Paul,
Yes I've looked at that on Codeplex. There is a standard interface that
reads/writes data to NTFS or you can in fact write your own or buy in a 3rd
party driver of course.
I'm just confused as to if the implementation has an effect on the end user
program (the app) or are the fields
Yes, it is just counter intuitive and on the HP tablet it is also
intermittent. Making the meny fields larger font makes it somewhat easier but
I still don't like it.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
Sent: 13 March 2014
Do you call the methods directly or use RaiseEvent()? Personally I would bind
the click methods to the button or method click.
As for working out whether it is an increase or decreas, simply add a
last_value property to the control and use this to compare against the
current value to see if
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote:
Paul,
Yes I've looked at that on Codeplex. There is a standard interface that
reads/writes data to NTFS or you can in fact write your own or buy in a 3rd
party driver of course.
I'm just confused as to if the
Stephen,
Not relevant here in the UK. They are simply scanned images of shop floor
documentation
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: 14 March 2014 13:35
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] M$ SQL Server Remote
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote:
Stephen,
Not relevant here in the UK. They are simply scanned images of shop floor
documentation
-
Y'all write too much. :)
I am glad that our similar data is only a few hundred gigs. That system
is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG7vhMMXagQ
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN
901.246-0159 cell
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
Lol... The individual scans are only between 100Kb and 200Kb each but we need
to keep them for full traceability for our ISO approval.
Hence the need to get the Tablets out there onto the shop floor as opposed to
scanning in all these bits of paper!
Dave
-Original Message-
From:
Le 14/03/2014 15:33, Stephen Russell a écrit :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG7vhMMXagQ
she tried to write something in French ... but she was wrong !
Ceci n'est pas PI est mieux !
The Foxil
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
On 3/13/14, 12:29 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
Currently I store documents in a filesystem, which is less than ideal.
I'm curious as to why storing documents in a filesystem (and storing
references to them in your database) is less than ideal. It seems to me
you are properly separating concerns by
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 04:09 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
I'm curious as to why storing documents in a filesystem (and storing
references to them in your database) is less than ideal. It seems to me
you are properly separating concerns by doing it that way.
I too am curious!
Thanks Dave,
When I read your response I realized that what I need to do is adjust the
Spinner Low or High values of the opposite control from the interactive
change events. This prevents the value from going out of range and
eliminates the need to know the direction of the change in process.
Syntax is to name the event, not execute it:
RAISEEVENT(objectref,MethodName)
so:
RAISEEVENT(thisform.spiner1,DownClick)
Fred
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Joe Yoder j...@wheypower.com wrote:
Thanks Dave,
When I read your response I realized that what I need to do is adjust the
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Paul McNett p...@mcnettware.com wrote:
On 3/13/14, 12:29 PM, Paul Hill wrote:
Currently I store documents in a filesystem, which is less than ideal.
I'm curious as to why storing documents in a filesystem (and storing
references to them in your database)
Because storing them in the standard file system with pointers to them is:
1. Slow access times deteriorate as the depth of the tree and number of
documents in each folder increases
2. Potentially insecure. I know you can lock down the data via group policies
etc and we did in fact do
Thanks Fred, you beat me to it!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: 14 March 2014 16:20
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Spinner interactive change limit control etc
Syntax is to name the event, not execute it:
On 3/14/14, 9:25 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
Because storing them in the standard file system with pointers to them is:
1. Slow access times deteriorate as the depth of the tree and number of
documents in each folder increases
Perhaps it depends on the filesystem?
2. Potentially
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Paul McNett p...@mcnettware.com wrote:
2. Potentially insecure. I know you can lock down the data via group
policies etc and we did in fact do this when we used a pointer system but
it is a potential insecurity.
Perhaps the database is potentially
Thanks Fred and Dave,
The syntax solved the thrown error but the values are not changing. I put
a wait window in the DownClick event with the spinner.value. The window
shows the value each time the DownClick event fires both from the spinner
and from the button but the value only changes when
The problem was:
How can a Mac user access a specific share on a network where network
security is controlled by a SAMBA 3 (NT-style) domain?
The conditions were:
1. We have a /Public share on a CentOS file server.
2. Security on that share must be referred to the Primary Domain
Controller,
On 14/03/2014 21:42, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 04:09 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
I'm curious as to why storing documents in a filesystem (and storing
references to them in your database) is less than ideal. It seems to me
you are properly separating concerns by doing it that way.
At 07:33 2014-03-14, you wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG7vhMMXagQ
Very nice.
I have a puzzle of the week that I run for my alma mater's Math
Stats department. I also post it on my blog
(http://genew.ca/). This week's puzzle refers to Pi Day, and it also
has a
On 14 March 2014 14:33, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG7vhMMXagQ
There's a good reason why we use pi and not tau.
It's much easier to measure the diameter of a circle than the radius.
Lots of fun pi facts in this discussion on reddit:
On 14 March 2014 16:25, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote:
Because storing them in the standard file system with pointers to them is:
1. Slow access times deteriorate as the depth of the tree and number of
documents in each folder increases
2. Potentially insecure. I know you can
Sometimes you get a disconnect in this situation.
Have seen this where too many documents were in the folder. None could be
found but they were all there.
I have seen mp3 files magically disappear and reappear on NTFS in a folder
containing about 2000 files. I look for them and can't find
Original Message
Subject: Re: [NF] M$ SQL Server Remote Blob Store
From: Ken Dibble krdib...@stny.rr.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Date: 3/14/2014 7:22 PM
Sometimes you get a disconnect in this situation.
Have seen this where too many documents were in the folder. None
could
26 matches
Mail list logo
