cheshirekat sez:
[snip personal baggage that has little to nothing to do with anything I
wrote or could possibly have meant by my short response]
I've taken my response to private email, as anyone should do when they
have a personal issue with someone. Talk about rude and mistaking what
Michael Lewis sez:
Of course, if they
really are out to get you, then it is paranoia... :)
Oops. Meant is not paranoia. Left out a word there...
--
Michael Lewis
Off Balance Productions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.offbalance.com
cheshirekat sez:
I think there are others who have the same opinion about email addresses
and public archives of mailing lists. I also think that those who don't
care are the ones who haven't had anything negative arise because of
public mailings lists - or aren't aware of the potential.
I
On Mon, Oct 10, 20054:41 PM, the following words from A-NO-NE Music
[EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ...
It has been interesting I found myself minority on this subject. Most
of the user groups, mainly audio engineers in my case, don't want to
have archive public because
It has been interesting I found myself minority on this subject. Most
of the user groups, mainly audio engineers in my case, don't want to
have archive public because everyone is afraid of getting quoted outside
of the forum, and you have no control over it.
You could make mistake by posting
A-NO-NE Music ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2005-10-07 23:58 said:
Sean McBride / 2005/10/06 / 06:52 PM wrote:
I'm afraid I can't agree... the list is public, isn't it? And public
means, well, public. :)
What is the definition of public here? If the list do not allow non
registered member to post,
6 matches
Mail list logo
