Hi have seen all the readme file explaining install support for individual
feature such as dovecot only or mysql only.
My direct question is give me the command or syntax atleast for bulding the
postfix for all of the supported feature .
Regards,
Kshitij
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Wietse
On 23/6/2011 9:13 πμ, kshitij mali wrote:
Hi have seen all the readme file explaining install support for
individual feature such as dovecot only or mysql only.
My direct question is give me the command or syntax atleast for
bulding the postfix for all of the supported feature .
If you
Thank you very very much Nilolaos , thats what is need
Wietese: why do u keep such readme file which will make postfix easy to
install
Regards,
kshitij
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
On 23/6/2011 9:13 πμ, kshitij mali wrote:
Hi have seen all the
Hi,
We are using Postfix 2.8.3 with Dovecot 2.0.13 on CentOS 5.6.
The problem we have is that sometimes, due to mail sender's error when
composing a message, the sender attempts to send an email to @noa.gr
(without specifying the user part of the address). This results in a
Postfix error due
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Steve stev...@gmx.net wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:28:46 +0200
Von: polloxx poll...@gmail.com
An: postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: FuzzyOCR
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped
On 06/23/2011 02:26 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hi,
We are using Postfix 2.8.3 with Dovecot 2.0.13 on CentOS 5.6.
The problem we have is that sometimes, due to mail sender's error when
composing a message, the sender attempts to send an email to @noa.gr
(without specifying the user part of the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:56:22AM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f
${sender} -d ${user}
Obviously this happens because in this case there is no ${user} data.
It
Mihira Fernando:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
-f ${sender} -d ${user}
Obviously this happens because in this case there is no ${user} data.
That is incorrect. There is always one
Sun Chong:
If you installed Postfix with a non-default install_root parameter,
then you failed to read the instructions. This might be the
reason. (What is the default install_root? /?)
READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. This is the text from the install script:
install_root_prompt=the prefix for
I want to check the destination addresses of e-mail sent by my local
users against one or more trusted blacklists (to reduce the chances
of my local users responding to spam mail, etc.).
But I *don't* want to check my own local domain against blacklists;
I want to skip the blacklist checks (and
Brand new poster here, so please have mercy :)
My organization is in the midst of planning an email migration from Groupwise
to Exchange. What was asked of me was to see if it would be possible to have
an SMTP entry point, that would do the following:
1) Look at the recipient address
2)
Today we're getting an error where a hosting client suddenly cannot send
email via Outlook. The log error is as follows:
IP addresses and usenames are changed to protect the innocent.
Jun 23 10:46:49 orion postfix/smtpd[7653]: 9C96A1B80197:
client=dpc##.direcpc.com[##.##.###.###],
Nice to see you here...
This should point the way for you, as it uses an LDAP script to query
AD, and should be adaptable to do the same kind of query against
Novell.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~malth/gaptuning/postfix/
Kurt
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:02, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov
Thanks, Kurt. Was going to contact you soon, to see if I could look at the
script you were using. I'm just hoping that it's possible to put the logic in,
to check the second structure...
Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com 6/23/2011 10:35 AM
Nice to see you here...
This should point the way for
Hello All,
I searched the all knowing google but wasn't able to find what this 555
really means. Can someone please tell me what this means and if there is
something I can do on my side or if it's only on the receivers side.
Jun 13 12:51:48 pluto postfix/smtp[6897]: D83CF364024:
Am 23.06.2011 19:48, schrieb Jack:
Hello All,
I searched the all knowing google but wasn’t able to find what this 555
really means. Can someone please tell me
what this means and if there is something I can do on my side or if it’s only
on the receivers side.
Jun 13 12:51:48 pluto
Joseph Heaton:
Brand new poster here, so please have mercy :)
My organization is in the midst of planning an email migration from Groupwise
to Exchange. What was asked of me was to see if it would be possible to have
an SMTP entry point, that would do the following:
1) Look at the
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jack
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 11:10 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Error 550
I searched the all knowing google but wasn't able to find what this
Jack:
Am 23.06.2011 19:48, schrieb Jack:
Hello All,
I searched the all knowing google but wasn't able to find what this
555 really means. Can someone please tell me what this means and if
there is
something I can do on my side or if it's only on the receivers side.
Jun 13
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:53 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Error 550
Am 23.06.2011 19:48, schrieb Jack:
Hello All,
I searched the
Am 23.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Jack:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:53 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Error 550
Am 23.06.2011 19:48, schrieb
Hi,
I find it annoying when headers are truncated to remove relay records
because it makes it harder for me to trace various sorts of problems all the
way back so I generally don't do it.
But it's even more annoying when overzealous blacklists like Barracuda toss
email relayed via our server
Am 23.06.2011 22:30, schrieb John Baker:
Hi,
I find it annoying when headers are truncated to remove relay records because
it makes it harder for me to trace
various sorts of problems all the way back so I generally don't do it.
But it's even more annoying when overzealous blacklists
So what is the best practice in postfix for removing headers before they
relay back out into Internet?
Don't.
Aloha mai Nai`a.
--
So this is how Liberty dies ...
To Thunderous Applause.
Il 22/06/2011 16:30, Hannes Erven ha scritto:
..[cut]..
What do you think? Is there already someone using a setup like this
(with which policyd implementation)?
The simpliest idea.. :-)
Setup your backup MX server as a forwarder to the primary (or etrn, or
.. as you like).
Create on this
On 6/23/2011 3:30 PM, John Baker wrote:
Hi,
I find it annoying when headers are truncated to remove relay
records because it makes it harder for me to trace various
sorts of problems all the way back so I generally don't do it.
But it's even more annoying when overzealous blacklists like
26 matches
Mail list logo
