Re: Prioritising outgoing mail

2009-03-02 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:44:21PM +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: Hi list, From me a question that seems to be asked now and then here, but I could not find any answers even on whether this is possible in the first place. I would like to be able to prioritise outgoing e-mail so they do not

Re: Prioritising outgoing mail

2009-03-02 Thread Wouter van Marle
On 2 Mar 09, at 23:09, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:44:21PM +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: Hi list, From me a question that seems to be asked now and then here, but I could not find any answers even on whether this is possible in the first place. I would like to be

Re: Prioritising outgoing mail

2009-03-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Wouter van Marle: On 2 Mar 09, at 23:09, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:44:21PM +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: Hi list, From me a question that seems to be asked now and then here, but I could not find any answers even on whether this is possible in the first

Re: Prioritising outgoing mail

2009-03-02 Thread Wouter van Marle
Hi all, Would it be possible to add an extension to the user's address, e.g. user+s...@example.com, that would be mapped through a separate transport (e.g. the slow: as suggested in the man page), and be rewritten by trivial-rewrite to u...@example.com before being sent out. An option like this

Re: Prioritising outgoing mail

2009-03-02 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:25:55AM +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:18 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:59:31PM +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: Use a custom transport for these messages with a low concurrency limit, You mean like