uot;no_milters" parametr is not
passed to pickup daemon this way.
How to configure this so that after the content filter no milters are used
again?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
r_bcc (actually sender_bcc_maps,
to be precise) and don't mess with headers.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ry on :)).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
"localhost" with IP address "127.0.0.1"." So,
OpenDKIM milter sees that the mail comes from "127.0.0.1" and the sender in
"From:" line is from my domain, and signs it.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million ye
configuration file, without milters and configured for a different queue
directory? And then run the after-filter sendmail(1) also configured for
that queue directory?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: onc
r-queue content filter to running it as a milter. Thus there is no
need to invoke sendmail for the second time, and the issue disappears.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, a
Dnia 2.10.2019 o godz. 11:05:31 ratatouille pisze:
>
> Do I really have to whitelist all the IPs of outbound.protection.outlook.com
> in postgrey?
I just put the domain name outbound.protection.outlook.com into
/etc/postgrey/whitelist_clients.local and it works for me.
--
Regards,
spam" on one account fixed the problem for
that account, but didn't have any influence on other accounts. So I'm
stuck, for over a week I was trying everything that I could, and still
nothing changed.
The "solution" I was suggesting here is a heavily flawed workaround - I am
complete
Is it possible to use some script in transport_maps= parameter to check MX
of a domain and return appropriate result?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
it with transport_maps ?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
doesn't like". Even if
this succeeds, there is no guarantee that in the future Google will not go
crazy again and start treating my email as spam.
No, thanks. Trying to configure sending mail via Gmail's server looks like a
much more reasonable alternative compared to this...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
me virtual mailboxes, because
probably a different method of actually inserting message into user's "Sent"
folder will be required in both cases.
I have done it for system users, if it's your case, I can describe it here.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a mi
Dnia 7.11.2019 o godz. 18:09:23 Ignacio GarcĂa pisze:
> I don't know anybody out of the IT world subscribed
> to mailing lists
Probably depends a lot on local conditions, because I know many. There are
very few IT people on non-IT related lists I'm subscribed to.
--
Regards,
Jarosla
anization, a political party, an urban activists' group etc.
massively use mailing lists for intra-organizational communication. Myself
I'm a member of about ten such lists. What you write just simply isn't true.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to s
nt to run spamassassin for outgoing mail too, you should add
unix:spamass/spamass.sock to non_smtpd_milters as well and remove the "-o
smtpd_milters=..." line from aobove master.cf entry.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school,
cause your sending server doesn't have IPv6 routing
:)), it falls back to IPv4.
However, if it connects successfully and gets a reject, it doesn't try again
to the IPv4 address.
I'm by no means an expert, it's just what I have seen in my server's logs.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu
failed authentication, but
also a message from Dovecot authenticator that says the same.
By the way: I'm just curious, what does the string "UGFzc3dvcmQ6" in the
failed authentication message mean? I get it with every such attempt.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"I
have a MX
record, then, by RFC, A or records are checked for "domain". There is
no obligation to have a MX record defined for hostname to have mail
delivered to that address.
Maybe "smtp.antispamcloud.com" simply violates the RFC by rejecting domains
that don't have an MX reco
lients.local manually.
I guess postscreen should also have some whitelist mechanism?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
host. Usually most
software that sends emails can be configured to use pickup instead of SMTP
to localhost, so check if you can reconfigure it so.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy,
bWU6) and
found out that it is logged when username is syntactically incorrect, ie.
contains invalid characters.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
they worked previously at all, as
I never tried to connect to the site via HTTPS.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
t line. He is
trying to replace all these strings by a proper "Re:".
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
m I right?
But in that case probably LDA is the best place to do such change. Some time
ago I was doing something similar via procmail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived
entire netblock or ISP because there are spammers within
this netblock or using this ISP (but there are "good" senders there as
well). Which is something a lot of email providers do, nevertheless.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go
on today?
I don't know of any substantial law change in this aspect. These all seem
just to be individual policies of the mentioned providers.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and s
ublish a SPF record.
Publish a DMARC policy.
=quote end=
So if anybody has deliverability issues with Gmail and refers to that guide,
they tell you you should set up SPF, DKIM and DMARC.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school,
client???
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ervers on the
Internet. We should defend the de-centralized Internet, not help big players
to make it more centralized.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived wit
is header is always signed...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ead of messages
from a mailing list, every each of them having "From:" address as the list's
address? What would you do if you need to quickly find a message written by
a particular person (for example, you) in this conversation?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"
assword reset links) from several websites
(for example from Spotify) that way.
I even tried to contact these services and report the problem, but it
seems that they don't even understand what the problem is.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go
cot's LDA. That needs to
be specially set up in main.cf and/or master.cf.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 18.10.2019 o godz. 08:53:38 Bernardo Reino pisze:
> On 2019-10-17 12:17, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >So you just can't block HTML, because you'll cut yourself off of many
> >important messages that you actually want to receive. (However, I give
> >HTML-only messages without a
henticate to your server as "cy...@mydomain.com" and started to send
mail.
Are you sure your authentication is working OK?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
until next time.
Do you have a webmail on this server? Maybe the webmail is vulnerable and
gets abused?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ould reject all e-mail originating from my country
(.pl) ;)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 22.10.2019 o godz. 15:55:45 Dominic Raferd pisze:
> It must be done before milters so that it can be signed by opendkim
> milter after the header rewrite.
I think it's just enough to do it in the very first milter, isn't it?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"I
th almost nobody noticing it :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
(However, I give
HTML-only messages without a plaintext part quite a large spam score in my
antispam filter).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
-based email client like mutt over a
ssh connection? :)
(however, this reveals your user ID on the server in default configuration,
like in this message - I guess it is possible to remove that header too, but
I never cared)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million ye
orts 468/587 are only for local mail sumission, ie. from client to MTA.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ved-header: unparseable: $line");
! $self->{num_relays_unparseable}++;
! }
}
# undefined or 0 means there's no result, so goto the next header
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna
twice. I'd like to avoid the latter.
Maybe add to recipient_bcc_maps something like
notfo...@example.com throwa...@your-local-domain.com
and then alias "throwaway" in your "aliases" file to /dev/null ?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go
here you suggest it but still gives
> UNPARSEABLE_RELAY. Also, I understand the quotes are essential
> because the line includes spaces?
Try fixing it in SpamAssassin's code, as I wrote. It works perfectly for me.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, wh
check in that
case, not pass?
Looks like they have implemented some sort of RBL under spf.rambler.ru
domain and that entry in the SPF record makes IP addresses that are on that
RBL fail SPF check.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to
I don't know as I don't use DMARC. I only DKIM sign outgoing mail, I don't
verify DKIM nor DMARC on incoming mail. Just try what order works best.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpup
cases, and then suddenly it
turned out that we have quite a problem.
You may disagree of course, but that's just how I see it. There is a quite
old article about why SPF is wrong, but in my opinion this article didn't
date a bit: http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw R
when it's the only item SPF record specifies, ie. the domain
declares it sends no mail at all. And it's the only case when receivers
should strictly respect SPF and outright reject all mail coming from such
domains. In all other cases, if the domain sends *any* mail, that mail can
be forwar
essage I put a link to a web page
where one could whitelist him/herself by submitting their e-mail address via
the page. A legitimate sender would - hopefully - do it and thus be able to
re-send the message. The spammer usually won't, as they don't read rejection
messages, and even if they did, they won't ha
nt or not. And when you learn that it hasn't it may be too late,
because eg. the event you were asking about has already happened.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
=DMARC1;p=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=0"
According to specs, you can't set pct to 0, it must be at least 1.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
rom "aws" to "aws.local" to make it look more like a domain name :).
This time I got the following:
<..@gmail.com>: unable to look up host aws.local: Name or service not
known
What am I doing wrong?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a
Dnia 8.10.2019 o godz. 00:09:34 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze:
> As I have trouble with sending emails to Gmail (I wrote about it in a
> different thread), I try to configure Postfix to send mail to Gmail via a
> different mail server as a relay. However, for reasons too long to explain
> h
found in /etc/hosts, resolve
using normal DNS. And this is the way it's working for me right now.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
Dnia 6.10.2019 o godz. 12:50:27 Bill Cole pisze:
>
> The MailOp list is probably a better choice:
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
I have the very same issue as the OP, thanks for pointing to that list!
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@ra
(it would be logged). It just connects and disconnects. And so on
and on...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
pf examples.
I just completely blocked that IP on iptables.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ith "-o smtpd_milters="
> But I dont have idea - maby I thing wrong ...
Instead of using spamassassin as a content filter, as in your example,
you have to use spamass-milter, it's a Milter interface to spamassassin.
Then you will avoid double DKIM.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@
n my original post,
it was eating up my resources a bit, and there was a noticeable server
slowdown.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ing), networking, memory, ...?
> Is this systemd overhead? I tried to make Postfix "not receiving
> email" as inexpensive as possible. I further reduced that cost by
> adding postscreen.
I did not investigate it very much. Definitely it was not a CPU issue, might
be networking.
--
Re
am I blaming Postfix? I never said anything like this...
I was just curious about this strange type of "attack", that's all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
she is using mail account at such an incompetent provider.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
t isn't available from within
Postfix chroot jail?
Try placing it somewhere inside Postfix chroot jail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
need to
specify path to socket in Postfix configuration taking into account the
chroot jail, ie. not "/var/spool/postfix/postgresql", but just "postgresql".
Alternatively, you can create
/var/spool/postfix/var/spool/postfix/postgresql directory, as Viktor wrote.
--
Regards,
Jaros
Dnia 17.02.2020 o godz. 12:33:54 Bernardo Reino pisze:
> If your DNS resolving is so unreliable, I would suggest not
> rejecting e-mails merely because you can't find/verify the rDNS.
Or reject with 4xx instead of 5xx.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million
rocmail rule that matches only for
old address.
You can also set up an autoresponder using procmail and formail only (there
is an example in "man procmailex"), without a need to use the vacation
program at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when
_mynetworks",
provided that the value of $mynetworks includes the actual IP Amavis is
connecting to.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
; undeliverable and will send something to that address again in the
> future.
Can't you just write a simple script that extracts sender and recipient from
the message in queue, deletes the message and sends an email to the sender
informing that the recipient address is undeliverable?
--
Regards,
MX".
Yes, there are two different things, as I said in my another message.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
I once found an ISP that blocked port 25 completely, even not allowing to
connect to their mail relay (actually, they didn't provide any mail relay at
all to their users, so there was nowhere to connect to). You were forced to
use ports 587 or 465 for outgoing mail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Raf
.g. that look more like "make me important" from the
> manager "from such operators:
> " matter that communication has chosen the unencrypted e-mail
> communication with all its dangers ..."
But what exactly is your question? What do you actually ask? Because
ite a time without any problems. And it
should stay so. Adding artificial MX records that don't have any sense
doesn't look like a reasonable thing to me.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ord to my domain, pointing
> >back to the same name (eg. "rafa.eu.org MX 10 rafa.eu.org")
>
> I've seen recommendation to do this (just for sure) long ago.
Looks strange and superfluous anyway.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ut it's up to the receiving server to decide if it will
accept mail to u...@mxhost.example.com or not, and not to the sending one.
As long as mxhost.example.com has valid A record, mail should be sent out.
Eventually it will bounce.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million ye
nly home router
> have direct access to internet.
> So how to implement this mail sending feature?
Port forwarding on router from internal network to your actual mail server
would be enough.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school
ort level
encryption alone.
Maybe you can try to agree with your senders on using PGP?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
f the files that it includes) should contain a
"to" command specifying the maildir wher the message should be delivered.
Alternatively, that command could be specified in ~/.mailfilter file in each
user's home directory. In absence of such a command, maildrop delivers to
/var/mail/[username]
Mine says:
raj@rafa:~$ host -t mx imake.ro 8.8.8.8
Using domain server:
Name: 8.8.8.8
Address: 8.8.8.8#53
Aliases:
Host imake.ro not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
That's the correct answer - NXDOMAIN, not SERVFAIL.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to
ing that the domain does not exist would be
3(NXDOMAIN). In that case Postfix should return mail immediately.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ication-To: header,
which could be used to determine if the recipienta ctually read my message
or not.
So sending mail to someone at Gmail is actually sending it into the
unknown...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, t
sn't support
that header at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
same user", but at least it's certain that
messages sent to these two addresses are delivered to the same Gmail
account. That's how Gmail works.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
nd they don't,
as they don't know that it's there in the first place), it also increases
chances for your other messages to be classified as spam. So, once you get
into someone's Spam folder - even by mistake - the probability of your next
messages getting there increases automatically.
-
t.
How else would you distinguish between eg. something.ibm.com and
something.co.uk ? :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
That's not only my experience, but many people here and there on the Net (on
this list as well) complain about that behaviour.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
here are virtually no confirmed
informations about how Google's anti-spam filter behaves) that Google is
more likely to classify email from small senders as spam if they are sent
via IPv6, and less likely if they are sent via IPv4.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a mill
en delivered. Not silently discarded.
In what area of the world people are still using faxes?
I haven't heard abut anybody using fax (even a lawyer) for years.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpup
ccepting a message and silently discarding it is no different from deleting
a message without even opening it - only the former is automated, but this
automation is authorized by you - it's you who, as the end recipient, set
the rule to discard messages. You are absolutely allowed to do it.
--
Regards
actually got to the recipient, you must use synchronous communication -
face-to-face meeting, telephone, videoconference etc. so that you can
see/hear the actual response of your correspondent in real time.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids
utely necessary. By "necessary" I *don't* mean
"I just want to include fancy formatting in my email". One example of good
use for HTML was already given here - to include inline images in the
message (images that are there to actually explain something, not just to
look nice).
fore (and after) rendering. Markdown is a very good step
> towards this, IMO.
Well, but we need mail clients that support it :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and s
hments
inline images != image attachments
Plaintext email cannot have inline images, but can have image attachments.
HTML email can have both.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hush
ike to ask someone who is active on
this list and definitely isn't "spammified" ;) by Google to resend this
message to the list, so you can actually see it.
Thank you in advance!
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school,
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 08:12:10 @lbutlr pisze:
> On 20 Mar 2020, at 07:34, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > Currently I have an issue (again; the previous one from a few months ago was
> > resolved) with my messages sent to Gmail users - they are put into
> > recipients' Sp
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 11:06:20 Wietse Venema pisze:
> Would it help if the postfix list used "dmarc mitigation" so that
> the From header does not contain your email address:
>
> From: Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-Users
> Reply-To: Jaroslaw Rafa
That probably could h
ment list for the
message, find the HTML part and press ENTER on it to launch web browser and
view the message in browser.
So it's much more effort needed to read HTML-only mail compared to
plaintext.
> I have
> yet to understand this hatred of HTML email.
Is it easier to understand now? :)
--
Regar
s from me as the sender.
Confirmed. Period.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
ail through a smarthost
behind your VPN? If no, is it possible for you to do it?
In that case, you wouldn't have to worry about monitoring your VPN state.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
w
not on general incoming mail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
1 - 100 of 445 matches
Mail list logo