I've been thinking for some time of writing a paper with the
title "Why can't I see the structure?" based on the idea that
modules in every programming language I know look like blobs.
I'm aware of visual notations like UML, BON, SDL, and what
was it, Visual Erlang? But for me, those are just spa
Hear, hear!
(I don't know what the solution is.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PPIG
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ppig-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this grou
I am not sure if it matters for you but how about Standard ML modules?
- Gergely
On Thursday, 28 April 2016, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> I've been thinking for some time of writing a paper with the
> title "Why can't I see the structure?" based on the idea that
> modules in every programming l
Do you have any real-life example where complex stuff do not look like
blobs?
I'd start with this.
On 28 Apr 2016 5:52 a.m., "Richard A. O'Keefe" wrote:
> I've been thinking for some time of writing a paper with the
> title "Why can't I see the structure?" based on the idea that
> modules in eve
On 28/04/16 5:04 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
I am not sure if it matters for you but how about Standard ML modules?
Suffice it to say that I've been well aware of ML for a long time and have
the latest release of SML/NJ installed on my desktop and laptop machines
for a reason, think that SML's s
Then I suggest to look at
http://mlton.org/MLBasisSyntaxAndSemantics
About relations: you look for some specification language, when you state
the governing rules of the methods to each other. That brings program
verification of some sort.
Or, some literate programming you strive for, but Real P
On 28/04/16 5:09 PM, Flavius Aspra wrote:
Do you have any real-life example where complex stuff do not look like
blobs?
Literate programs. I'm thinking of the book about LCC, where I never
felt lost
at all.
I'd start with this.
Unfortunately, while literate programs help a lot, they
On 28/04/16 6:15 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
Then I suggest to look at
http://mlton.org/MLBasisSyntaxAndSemantics
Please. Don't try to teach your grandfather to suck eggs.
I've had mlton on my machines since the first release came out.
What part of that web page do you think has ANY RELEVANCE
