Josh,
On 6/7/06, Joshua Uziel wrote:
> So, it's time to think about sending you guys the code. Right now,
> we're going through and cleaning things up a little, doing the legal
> process and whatnot, but what we've got should be in your hands in the
> near future. What I want to talk about is w
Hello,
> So, it's time to think about sending you guys the code. Right now,
> we're going through and cleaning things up a little, doing the legal
> process and whatnot, but what we've got should be in your hands in the
> near future. What I want to talk about is what form you guys want it in
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On 6/7/06, Joshua Uziel wrote:
> First of all that is great - frankly speaking I started to fear we'll never
> see the actual source ;-)
Tsk tsk... ye of little faith... ;)
> As for the form of the code - why don't you just create your own branch
> in svn and work out of it
Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>1) A patch against that same tree. This is quick and trivial to do and
>>will take pretty much no effort. From there, it's just a matter of
>>merging it in and syncing it back into the trunk. It's not against the
>>latest OpenSolaris bits, but merging them together sho
So, it's time to think about sending you guys the code. Right now,
we're going through and cleaning things up a little, doing the legal
process and whatnot, but what we've got should be in your hands in the
near future. What I want to talk about is what form you guys want it in.
We originally
