Re: smtp restrictions

2013-06-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
James Zee skrev den 2013-05-31 06:43: reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/ -- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/30/2013 11:43 PM, James Zee wrote: I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly appreciative if someone could sanity check my work. Reviewing

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread Mikael Bak
Stan, On 05/31/2013 08:49 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 5/30/2013 11:43 PM, James Zee wrote: I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly appreciative if

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/31/2013 4:09 AM, Mikael Bak wrote: Stan, On 05/31/2013 08:49 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 5/30/2013 11:43 PM, James Zee wrote: I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2013-05-31 6:04 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote: It is a waste of everyone's time including the poster and readers to go spell check main.cf files on the mailing list. Wietse Venema 12/09/2010 Stan, I certainly don't read that as saying people cannot ask for a sanity check

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:43:51AM -0400, James Zee wrote: I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly appreciative if someone could sanity check my

List rules (was: smtp restrictions)

2013-05-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: What I stated above is Wietse's policy: It is a waste of everyone's time including the poster and readers to go spell check main.cf files on the mailing list. To place the quote in context: Stan: This is exactly why I wanted to see your main.cf. It's a total mess. I'll

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread James Zee
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:09 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:43:51AM -0400, James Zee wrote: I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-31 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:15:05AM -0400, James Zee wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:09 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:43:51AM -0400, James Zee wrote: snip Also, you really should separate submission from your inbound port 25. I only allow relaying on the

smtp restrictions

2013-05-30 Thread James Zee
I was hoping someone could take a quick glance at my smtpd_*_restrictions configurations. While I've read and (re-)read the SMTPD_ACCESS_README file a few times over I would be greatly appreciative if someone could sanity check my work. The goal is, obviously, to (a) block spammers, (b) only

Re: smtp restrictions

2013-05-30 Thread lists
On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:43:51 -0400 James Zee jamesze...@gmail.com wrote: smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated check_policy_service unix:private/policy-spf reject_unauth_destination check_policy_service must be after