to further fuel the threaded viewing discussion, here is the way
GNUmail graphically supports threading -the only one nicer than MacSOUP:
http://www.collaboration-world.com/gnumail.data/screenshots/v1.2.0pre1/
gnumail-osx.png
I don't know wether it's good or bad for PM because I *didn't* try
computer artwork by subhash said:
I just wanted to tell that not everybody is longing for threading.
OK. That is a valid point of course.
PM 5.1 | OS X 10.3.6 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
computer artwork by subhash said:
grouping messages belonging to each other closer
together? Sounds to me that makes PM *easier* to use.
Not for me. I have no use for this. So it would be an unnecessary feature
*for me* and only causing some bytes more to load when PM starts. But:
That's only
computer artwork by subhash (29/12/04 6:00 pm) said:
grouping messages belonging to each other closer
together? Sounds to me that makes PM *easier* to use.
Not for me. I have no use for this. So it would be an unnecessary feature
*for me* and only causing some bytes more to load when PM starts.
computer artwork by subhash (29/12/04 6:00 pm) said:
grouping messages belonging to each other closer
together? Sounds to me that makes PM *easier* to use.
Not for me. I have no use for this. So it would be an unnecessary feature
*for me* and only causing some bytes more to load when PM starts.
[Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 28.12.2004 um 22:
50 Uhr:]
grouping messages belonging to each other closer
together? Sounds to me that makes PM *easier* to use.
Not for me. I have no use for this. So it would be an unnecessary feature
*for me* and only causing some bytes more to
Tim Lapin on 12/28/04 said
A proper logging of events (including an explanation of the error codes
An explanation of the error codes WOULD be helpful!
--
Barbara Needham
Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another note, I'm fed up with with posters on this list asking
individuals not to ask too much for specific features.
I think I did much more than you did.
Including searching and finding back a post from yourself, while you
didn't even bother to
I want threading, please. If you're on email lists, of course you can
make good use of proper threading (I'm on 30+). For now, I'd be happy for
better removal or ignoring of alternative prefixes and the like, that
makes PM not group these messages together from the start. That is very
bad
I have somewhat the same viewpoint as Wayne B. and some others. At a few
occasions it would be nice but I don't really need it as I sort and read
by date received. Usually that is plenty for me. Those few times I did
wish it was threaded are maybe 10x over the span of several years.
What I
listes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 27/12/04 11:24 am
Well, I just counted all persons reacting to the idea of threading on
this forum for the last 15 months.
I like the idea of having threading in PowerMail. It would be useful on
occasion.
The lack of it isn't a deal breaker though. I shan't
I would too! As a matter of fact, I am already using Mail on my Cube.
--
Mirko Kranenburg
Maastricht, Netherlands
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PowerBook G4 (15 FW-800 1.25 GHz) OS X 10.3.5
PowerMac G4 Cube 450 MHz, OS X 10.3.5, OS 9.2.2
Freeway Pro 3.5.12, NavPack, GraphPack
PowerMail 5.1b3, 3
So would I.
--
Alexander Balakersky
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 15:44:00 -0500, Sean McBride wrote:
Are there really so few of us that want threading?
I'd love it. It's one of the main reasons why I'm considering moving on
from PM...
--
Shane Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 15:44:00 -0500, Sean McBride wrote:
Are there really so few of us that want threading?
I'd love it. It's one of the main reasons why I'm considering moving on
from PM...
--
Shane Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any chance we'll be seeing PM support 'threaded viewing' so that messages
with the same subject (like on mailing lists) are grouped together? I'm
really dying for this, and I understand Mail.app has it
IMHO, its the #1 thing PM needs. Thanks
15 matches
Mail list logo
