Scott Kitterman schreef op 2013-08-16 21:06:
b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On Aug 16, 2013, at 01.56, Rob Tanner rtan...@linfield.edu wrote:
What is it, besides adding the correct the DNS TXT records
as there is a formal dns rr type for spf defined in rfc4408, you'll of
course want to include
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 12:16:03 Hans Spaans wrote:
Scott Kitterman schreef op 2013-08-16 21:06:
b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On Aug 16, 2013, at 01.56, Rob Tanner rtan...@linfield.edu wrote:
What is it, besides adding the correct the DNS TXT records
as there is a formal dns rr type
On 16.08.2013, at 08:50, Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk wrote:
[DNS]
I tend to simply use v=spf1 mx -all since my setup is simple, but you
can see the entire syntax here http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax
Hmm, I used to have just that configuration in my DNS for more than a year,
but
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:56:53 -0700 skrev Rob Tanner rtan...@linfield.edu:
I've googled around a quite a bit and while I can find lots of
instruction on what I need in order for Postfix to validate incoming
mail, I find nothing about what I need to do to make sure Postfix
does whatever it needs
On 8/16/2013 12:56 AM, Rob Tanner wrote:
I've googled around a quite a bit and while I can find lots of instruction on
what I need in order for Postfix to validate incoming mail, I find nothing
about what I need to do to make sure Postfix does whatever it needs to do to
make sure the MTA
On Aug 16, 2013, at 01.56, Rob Tanner rtan...@linfield.edu wrote:
What is it, besides adding the correct the DNS TXT records
as there is a formal dns rr type for spf defined in rfc4408, you'll of course
want to include that as well.
-ben
b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On Aug 16, 2013, at 01.56, Rob Tanner rtan...@linfield.edu wrote:
What is it, besides adding the correct the DNS TXT records
as there is a formal dns rr type for spf defined in rfc4408, you'll of
course want to include that as well.
I wouldn't bother. It has only very
On Aug 16, 2013, at 15.06, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote:
I wouldn't bother. It has only very limited deployment and is proposed for
removal in the revision to RFC 4408 that is about to enter IETF last call.
interesting. thank you for calling attention to this.
-ben
I've googled around a quite a bit and while I can find lots of instruction on
what I need in order for Postfix to validate incoming mail, I find nothing
about what I need to do to make sure Postfix does whatever it needs to do to
make sure the MTA receiving the mail validates it. And the
