Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-12 Thread Buzai Andras
Any update on this? Thank you, Buzai On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Buzai Andras buzai.and...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Reindl Harald: To your querstion about superuser: NERVER EVER build sources as superuser necause if

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Buzai Andras buzai.and...@gmail.com: Sorry if my question may seem a stupid one but what do you mean by: unprivileged (but trusted) user? A user without root-privileges I created a user named build with home directory set to: /home/build and I compile the sources with this user inside

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-11 Thread Buzai Andras
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Reindl Harald: To your querstion about superuser: NERVER EVER build sources as superuser necause if there are bugs in the build-process you can damage you system which is impossible with restricted permissions. As

Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Buzai Andras
Hi, I want to install Postfix 2.7.2 by compiling it from sources. In the INSTALL file I saw the following statement: In the instructions below, a command written as # command should be executed as the superuser. A command written as % command should be executed as an

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread edacval
On 01/10/2011 11:06 AM, Buzai Andras wrote: Hi, Hi I want to install Postfix 2.7.2 by compiling it from sources. In the INSTALL file I saw the following statement: In the instructions below, a command written as # command should be executed as the superuser. A

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Buzai Andras
Hi, I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the latest Postfix release. Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can always learn something new. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:43 AM, John Adams mailingli...@belfin.ch wrote: Am 10.01.2011 10:06,

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Buzai Andras
Is there any security risk if I configure/compile all the sources as the superuser? (I am referring only to the build/installation process) Unlikely but possible. Could you please elaborate this a little? Maybe with an example? Thank you, Buzai On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:38 AM,

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.01.2011 11:33, schrieb Buzai Andras: Hi, I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the latest Postfix release. Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can always learn something new. nobody said anything against software packaging

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread John Adams
Am 10.01.2011 13:37, schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 10.01.2011 11:33, schrieb Buzai Andras: Hi, I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the latest Postfix release. Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can always learn something new. nobody

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Reindl Harald: To your querstion about superuser: NERVER EVER build sources as superuser necause if there are bugs in the build-process you can damage you system which is impossible with restricted permissions. As per the Postfix INSTALL instructions, compile as unprivileged (but trusted)

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.01.2011 14:11, schrieb John Adams: As it may take some time to build up software packaging facility where is the problem to take the source-package and try to replace the programsource for a rebuild? On RHEL/Fedora you take the srpm, install it as builduser, put the newer tarball under

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread John Adams
Am 10.01.2011 14:23, schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 10.01.2011 14:11, schrieb John Adams: As it may take some time to build up software packaging facility where is the problem to take the source-package and try to replace the programsource for a rebuild? On RHEL/Fedora you take the srpm,

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.01.2011 14:43, schrieb John Adams: On RHEL/Fedora you take the srpm, install it as builduser, put the newer tarball under SOURCES, edit the SPECFILE and do a rpmbuild -bb postfix.spec, i do this since a long time necause i rebuild all our core-services with optimized gcc-flags I use

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread John Adams
I use Slackware. And he is using Ubuntu the basics still apply. with other words: a system from the 1990's ... which is very up-to-date with it's software, much more than centos or debian. And because I like KISS :) you are not packaging because you do not want, you can not :-)

Re: Question about Postfix Installation

2011-01-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:33:28AM +0100, Buzai Andras wrote: I use Ubuntu 10.04 and the package repository does not contain the latest Postfix release. Ubuntu 10.04 contains 2.7.0[1], Ubuntu 10.10 contains 2.7.1[2]. You n Also I prefer installing packages from source. This way I think I can