from different processes
and
Am 19.04.2013 10:44, schrieb Ram:
I have a requirement of 2 different users using the same sender email address
I found a very old patch for doing this in postfix.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.devel/4
Is this patch still the only way of doing multiple owners
why does
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
cards are allowed but it appears they are not
no and wildchars in case of mail are generally a bad idea
If
Am 17.04.2013 14:46, schrieb Pol Hallen:
Almost configured postfix on my lan, I can't discover how bounce mail
when the size attachments is too big to destination server.
i.e. I send an email with attachments 30Mb to @yahoo.it, @tiscali.it
by mailq I see the error: destination server
Am 15.04.2013 13:57, schrieb Joan Moreau:
Le 15/04/2013 10:24, Charles Marcus a écrit :
Roll back to the previous kernel.
Seriously. If you updated the kernel but didn't keep the last known
good/working one, then hopefully you have learned why doing this is such
a good idea and will do so
Am 15.04.2013 14:14, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
Besides, aren't the odd kernel versions such as 3.5.x, 3.7.x etc. development
kernels?
why should they?
since kernel 2.6 released around 10 years ago the versioning is no longer this
way
and 3.0.x is only a renumbering from 2.6.40
Am 15.04.2013 14:24, schrieb Jan P. Kessler:
Hi,
sorry, I know this is not directly related to postfix but I know that
there are several very experienced people reading this list. My question
is how you (the people that use and administer mailservers) handle the
localpart case sensivity
Am 14.04.2013 17:57, schrieb Joan Moreau:
Le 14/04/2013 15:25, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:30:53PM +, Joan Moreau wrote:
[ You're using a mail client, whose plain-text response does not properly
quote material you're replying to. When posting to this list
Am 14.04.2013 19:24, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
-UHAS_IPV6 -DUSE_TLS -I/usr/include/mysql/ -I/usr/include/sasl '
'AUXLIBS=-L/usr/lib/mysql/ -lmysqlclient -lssl
-lcrypto -lz -lm -lpcre -lsasl2'
i am missing here the path
Am 15.04.2013 00:30, schrieb Joan Moreau:
Le 14/04/2013 22:24, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:21:58PM +, Joan Moreau wrote:
However, how can postfix NOT use the only openssl library ? or fail to have
SHA2 when loading the .so ?
Find a less broken operating
Am 13.04.2013 12:43, schrieb Joan Moreau:
This lead to a error 404.
Maybe can you rather explain how toppost would solve the SSL problem?
you should post your reply BELOW the quote to make a thread
readable by people which may come later to it and they may
ignore it if it is unreadable for
Am 13.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Russell Jones:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity
check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup
is sane with the new smtpd_relay_restrictions? Thanks :-)
if your setup was safe before it is now also and with the
Am 13.04.2013 21:42, schrieb b...@bitrate.net:
On Apr 13, 2013, at 15.33, Russell Jones russ...@jonesmail.me wrote:
Hi all,
Upgrading mail server from Postfix 2.9 to 2.10. Could I get a quick sanity
check to ensure my (fairly simple) setup is sane with the new
Am 13.04.2013 22:36, schrieb b...@bitrate.net:
fine - in the real life you start not from scratch
in the real world, both [and more] things happen.
and another in the subject is a clear sign
have fun calling hundrets and thousands of users especially with broken
clients like a iPhone and
Am 12.04.2013 16:52, schrieb /dev/rob0:
I believe that DNS-based whitelisting will grow in importance,
especially in the IPv6 world. I expect to move into IPv6 with a
default-deny policy, where non-whitelisted hosts are rejected
how do you imagine this working?
in this case it would be
Am 11.04.2013 18:55, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
smtp_header_checks are performed on outgoing mail during smtp(5)
delivery.
is submission not using smtp_header_checks?
has your submission service smtp or smtpd in master.cf?
mine has smtpd as all other working ones out there
signature.asc
Am 11.04.2013 19:20, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 11.04.2013 18:55, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
smtp_header_checks are performed on outgoing mail during smtp(5)
delivery.
is submission not using smtp_header_checks?
has your submission service smtp or smtpd in master.cf?
mine has smtpd
Am 12.04.2013 00:04, schrieb LuKreme:
On Apr 8, 2013, at 13:26, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
The clue is that there should be no permit_ rules before /or/ after
permit_sasl_authenticated, and the last rule should be an explicit reject.
Quick question on this, not ever a permit
Am 12.04.2013 00:35, schrieb LuKreme:
# ldd /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd
/usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd:
libmysqlclient.so.16 = /usr/local/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16
(0x280cf000)
libz.so.3 = /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28139000)
libm.so.4 = /lib/libm.so.4
do NOT top-post please!
Am 10.04.2013 14:32, schrieb Indiana Jones:
Thank you, but I don't have file /postfix/virtual
What should I do?
so what - create it?
Quoting *Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org mailto:wie...@porcupine.org*:
Indiana Jones:
How can I forward all e-mail
Am 08.04.2013 21:08, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Isn't this a class of problem that can be fairly easily solved using
virtual machines? Dedicate a VM and Postfix per customer, without
needing to hack up the MTA. If the issue is queue fairness then one
virtual machine per customer should address
}/man1/*
%attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man5/*
%attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man8/*
%changelog
* Fri Feb 1 2013 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
- remove all the alternatives crap - we only use postfix
* Mon Jan 28 2013 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
- remove distribution configs
Am 06.04.2013 20:25, schrieb ixlo...@sent.at:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you not build a package based on your distros one?
Because
(1) I'm no longer intersted in someone's 'downstream idea' of what
version and how I should configure, build use
Am 06.04.2013 21:22, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
(1) I'm no longer intersted in someone's 'downstream idea' of what
version and how I should configure, build use postfix
what exactly did you not understand in based
Am 06.04.2013 21:22, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
Since the OP is installing into /usr/local, a non-packaged version
is fine. I would go further and install into:
/usr/local/postfix/${version}/{etc,sbin,libexec,man,html}/
with sendmail, mailq and newaliases in
Am 05.04.2013 16:46, schrieb Peter L. Berghold:
Gettting very frustrated with trying to set up TLS using a StartSSL (StartCom)
cert.
Here are the applicable lines (sanitized of course) I used to set this
up:
smtpd_use_tls = yes
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
Am 05.04.2013 17:13, schrieb Peter L. Berghold:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:58:14PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
we don't know because you refused to provide output of
postconf -n
as you wish:
well, and this remains from your ACTIVE config
do you notice the smtpd_use_tls = no?
[harry@srv
Am 05.04.2013 17:23, schrieb Peter L. Berghold:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:19:36PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, and this remains from your ACTIVE config
do you notice the smtpd_use_tls = no?
Yes. I turned it off for now while I seek out advise as to why it is not
working for now
Am 04.04.2013 20:35, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-04-01 10:21 AM, Kajetan Dolinar dolinar.kaje...@gmail.com wrote:
By a detailed and systematic search into my main.cf http://main.cf, I have
found out that I had a stale
alias_maps setting somewhere in the bushes amidst the comments and
Am 01.04.2013 16:59, schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
i have been working on Postfix dovecot etc for couple of months and suddenly
my my management ask the question that
they want to sync mobile device calendar along with i map. i am sure about
IMAP i can implement this with no issues
but
Am 30.03.2013 12:10, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
I'm trying to set up smtp_sender_dependent_authentication and am having
trouble. Here are the relevant main.cf directives:
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
do NOT top-post
Am 30.03.2013 16:34, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
On 3/30/2013 7:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.03.2013 12:10, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
I'm trying to set up smtp_sender_dependent_authentication and am having
trouble. Here are the relevant main.cf directives
Am 30.03.2013 16:42, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
On 3/30/2013 11:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
do NOT top-post
Am 30.03.2013 16:34, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
On 3/30/2013 7:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.03.2013 12:10, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
I'm trying to set up
Am 30.03.2013 16:54, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
On 3/30/2013 11:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
please try to understand that nobody can answer your questions
without any useful information!
* why should debug_level indicate a authentication failure?
* what sort of typo
provide a valid example
Am 30.03.2013 16:52, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
I think I have everything set up correctly now but when I send a message
from the sender in question, something is hanging and there is no debug
output in the log. Here are the running processes:
root 6353 0.0 0.2 12488 2444 ?Ss
://ffmpeg.org/contact.html
and look at this message to understand the problem
* you write a message
* you become a answer at bottom
* you answer on top
how do you imagine that anybody can follow the thread?
On 3/30/2013 11:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.03.2013 16:54, schrieb Dennis Putnam
Am 30.03.2013 19:28, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
On 3/30/2013 2:07 PM, Gerald Vogt wrote:
Sorry, but maybe you should not try to configure a mail server/relay for
the internet if you have trouble understanding this simple error
message. It seems a very bad idea to run an internet server if you
Am 30.03.2013 23:30, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
so come back with output of postconf -n and the both config
files for smtp_sender_dependent_authentication replaced only
the username and passwort or read manuals and solve your
troubles at your own
Sorry but I wanted to try to figure this out on
Am 31.03.2013 00:13, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
On 3/30/2013 6:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sasl_passwd
[in.mailjet.com]
21a8f6casdasdasdadad850539efca7:ea330afe99asdasdasdasdasdfbbd3fd69
sender_relay
myu...@mydomain.com[in.mailjet.com]:587
P.S. There is not a socket
Am 29.03.2013 13:16, schrieb sulli...@indra.com:
I'm trying to set up a simple email relay host, with my home
linux box sending to smtp.indra.com.
I'm running Postfix 2.9.6-1~12.1 on Xubuntu 3.5.0.26,
and I need to use SSL to talk to indra.
I think SSL works on port 465 because I can use
Am 26.03.2013 09:44, schrieb Marko Weber|ZBF:
Mar 25 14:04:35 mail postfix/smtpd[31103]: Untrusted TLS connection
established from
loninmrp15.uk.db.com[160.83.44.131]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
(256/256 bits)
why is on incoming mails the TLS connection untrusted?
Am 26.03.2013 10:53, schrieb Marko Weber|ZBF:
Am 2013-03-26 10:30, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 26.03.2013 09:44, schrieb Marko Weber|ZBF:
Mar 25 14:04:35 mail postfix/smtpd[31103]: Untrusted TLS connection
established from
loninmrp15.uk.db.com[160.83.44.131]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA
Am 26.03.2013 19:36, schrieb Lima Union:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
A common mistake is to turn on chroot operation in the master.cf
file without going through all the necessary steps to set up a
chroot environment. This causes Postfix daemon
Am 27.03.2013 00:03, schrieb craig.post...@noboost.org:
Product:
postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64
We used to use the old vacation package for ages
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vacation/. However since moving to
virtual domains, I've had to move away from this product (as virtual
Am 20.03.2013 12:12, schrieb Ashok Kumar J:
I want to migrate from Microsoft Exchange Server to Postfix mail server.
please give your valuable suggestion.
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
and postfix is only a MTA
so you need dovecot or whatever for IMAP/POP3 too
sorry, a
Hi
smtpd_recipient_limit = 100
anvil_rate_time_unit = 1800s
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 80
some minutes ago a user sent out 1500 messages
i see more than one SASL auth per second, none
of the settings above are stopping this and so i
assume that outlook is using the same connection
but
Am 20.03.2013 17:17, schrieb Ron Rondis:
I'm trying to configure Postfix in a way that it will block post from remote
clients to local (system) users of the
mail server.
In my current configuration I set local_transport = error:local delivery is
disabled but I don't like it. Is
there
Am 20.03.2013 17:33, schrieb Wietse Venema: Reindl Harald:
smtpd_recipient_limit = 100
anvil_rate_time_unit = 1800s
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 80
Have you considered:
smtpd_client_message_rate_limit
smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit
thank you - no i have not because i still
Am 19.03.2013 18:47, schrieb Matteo Marescotti:
250 DSN
mail from:mares...@sdf.org
250 2.1.0 Ok
rcpt to:mares...@sdf.org
554 5.7.1 host[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: Client host rejected: Access denied
because user authentication is now required. I simply wondered why the client
is rejected after
Am 20.03.2013 00:26, schrieb Wietse Venema:
John Levine:
RFC 5321 says that if a mail server gives an initial banner with a 554
status code, that means no mail server here, so the client should do
whatever it normally does on a connection failure, looking for another
MX at equal or lower
Am 20.03.2013 00:54, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Reindl Harald:
I don't think that Postfix has ever distinguished between 5xx codes
at this protocol stage. The documentation says:
smtp_skip_5xx_greeting (default: yes)
Skip remote SMTP servers that greet with a 5XX status code
Am 16.03.2013 20:51, schrieb patrick.proniew...@free.fr:
main.cf reads:
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock
inet:127.0.0.1:8891
non_smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891
that is only a snippet and statet in the welcome
message post output of postconf -n
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
Sieve can't call
Am 14.03.2013 21:04, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
On 2013-03-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For
relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot
and Sieve. From what I can
Am 14.03.2013 21:31, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Reindl Harald wrote:
usually sieve comes AFTER SpamAssassin because it is a broken
setup using a POST queue filter because it results in become
a backscatter and you are usually not permitted by law
accept a message with 250 OK and drop it silent
Am 14.03.2013 21:47, schrieb The Doctor:
I want to avoid perl-ware like amavisd and MailScanner
Any recommendations for a milter that would drop high spam?
i would filter spam ALWAYS with a dedicated spam-firewall
appliance in front of the postfix server acting as MX
signature.asc
Am 13.03.2013 20:45, schrieb Archangel:
here's the output of the grep command on mail.log:
Mar 12 17:13:01 mediaserver postfix/smtpd[12785]: error: open database
/etc/postfix/filtered_domains.db: No such
file or directory
Mar 12 17:13:01 mediaserver postfix/smtpd[12785]: connect from
Am 12.03.2013 08:21, schrieb Erwan David:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:33:43AM CET, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org said:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:28:11PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Either it has become very quiet here, or something has broken.
Nah, it's just that the 2.10.0
Am 12.03.2013 15:16, schrieb Jerry:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:46:14 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
andr...@cymail.eu:
I would like to make a suggestion regarding the Postfix lists to
adopt a labelling for each message subject such that the subject
begins with the fingerprint
Am 12.03.2013 01:33, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:28:11PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Either it has become very quiet here, or something has broken.
Nah, it's just that the 2.10.0 release is perfect and nobody has
any questions anymore. :-)
runs absolutely fine
Am 09.03.2013 23:41, schrieb Alex:
Hi,
I have a postfix-2.9.5 install on fc16 which manages mail for a few
domains. The server just relays mail for a few domains and doesn't
deliver any mail locally.
The question I have is regarding precedence. Is the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
Am 07.03.2013 21:01, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 3/7/2013 1:37 PM, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
Hi people,
Simple question:
Is safe use mysql to get the transport maps information? if the
connection with database drops ? is there cache?
BR,
Junix
The transport table is a critical table
DO NOT POST HTML-MESSAGES
Am 07.03.2013 21:17, schrieb Alfredo Saldanha:
In line...
On 3/7/2013 1:37 PM, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
Hi people,
Simple question:
Is safe use mysql to get the transport maps information? if the
connection with database drops ? is there cache?
BR,
Junix
Am 06.03.2013 11:08, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
I had a postfix 2.9.4 and upgraded to 2.10.0 (on CentOS 6.3 x86_64), building
an RPM using Simon J. Mudd's SRPM
(for v2.9.x). During installation, I got:
warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf created as /etc/postfix/main.cf.rpmnew
warning:
Am 06.03.2013 17:17, schrieb Alvaro Marin:
Hello,
I've several Postfix servers configured to relay email for users/domains.
We've different LDAP servers to query and a cdb file; something like this:
relay_recipient_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf,
1 - 100 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
